[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"peripheral-nerve-block\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:peripheral-nerve-block":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,7,0,[8,44,67,89,116,144,168],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100626942","comparison-of-postoperative-analgesic-effects-of-quadro-iliac-plane-block-and-transversus-abdominis-plane-blocks-in-inguinal-hernia-surgery-100626942",false,"NCT07442188","Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Quadro-iliac Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Inguinal Hernia Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 18 and 65 years\n* Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III.\n* Patients with a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg\u002Fm².\n* Patients scheduled to undergo unilateral inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia in the operating room.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 18 years or older than 65 years.\n* Patients with an ASA physical status classification of IV or higher.\n* Patients with advanced comorbidities.\n* Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis.\n* Patients with infection at the site of the planned procedure.\n* Patients with a BMI below 18 kg\u002Fm² or above 30 kg\u002Fm².","ALL","18 Years","65 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},60,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. Despite being classified as a minor surgical intervention, moderate to severe postoperative pain is reported in approximately 60% of patients. In a subset of these patients, acute postoperative pain may persist and evolve into chronic post-surgical inguinal pain, significantly affecting quality of life.\n\nIn recent years, beyond the use of systemic intravenous analgesics, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have been increasingly incorporated into multimodal analgesia protocols with the aim of reducing postoperative opioid consumption and improving pain control. However, the current literature does not provide definitive evidence regarding the superiority of one block technique over another in this surgical population.\n\nThe primary objective of the present study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of the Quadro-iliac Plane Block (QIPB) and the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.",[26,27,28],"Peripheral Nerve Block","Pain Management","Hernia, Inguinal",[30,31],"Quadro Iliac Plane Block","Transversus Abdominis Plane Block","RECRUITING","2026-06-02",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-06-03","ACTUAL",{"date":33,"type":36},{"date":39,"type":20},"2026-10-19",{"name":41,"class":42},"Ankara Etlik City Hospital","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":53,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":57,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":60,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":61,"startDateStruct":63,"completionDateStruct":64,"leadSponsor":66,"locationsCount":43},"100638017","comparison-of-analgesic-effects-of-acb-versus-acb-combined-with-bifes-block-in-meniscopathy-surgery-100638017","NCT07603323","Comparison of Analgesic Effects of ACB Versus ACB Combined With BiFeS Block in Meniscopathy Surgery","Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Combined With BiFeS (Biceps Femoris Short Head) Block in Meniscopathy Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-65 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-II-III\n* Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18-30 kg\u002Fm2\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 and over 65 years of age\n* ASA score IV and above\n* Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis\n* BMI below 18 or above 30 kg\u002Fm2",{"count":52,"type":20},135,[23],"Meniscopathy surgeries are commonly associated with moderate postoperative pain, particularly during early mobilization and rehabilitation. Inadequate postoperative analgesia may negatively affect functional recovery, delay ambulation, increase opioid consumption, and contribute to opioid-related adverse effects. Therefore, effective multimodal analgesic strategies are of considerable importance in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee procedures.\n\nAdductor canal block (ACB) is a widely used regional anesthesia technique that provides effective analgesia while largely preserving quadriceps muscle strength. However, its limited effect on posterior knee capsule innervation may result in insufficient control of posterior knee pain. Recently, the biceps femoris short head (BiFeS) block has been described as a novel motor-sparing fascial plane block targeting the posterolateral knee capsule and may provide additional analgesic benefit when combined with ACB.\n\nIn this study, it was aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block alone and adductor canal block combined with BiFeS block in patients undergoing surgery for meniscopathy.",[56,26,27],"Meniscopathy Surgery",[56,58,59],"Adductor Canal Block","Biceps Femoris Short Head Block","2026-05-27",{"date":62,"type":36},"2026-05-29",{"date":60,"type":36},{"date":65,"type":20},"2027-05-21",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":68,"slug":69,"hasResults":11,"nctId":70,"briefTitle":71,"officialTitle":72,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":73,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":74,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":76,"briefSummary":77,"conditions":78,"keywords":80,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":82,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":83,"startDateStruct":85,"completionDateStruct":86,"leadSponsor":88,"locationsCount":43},"100634618","comparison-of-the-analgesic-effects-of-tfpb-in-renal-transplantation-surgery-100634618","NCT07542028","Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of TFPB in Renal Transplantation Surgery","Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Renal Transplantation Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-65 