[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"resilience-psychological\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:resilience-psychological":35},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,14,0,[8,66,102,131,158,188,217,241,266,288,319,351,375,404],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":49,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":54,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":55,"startDateStruct":58,"completionDateStruct":60,"leadSponsor":62,"locationsCount":65},"100586442","personalized-care-for-prenatal-stress-reduction--prevention-of-preterm-birth-ptb-disparities-100586442",false,"NCT06915428","Personalized Care for Prenatal Stress Reduction & Prevention of Preterm Birth (PTB) Disparities","Personalized Toolkit Building a Comprehensive Approach to Resource Optimization and Empowerment in Pregnancy & Beyond (PTBCARE+) A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Personalized Care for Prenatal Stress Reduction and Preterm Birth Disparities Prevention","PTBCARE+","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Viable, singleton pregnancy, 8+0 to 19+6 weeks, dated by last menstrual period ± ultrasound using standard obstetric criteria per American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.\n\n   Gestational age at first ultrasound by last menstrual period (LMP) \u002F Ultrasound method \u002F Measurement agreement with LMP required • Up to 8 weeks 6 days \u002F crown rump length \u002F ± 5 days\n   * 9 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 days \u002F crown rump length \u002F ± 7 days\n   * 14 weeks 0 days to 15 weeks 6 days \u002F standard fetal biometry \u002F ± 7 days\n   * 16 weeks 0 days to 19 weeks 6 days \u002F standard fetal biometry \u002F ± 10 days\n   * Gestational dating \u002F fetal viability must be confirmed by ultrasound prior to enrollment \u002F randomization.\n   * Ultrasound report must include documentation of normal fetal heart rate of ≥ 120 beats per minute, or subsequent medical record documentation of auscultation of fetal heart rate ≥ 120 beats per minute.\n   * Viability must be confirmed \u002F re-confirmed within 7 days of randomization.\n\n   If initial consent occurs early in pregnancy and V1\u002Frandomization occur later, viability must be reconfirmed to ensure ongoing eligibility prior to initiating V1 activities (including surveys) and proceeding with randomization.\n2. No signs or symptoms of, or clinical diagnosis of, evolving miscarriage, active preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes at the time of enrollment.\n\n   * Cervical dilation at the time of enrollment is an exclusion criterion. However, cervical evaluation and digital cervical exam is not required prior to enrollment.\n\n     (3a) High a priori risk for medically indicated preterm birth - must meet at least one of the following 3 criteria (maternal medical history, prior pregnancy history, or moderate risk factor history)\n   * miPTB criteria #1: Maternal Medical History - any one of the following:\n\n     o Known chronic hypertension requiring medications in the 3 months prior to conception or prior to 22 weeks gestation.\n\n     o At least 2 blood pressure readings 6 hours apart, \\\u003C20 weeks gestation, with systolic ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic ≥ 80 mmHg \\*regardless of need for medication or formal diagnosis of hypertension in chart\\*\n\n     o Pre-gestational diabetes mellitus.\n     * Diabetes diagnosed \\\u003C20 weeks gestation.\n     * Maternal chronic or sub-acute renal disease, including chronic kidney failure, chronic renal insufficiency, glomerulonephritis, lupus nephritis, defined as any:\n\n       \\*biopsy proven chronic renal disease history; and\u002For\n\n       \\*serum creatinine ≥ 1.1 mg\u002FdL at any time during pregnancy prior to enrollment, in the absence of other identifiable transient factors per clinician's assessment (e.g., extreme dehydration, cystitis, pyelonephritis); and\u002For\n\n       \\*chronic proteinuria, defined as baseline urine protein:creatinine ratio ≥ 0.30 mg\u002FdL or 24 hour total urine protein ≥ 300 mg in the absence of other identifiable transient factors per clinician's assessment (e.g., extreme dehydration, cystitis, pyelonephritis)\n\n       \\*Systemic Lupus Erythematosus\n       * Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome\n   * miPTB criteria #2: Prior pregnancy history - any ONE of the following: o Previous pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at any gestational age, in a singleton gestation; the fetus must not have had major structural anomalies or aneuploidy.\n\n     o Previous history of stillbirth ≥ 16+0 weeks in a singleton gestation; the fetus must not have had major structural anomalies or aneuploidy. The stillbirth etiology must not have been attributed to physical trauma (e.g., domestic violence, motor vehicle accident) or illicit drug use (e.g., cocaine use leading to abruption and stillbirth).\n   * miPTB criteria #3: Any two or more of the following moderate risk factors: o Nulliparity, defined as no prior pregnancy to reach at least 20 weeks gestation note that this is the traditional \u002F classic definition of 'nulliparous' and that there is overlap between nulliparity as defined this way and 'preterm birth' due to cervical insufficiency, which allows for deliveries in the 16-19 week gestational age range to be considered as 'preterm births'\n\n     o Obesity: current or pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥30 kg\u002Fm\\^2\n\n     o Family history: first degree relative with a history of preeclampsia\n\n     o Advanced maternal age: maternal age ≥ 35 years at estimated date of confinement\n\n     o Prior adverse obstetric history - one or more of the following:\n\n     \\- history of low birth weight or small for gestational age baby in a singleton gestation, defined as weight \\\u003C10% for gestational age and fetal sex; the fetus must not have had major structural anomalies or aneuploidy.