[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"radius-fracture\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:radius-fracture":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,56,91],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":4,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":43,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":44,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":45,"startDateStruct":48,"completionDateStruct":50,"leadSponsor":52,"locationsCount":55},"100625954","easy-algorithm-trial-elbow-trauma-assessment-using-sonography-in-children-and-youth-diagnostic-accuracy-and-safety-of-point-of-care-ultrasound-as-a-screening-tool-for-suspected-elbow-fractures-in-children-aged-5-to-15-years-a-multicenter-prospective-cohort-study-100625954",false,"NCT07429344","EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study","EASY Algorithm Trial (Elbow Trauma Assessment Using Sonography in Children and Youth) Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Point-of-care Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Suspected Elbow Fractures in Children Aged 5 to 15 Years: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study by the German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT)","EASY Algorithm","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* children and adolescents aged 5-15 years with anamnestic and clinically justified need for the exclusion of a fracture after elbow trauma\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* elbow trauma as part of a polytrauma,\n* parents' insufficient German language skills (spoken or written),\n* trauma more than 72 hours ago,\n* presentation at the emergency room with current, post-traumatic external X-ray images of the affected elbow joint from another clinic or practice,\n* open fracture of the affected elbow joint,\n* skin avulsion of the affected elbow joint,\n* visible deformity of the affected elbow joint,\n* and pathological status of peripheral circulation, motor function, and\u002For sensitivity.","ALL","5 Years","15 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},543,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to learn about the safety and accuracy of ultrasound as a screening tool to detect broken bones (fractures) in the elbow area in children and youth aged 5 to 15 years. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\n\\- Can ultrasound reliably show that there is a fracture in the elbow area after an accident?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Have an ultrasound of their elbow to look for fluid in the joint.\n* Have standard X-rays of their elbow to check if there is a fracture.\n* Have their medical records checked and answer a phone call 6 weeks later to see how their elbow has healed (only if no fracture was found during the first visit).",[26,27,28,29,30,31],"Elbow Fractures","Distal Humerus Fracture","Pediatric Trauma","Radius Fracture","Olecranon Fracture","Supracondylar Humerus Fracture",[33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42],"EASY Algorithm Trial","pediatric trauma","Diagnostic accuracy","point-of-care ultrasound","elbow fractures","children","Elbow Trauma Assessment using Sonography in Children and Youth","German Section for Pediatric Traumatology (SKT)","screening tool","supracondylar humerus fracture","RECRUITING","2026-04-02",{"date":46,"type":47},"2026-04-08","ACTUAL",{"date":49,"type":47},"2026-03-02",{"date":51,"type":22},"2027-01-15",{"name":53,"class":54},"Timo Munz","OTHER",13,{"id":57,"slug":58,"hasResults":11,"nctId":59,"briefTitle":60,"officialTitle":61,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":62,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":63,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":64,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":66,"phases":67,"briefSummary":69,"conditions":70,"keywords":76,"overallStatus":80,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":81,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":82,"startDateStruct":84,"completionDateStruct":86,"leadSponsor":88,"locationsCount":90},"100613185","evaluation-of-diaphragmatic-function-after-interscalene-block-with-liposomal-bupivacaine-100613185","NCT07263295","Evaluation of Diaphragmatic Function After Interscalene Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine","Evaluation of Diaphragmatic Function After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Cohort Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing upper limb surgery scheduled for interscalene brachial plexus block\n* Aged ≥ 18 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known allergy or intolerance to amide local anesthetics\n* Nerve injury in the upper limb on the surgical side\n* Coagulopathy\n* Used opioid medications continuously for more than 3 weeks before surgery\n* History of pulmonary disease and a pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂) \\\u003C 95% (measured after 5 minutes of rest at room temperature without oxygen supplementation, using a transcutaneous pulse oximeter)\n* Refuse to participate or are deemed unsuitable for this trial by the researchers\n\nWithdrawal Criteria:\n\n* Patients voluntarily withdrew