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III\n* Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18-30 kg\u002Fm2\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 and over 65 years of age\n* Patients with an ASA score other than III\n* Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis\n* BMI below 18 or above 30 kg\u002Fm2",{"count":75,"type":20},50,[23],"Renal transplantation is a major surgical procedure associated with significant postoperative pain, particularly due to lower abdominal incision, deep tissue dissection, and extensive surgical manipulation. Effective postoperative pain control is therefore of great importance in this patient population, as inadequate analgesia may impair early mobilization, delay recovery, increase opioid consumption, and contribute to opioid-related adverse effects. In addition, optimal analgesic management may improve patient comfort and support enhanced postoperative outcomes.\n\nNerve blocks reduces opioid consumption in the postoperative period by providing better pain control and therefore has advantages such as fewer side effects and less risk of pulmonary and cardiac complications.\n\nIn this study; it was aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of transversalis fascia plane block in the postoperative period in patients who underwent renal transplantation.",[79,26,27],"Renal Transplantation",[79,81],"Transversalis Fascia Plane Block","2026-04-27",{"date":84,"type":36},"2026-04-28",{"date":82,"type":36},{"date":87,"type":20},"2027-10-18",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":90,"slug":91,"hasResults":11,"nctId":92,"briefTitle":93,"officialTitle":94,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":95,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":96,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":97,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":99,"briefSummary":100,"conditions":101,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":105,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":106,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":107,"startDateStruct":109,"completionDateStruct":111,"leadSponsor":113,"locationsCount":4},"100631895","adductor-canal-block-methods-in-bilateral-total-knee-arthroplasty-100631895","NCT07506629","Adductor Canal Block Methods in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty","Comparison of Surgeon-Performed Intraoperative Adductor Canal Block and Ultrasound-Guided Anesthesiologist-Performed Block in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients aged 19 years or older\n* Patients scheduled for bilateral total knee arthroplasty\n* Patients who provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent\n* Neurological or psychiatric conditions affecting cooperation (e.g., dementia, delirium)\n* Pre-existing neurological or anatomical abnormalities of the lower extremities\n* Chronic opioid use or opioid dependence\n* Coagulation disorders or contraindications to nerve block\n* Pregnancy\n* Cases in which ultrasound evaluation is technically not feasible","60 Years",{"count":98,"type":20},48,[23],"This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of surgeon-performed intraoperative adductor canal block (ACB) and ultrasound-guided anesthesiologist-performed ACB in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a prospective, randomized paired design, each patient will receive surgeon-performed ACB on one knee and anesthesiologist-performed ACB on the contralateral knee.\n\nThe primary outcome is postoperative pain measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the study is designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of surgeon-performed ACB. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, time to first ambulation, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).\n\nAdditionally, postoperative ultrasound evaluation will be performed to assess the distribution pattern of local anesthetic within the adductor canal, including cross-sectional area and longitudinal spread. This study is expected to provide evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness and technical accuracy of surgeon-performed ACB in comparison with the conventional ultrasound-guided technique.",[102,103,104,26,58],"Knee Osteoarthritis","Total Knee Arthroplasty","Postoperative Pain","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-03-26",{"date":108,"type":36},"2026-04-01",{"date":110,"type":20},"2026-05-01",{"date":112,"type":20},"2029-03-01",{"name":114,"class":115},"Yonsei University","OTHER",{"id":117,"slug":118,"hasResults":11,"nctId":119,"briefTitle":120,"officialTitle":121,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":122,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":123,"enrollmentInfo":124,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":125,"briefSummary":126,"conditions":127,"keywords":131,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":136,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":137,"startDateStruct":139,"completionDateStruct":141,"leadSponsor":143,"locationsCount":43},"100604586","comparison-of-conventional-and-retroclavicular-approaches-for-ultrasound-guided-infraclavicular-brachial-plexus-block-100604586","NCT07151443","Comparison of Conventional and Retroclavicular Approaches for Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block","Comparison of Conventional and Retroclavicular Approaches for Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Obese Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients 18-80 years of age\n* Those with ASA score II-III\n* Those with a body mass index (BMI) \\>30\n* Patients who are suitable for forearm and hand surgery under regional anesthesia in the operating room\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who cannot perceive and evaluate pain\n* Patients who want to have surgery under general anesthesia\n* Patients in whom regional anesthesia is contraindicated","80 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},[23],"Forearm and hand surgeries are among the most frequently performed surgical interventions both in trauma patients and electively.In these procedures, alternative anesthesia methods such as general anesthesia, regional intravenous anesthesia, regional peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthesia are available.