\n\n     \\- history of adverse pregnancy outcome in a singleton gestation; the fetus must not have had major structural anomalies or aneuploidy.\n\n     o Long interpregnancy interval: ≥ 10 year (3650 day) pregnancy interval, defined as the time (in days) between the date of delivery of the last pregnancy to reach ≥ 20 weeks gestation and the first day of the last menstrual period for the current pregnancy.\n\n     o Black or African-American race (as a proxy for underlying racism) - self-reported. Participants who self-identify as being of more than one racial group will be considered to be of Black race for the purposes of this criterion if one of the racial groups is Black or African-American.\n     * Low socioeconomic status, defined as one or more of the following: housing or food insecurity noted in chart within the last year, self-pay or Medicaid insurance, less than high school education\n\nand\u002For\n\n(3b) High a priori risk for spontaneous preterm birth - must meet at least one of the following 2 criteria (prior pregnancy history or current pregnancy course)\n\n* sPTB criteria #1: Prior pregnancy history\n\n  * EITHER a history of a delivery of a singleton, non-anomalous baby between 16+0 and 34+6 weeks gestation or delivery of a twin, non-anomalous pregnancy between 160 \u002F7and 276 \u002F7 weeks gestation due to spontaneous preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, cervical insufficiency, or placental abruption - Chart documentation of prior preterm birth, the gestational age of the prior preterm birth (referred to as the 'qualifying delivery') should be determined. If the gestational age at delivery is obtained directly from the medical record and more than one gestational age appears, the greater of the two will be used assuming that neither is the 'source document' (i.e. an ultrasound report with a due date, a c-section report, a delivery note, etc).\n\nUse the following table as a validation of the previous delivery. For example, if the infant was male and weighed more than 2763 grams (6 pounds, 1.5 ounces) then the patient would be ineligible based on history of a preterm birth criteria. This table should only be used to determine whether the qualifying delivery is most likely to be preterm less than 35 weeks gestation when the gestational age CANNOT be verified\u002Fcalculated by review of the medical records or is not available in the medical records.\n\nGestational age 90th percentile - boys 90th percentile - girls 33 weeks \\> 2488g 5 lbs 7.8 oz \\> 2116g 4 lbs 10.6 oz 34 weeks \\> 2763g 6 lbs 1.5 oz \\> 2379g 5 lbs 3.9 oz 35 weeks \\> 3084g 6 lbs 12.8 oz \\> 2661g 5 lbs 13.9 oz\n\n* Documented history of a prior pregnancy complicated by asymptomatic cervical shortening \\\u003C25mm between 16+0 and 23+6 weeks gestation or cervical dilation ≥ 0.5cm requiring cervical cerclage placement prior to 24+0 weeks gestation, even if delivery ultimately occurred ≥ 35 weeks gestation or at term.\n\n  • sPTB criteria #2: Current pregnancy course\n* Asymptomatic cervical shortening \\\u003C25mm in the current pregnancy, diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound that is performed ≥14+0 weeks gestation, per Registered Diagnostic Medical Sonographer(RDMS) certified Sonographer or physician with transvaginal ultrasound training program (or similar) qualifications\n* Cervical cerclage in situ in the current pregnancy due to concern for risk of preterm birth, at the discretion of the primary obstetric provider\n\n  (4) Ability to provide written, informed consent in English or Spanish\n\n  (5) Planned prenatal care at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill obstetrics clinics and planned delivery at the University of North Carolina Women's Hospital (Chapel Hill, NC).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Participation in another intervention based clinical trial during pregnancy that is deemed, at the discretion of the investigative team for the current study or the other concurrent study, to conflict with this research and\u002For confound the study results.\n\n   o There are some concurrent studies, even those designed to test an intervention, which may be compatible with the current study; this will be reviewed by the investigative leadership team on a case-by-case basis.\n2. Previous participation in the PTBCARE+ program in another pregnancy, with randomization to the PTBCARE+ (active intervention) group.\n3. Current, ongoing, illicit drug use ≥ 12 weeks gestation.\n\n   * Use of tobacco and\u002For marijuana products is not an exclusion.\n   * Receiving treatment for opioid use disorder with methadone, suboxone, or similar in an approved treatment program is not an exclusion.\n4. History of radical trachelectomy\n5. Planned voluntary termination of pregnancy.\n6. Heavy vaginal bleeding or large subchorionic hemorrhage - defined as:\n\n   * Bleeding as primary reason for unplanned clinic evaluation or emergency room visit within 14 days of potential enrollment\n   * Subjective bleeding accompanied by ≥ 4 point drop in the hematocrit within 14 days of potential enrollment\n   * Subchorionic hemorrhage or abruption on formal ultrasound with a volume ≥ 64 cubic cm (4cm x 4cm x 4cm) within 14 days of potential enrollment\n7. Major congenital anomaly such as major structural deficit of the heart, lungs, brain, or other major organ system\n\n   1. Mild renal abnormalities, clubfoot, isolated cleft lip\u002Fpalate, etc. in the fetus are not a reason for exclusion.