[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"prevention--control\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:prevention--control":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,51],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":40,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":41,"startDateStruct":44,"completionDateStruct":46,"leadSponsor":48,"locationsCount":4},"100610783","phase-3-pre-empt-prospective-randomized-evaluation-and-management-of-premature-atherosclerosis-100610783",false,"NCT07232069","PRE-EMPT: Prospective RandomizEd Evaluation and Management of Premature aTherosclerosis","Prospective RandomizEd Evaluation and Management of Premature aTherosclerosis","PRE-EMPT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Women aged 40-60 years; Men aged 30-50 years\n2. Willing and able to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures\n3. Smart phone user\n4. Use of highly effective contraception by females with reproductive potential.\n5. CAC score 1-99 in the screening study or entry through the known plaque pathway (with mild CAC or CAC\\\u003C100 if known; elevated CAC on baseline CCTA is not exclusionary in the known plaque arm)\n6. Diagnostic baseline CCTA with NCPV ≥10 mm3 as assessed by the central core lab\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Clinical diagnosis of ASCVD including coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or cerebrovascular disease (CeVD)\n2. Current symptoms thought to be from CAD\n3. PREVENT ASCVD 10-year risk ≥5% (if known)\n4. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) as defined by any of the following: DM diagnosis in the medical record or HbA1C of 6.5% or greater. (if known)\n5. LDL-C ≥190mg\u002FdL (most recent, if known)\n6. HIV (if known)\n7. Severe liver disease or untreated Hepatitis C infection (if known)\n8. Pregnancy, lactation or intending to become pregnant during the study period of 2 years\n9. eGFR \\\u003C45mL\u002Fmin\u002F1.73m2 (if known)\n10. AST or ALT \\>1.5x the upper limit of normal (if known)\n11. BMI\\>40kg\u002Fm2 or unable to have a CCTA scan for any reason\n12. Allergy to iodinated intravenous contrast or other contraindication to CCTA\n13. Current or previous use of lipid lowering therapy or colchicine\n14. Known allergic reactions or sensitivity to the study intervention(s), including known intolerance or contraindication(s) to statin or colchicine, or long-term use of medications that are contraindicated with colchicine or rosuvastatin.\n15. Systemic cancer undergoing active treatment\n16. PREVENT ASCVD 10-year risk ≥5%\n17. eGFR \\\u003C45 ml\u002Fmin\u002F1.73m2 per baseline labs, (2021 CKD-EPI equation will be used if multiple options are available)\n18. Hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5% per baseline labs\n19. LDL-C ≥190mg\u002FdL per baseline labs\n20. Severe proximal coronary artery stenosis as determined by the central core lab (≥50% left main or ≥70% proximal major coronary artery stenosis)\n21. Known contraindication to follow-up CCTA (e.g., new IV contrast allergy discovered during the baseline CCTA)\n22. Individuals who are excluded based on any of these factors will be notified as to the reason for exclusion and encouraged to follow-up locally to address this medical issue with their treating physician.","ALL","30 Years","60 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},1500,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"PHASE3","Heart disease is the leading cause of death for men, women, and people of most racial and ethnic groups in the United States. This clinical trial will test if screening and early treatment of mild heart disease works.\n\nPRE-EMPT will screen individuals at low 10-year risk of heart disease with heart disease risk factors to identify those who already have early cholesterol build up, also called \"plaque\", in their heart arteries. It consists of two phases:\n\n1. A Screening Study - Participants will be assessed for plaque by one or both of these scans.\n\n   * Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) Scan: A CT scan that looks for calcium or plaque in heart arteries.\n   * Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) Scan: A CT scan that uses contrast dye to create detailed 3D pictures of heart arteries to look for plaque.\n2. A Treatment Trial (approximately 1,500 participants) - Based on the results of the CCTA, participants may be randomized into a two-year trial to test medications aimed at reducing or stabilizing plaque. Participants will have a 1 in 4 chance of receiving only placebo, and a 3 in 4 chance of receiving at least one active medication. Participants will take two pills once a day-either both active medications, one active and one placebo, or both placebos.\n\n   * Rosuvastatin 20 mg: a cholesterol-lowering medicine\n   * Colchicine 0.5 mg: a medication that lowers inflammation\n\nEveryone in the trial will be given information and advice on heart-healthy diet and lifestyle.