\n\nPeripheral nerve blockade can be used for anesthesia and analgesia.This method allows patients to undergo surgery without general anesthesia and increases patient satisfaction by providing effective analgesia in the postoperative period.\n\nThe aim of this study was to compare the conventional and retroclavicular approaches to infraclavicular block in patients undergoing forearm and hand surgery.",[26,27,128,129,130],"Forearm Surgery","Hand Surgery","Upper Extremity",[132,133,130,134,135],"Infraclavicular Block","Obesity","Hand surgery","Forearm surgery","2025-12-08",{"date":138,"type":36},"2025-12-15",{"date":140,"type":36},"2025-09-15",{"date":142,"type":20},"2026-06-25",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":145,"slug":146,"hasResults":11,"nctId":147,"briefTitle":148,"officialTitle":149,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":150,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":123,"enrollmentInfo":151,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":153,"briefSummary":154,"conditions":155,"keywords":157,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":160,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":161,"startDateStruct":163,"completionDateStruct":165,"leadSponsor":167,"locationsCount":43},"100565195","comparison-of-the-postoperative-analgesic-efficacy-of-spsipb-and-espb-in-anterior-cervical-discectomy-100565195","NCT06639022","Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of SPSIPB and ESPB in Anterior Cervical Discectomy","Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Anterior Cervical Discectomy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-80 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-II-III\n* Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18-30 kg\u002Fm2\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 and over 80 years of age\n* ASA score IV and above\n* Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis\n* BMI below 18 or above 30 kg\u002Fm2",{"count":152,"type":20},85,[23],"Anterior cervical discectomy is an operation performed for complaints of pain, numbness or loss of strength due to cervical disc disease. With this operation, pressure due to herniation on the upper neck area, spinal cord or nerve roots is relieved. It is performed by microscopic method from the front of the neck.\n\nNerve blocks reduces opioid consumption in the postoperative period by providing better pain control and therefore has advantages such as fewer side effects and less risk of pulmonary and cardiac complications.\n\nIn this study; it was aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block and erector spinae plane block, with each other and with the control group in the postoperative period in patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy.",[156,26,27],"Anterior Cervical Discectomy",[156,158,159],"Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block","Erector Spinae Plane Block","2024-11-04",{"date":162,"type":36},"2024-11-05",{"date":164,"type":36},"2024-10-15",{"date":166,"type":20},"2025-11-20",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":169,"slug":170,"hasResults":11,"nctId":171,"briefTitle":172,"officialTitle":173,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":174,"healthyVolunteers":175,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":176,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":178,"briefSummary":179,"conditions":180,"keywords":182,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":187,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":188,"startDateStruct":190,"completionDateStruct":192,"leadSponsor":194,"locationsCount":43},"100566238","effectiveness-of-modified-thoracoabdominal-nerve-block-perichondrial-approach-m-tapa-in-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-100566238","NCT06652581","Effectiveness Of Modified-Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","Effectiveness Of Modified-Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) Post-Operative Analgesia Compared To Intravenous Opioids In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patient 18-65 yeasr old\n2. IMT 17.5-30 kg\u002Fm2\n3. Patient with ASA I-II\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patient Refusal\n2. Local Infection\n3. Chronic Analgesia drug user",true,{"count":177,"type":20},42,[23],"The Goal of this clinical trial is to determine the advantages of using Peripheral Nerve Block by injecting drugs under the skin on both sides of the abdomen in the upper abdominal area in patients undergoing laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Study participants will be divided into 2 groups, namely group P1 receiving Modified Thoracoabdominal Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) block anesthesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and group P2 only receiving intravenous opioids postoperatively. Peripheral nerve blocks on both sides of the upper abdomen are expected to be able to prolong the duration of pain relief, reduce the pain scale, and the total dose of pain medication needed postoperatively. The injection of this peripheral nerve block drug will be carried out by an anesthesiologist. Researchers will continue to anticipate the occurrence of side effects that can occur with strict monitoring and emergency care standards. This study will last up to 24 hours after surgery.\n\nThe main question it aims to answer is:\n\nTo prove that the amount of postoperative intravenous opioid consumption with M-TAPA block is lower than the control group.",[181,26],"Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy",[183,184,26,185,186,104],"Analgesia","Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy","Pain management","Ultrasound","2024-10-19",{"date":189,"type":36},"2024-10-22",{"date":191,"type":36},"2024-09-12",{"date":193,"type":20},"2024-11-13",{"name":195,"class":115},"Udayana University"]