their informed consent\n* Surgery was canceled or the anesthesia method was changed due to surgical factors before interscalene brachial plexus block","18 Years",{"count":65,"type":22},120,"INTERVENTIONAL",[68],"NA","The study aims to evaluation the effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine on diaphragmatic function in patients undergoing upper limb surgery who receive Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block. A total of 120 eligible patients will be enrolled and divided into two groups: Group A will receive 20ml of 0.5% Hydrochloride Bupivacaine , while Group B will receive 10ml of 0.5% Hydrochloride Bupivacaine plus 10ml of Liposomal Bupivacaine. Assessments of diaphragmatic function, pulmonary function, and pain intensity will be performed before the block and at different time points after the block, with follow-up for adverse events. The study is scheduled to run from September 2025 to September 2026, with strict adherence to privacy protection and ethical guidelines.",[71,72,29,73,74,75],"Diaphragmatic Function","Metacarpal Fracture","Peripheral Nerve Neurolysis","Chronic Ulcer","Upper Extremity Ligament Injury",[77,78,79],"Interscalene brachial plexus block","Liposomal Bupivacaine","Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-11-30",{"date":83,"type":47},"2025-12-04",{"date":85,"type":22},"2025-12-05",{"date":87,"type":22},"2026-12-20",{"name":89,"class":54},"Zhejiang University",1,{"id":92,"slug":93,"hasResults":11,"nctId":94,"briefTitle":95,"officialTitle":95,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":96,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":63,"maxAge":97,"enrollmentInfo":98,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":4,"briefSummary":100,"conditions":101,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":80,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":102,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":103,"startDateStruct":105,"completionDateStruct":107,"leadSponsor":109,"locationsCount":4},"100592859","arthroscopic-assisted-distal-radius-fracture-fixation-100592859","NCT06998914","Arthroscopic Assisted Distal Radius Fracture Fixation","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Recent distal radius fractures which occurred less than 14 day clssification 2R3B1,2R3B2,2R3B3,2R3C1 on AO classification with articular surface displacement or gap ≥ 2mm after reduction\n* Patient aged from 18 to 60 years.\n* Potential associated ligament injuries.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Poly-traumatized patients or those with other fractures in the same upper limb.\n* Open fractures or neurovascular deficit or medical fractures.\n* Patient with severe complications that prevent clear visualization during arthroscopy.\n* Patient with uncontrolled chronic diseases, especially uncontrolled DM or HTN","60 Years",{"count":99,"type":22},20,"Distal radius fractures (DRF) are among the most common orthopedic injuries, both in young adults and in elderly patients.(1,2,4،7 ) Effective management of these fractures is crucial to restoring wrist function, ensuring stability, and minimizing complications. (2)Traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) remains the cornerstone of treatment. (3)However, minimally invasive techniques are increasingly gaining attention for their ability to improve outcomes while reducing complications.(5, 8) Wrist arthroscopy has emerged as a valuable tool in the management of DRF. It allows for direct visualization of intra-articular fractures, assessment of associated soft tissue injuries, and precise reduction of fracture fragments. Additionally, it facilitates the identification and management of concomitant injuries, such as triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears or ligament injuries, which are frequently overlooked in traditional techniques. (6, 9 ،10) Despite these advantages, the use of wrist arthroscopy in DRF management remains underutilized in many regions. In Assiut University Hospital, there is a growing interest in incorporating advanced techniques, including wrist arthroscopy, into the management of orthopedic injuries. However, there is limited local data on the outcomes and feasibility of this approach in the treatment of DRF. This case series aims to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of DRF management using wrist arthroscopy, providing insight into its effectiveness, safety, and applicability in a tertiary care setting. By documenting the experiences and outcomes of patients treated with this innovative technique, this study seeks to contribute to the existing literature and guide the future adoption of arthroscopy-assisted methods in DRF management in the region.\n\n-The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of managing distal radius fractures assisted by wrist arthroscopy at Assiut University Hospital using Mayo wrist score, with a focus on its effectiveness, safety, and feasibility in improving fracture reduction, identifying associated injuries, and enhancing patient recovery.",[29],"2025-05-22",{"date":104,"type":47},"2025-05-31",{"date":106,"type":22},"2025-08-01",{"date":108,"type":22},"2026-11-01",{"name":110,"class":54},"Assiut University"]