\n\nParticipants will have up to two in-person visits for the screening study, then phone visits for the Treatment Trial at the beginning, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months when they will also have an in-person visit for a CCTA Scan. Participants will have blood drawn using an at-home collection device mailed to their home at the beginning, 3 months, and end of the study.",[28,29,30,31],"Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors Multiple","Coronary Artery Disease Progression","Prevention & Control","Premature Atherosclerosis",[33,34,35,36,37,38],"Prevention","Heart Disease Prevention","Family History of Heart Disease","At risk for heart disease","coronary artery calcium","non-calcified coronary plaque","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-02-25",{"date":42,"type":43},"2026-02-27","ACTUAL",{"date":45,"type":22},"2026-07-01",{"date":47,"type":22},"2031-07",{"name":49,"class":50},"Duke University","OTHER",{"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":11,"nctId":54,"briefTitle":55,"officialTitle":56,"acronym":57,"eligibilityCriteria":58,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":59,"maxAge":60,"enrollmentInfo":61,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":63,"phases":4,"briefSummary":64,"conditions":65,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":78},"100611190","impact-of-prevention-of-safe-sleeping-and-unexpected-infant-death-100611190","NCT07237360","Impact of Prevention of Safe Sleeping and Unexpected Infant Death","Impact in Pediatric Emergency Departments of a Systematic Individualized Interview Conducted by an Advanced Practice Nurse, on the Prevention of Safe Sleeping and Unexpected Infant Death, in a Population of Infants From 0 to 6 Months","MinUTE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* All parents consulting the Pediatric Emergency Department of University Hospital of Angers for their baby aged 0 to 6 months\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any other person consulting for a baby aged 0 to 6 months who is not the parent of the baby: a grandparent, an uncle, an aunt, a childminder, the nursery manager, a friend of the parents, etc.\n* Parent refusing the use of their data\n* Parent and\u002For child under legal protection\n* Parent who does not understand French","0 Months","6 Months",{"count":62,"type":22},100,"OBSERVATIONAL","The sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is defined as \"the sudden death of a child aged from 1 month to 1 year who had been healthy until then, whereas nothing in his known history or in the history of events could have allowed him to predict\". In France, the French High Autority of Health (Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)) has set the upper age limit at 2 years.\n\nAccording to french statistics, between 250 and 350 babies die each year of unexpected infant death. It is the leading cause of infant mortality in developed countries, with all the devastating psychological, social and legal consequences for families. The national prevention campaigns for the \"back to sleep\" SUID carried out in the 1990s allowed a 75% decrease in the number of SUID. Yet, still at the moment, around 150 deaths could be avoided each year in France by respecting strict dorsal sleeping recommendations and a safe environment.\n\nAccording to the SUID register of Nantes (France) of April 2024, 75% of deaths occur before the child's six months. The risk factors are mainly prematurity, exposure to tobacco (during and after pregnancy), and a sleeping mode not recommended by HAS. Indeed, on the day of death, 20% of babies were lying on their stomach or side, 30% shared their bed and 59% were lying in bedding at risk of containment or obstruction of the upper airway.\n\nAccording to the database of National Association of Infant Death Unexpected Reference Centers since 2022, there has been a resurgence in the number of these deaths. This proves the urgency of prevention on this public health issue.\n\nIn parallel, we do not know why the number of SUID is not decreasing in correlation with the decrease in the birth rate in France. Moreover, it would be interesting to know the reasons why parents do not follow the recommendations of the HAS for their baby to sleep safely.\n\nThus, I wish to evaluate the impact of systematic prevention by the Advanced Practice Nurse with the parents of infants aged 0 to 6 months presenting to the Pediatric Emergency and know their barriers\u002Flevers to change.\n\nMy research question is therefore titled:\n\nWhy and how many infants under 6 months sleep in insecurity compared to lying babies according to the international recommendations ?",[66,30,67],"Unexpected Infant Death","Safe Sleeping","2025-11-14",{"date":70,"type":43},"2025-11-19",{"date":72,"type":22},"2025-11-30",{"date":74,"type":22},"2026-06-30",{"name":76,"class":77},"University Hospital, Angers","OTHER_GOV",1]