\n   2. Isolated 'soft markers' for aneuploidy (such as choroid plexus cysts, echogenic bowel, etc.) are not a reason for exclusion.\n   3. If a major congenital anomaly is diagnosed \\*after\\* enrollment, the patient will continue to participate in the study, however, the investigators will plan to analyze the study results with and without these individuals included.\n8. Positive aneuploidy screening test (traditional biochemical assay, e.g., quad screen - risk of aneuploidy of 1:25 or higher or cell free deoxynucleic acid (DNA) test result that is screen positive for trisomy 13, trisomy 18, trisomy 21, or sex chromosome abnormality) in the absence of definitive fetal karyotype evaluation.\n\n   * Definitive fetal karyotype evaluation can only be obtained through direct testing of the tissue from the conceptus - by chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis during pregnancy.\n   * The term \"suspected aneuploidy\" is commonly used in the medical record but this is not a diagnosis and by itself is not informative and not an exclusion criteria.\n9. Cystic hygroma or abnormally thickened nuchal translucency ≥ 3 mm at any time in the current gestation, regardless of subsequent diagnostic testing results.\n\n   * Note that a cystic hygroma remains an exclusion criterion regardless of subsequent diagnostic testing results because fetuses with this history carry an elevated risk of major congenital heart disease.\n   * Fetal echocardiogram is most accurately performed at 22-24 weeks gestation, which is later than the enrollment gestational age window.\n10. Polyhydramnios at or prior to enrollment.\n\n    o Polyhydramnios is defined as a maximum vertical pocket ≥ 8.0 cm, given that polyhydramnios \\\u003C22 weeks has a high likelihood of being associated with congenital anomalies\u002Faneuploidy and\u002For preterm birth due to preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.\n11. For potential participants who meet eligibility criteria ONLY due to prior spontaneous or medically indicated preterm birth: if the prior preterm birth was in a pregnancy complicated by twins, confirmed fetal aneuploidy, or major congenital fetal anomalies in the absence of another pregnancy meeting inclusion criteria they are not eligible.\n12. Known HIV positive with viral load greater than 1,000 copies\u002FmL or cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count less than 350\u002Fmm\\^3\n13. Unwillingness to undergo randomization.","FEMALE","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},1228,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a personalized prenatal support program \\[(Personalized Toolkit Building a Comprehensive Approach to Resource optimization and Empowerment in Pregnancy \\& Beyond, (PTBCARE+)\\] works to lower stress and lower the risk of early delivery in pregnant individuals at high-risk for delivering preterm. The main question\\[s\\] it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does the PTBCARE+ patient support program lower patient-reported stress levels during pregnancy?\n* Does the PTBCARE+ patient support program improve biologic measures of stress during pregnancy?\n* Does the PTBCARE+ patient support program result in a higher chance of delivering a healthy baby at or close to full term?\n\nResearchers will compare people who participate in the PTBCARE+ patient support program to those receive usual care to see if the PTBCARE+ patient support program lowers patient-reported stress, improves biologic measures of stress, and increases the chance of delivering a healthy baby at or close to full term.\n\nParticipants will be randomly assigned to receive the PTBCARE+ patient support program or usual prenatal care.\n\nAll participants will be asked to:\n\n* complete 2 study visits during pregnancy - including completing electronic surveys, providing a blood and urine sample, measuring the heart rate variability by a clip or the ear or finger, and body composition evaluation using a simple scale-like device.\n* complete one study visit postpartum that includes completing electronic surveys, and measuring heart rate variability. Blood and urine sample collection and body composition evaluation via InBody scale are optional at the postpartum visit.\n\nPeople who are randomly assigned to receive the PTBCARE+ support program will receive several resources to help them during pregnancy. These things include items such as:\n\n* a stress reduction toolkit;\n* access to an online website that can also be downloaded as a smart phone app;\n* the option to receive an electronic massage while in clinic, and more.\n* additional support gifts provided at routine clinical appointments\n\nPeople who are randomly assigned to receive usual prenatal care will not receive any additional support resources from the study during pregnancy.",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48],"Preterm Birth Complication","Preterm Birth","Preterm Birth Recurrence","Preeclampsia","Preeclampsia (PE)","Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy","Support Program","Stress","Resilience, Psychological","Empowerment, Patient","Emotional Stress","Pregnancy","Pregnancy Complications","Pregnancy Induced Hypertension","Neonates and Preterm Infants","Cervical Insufficiency","Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)","Cervical Shortening","Disparities in Pregnancy Complications","Disparities","Prenatal Care","Care Coordination",[15,50,51,52],"pregnancy-related disparities","patient support program","enhanced prenatal care","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-25",{"date":56,"type":57},"2026-06-29","ACTUAL",{"date":59,"type":21},"2026-08-01",{"date":61,"type":21},"2029-01",{"name":63,"class":64},"University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill","OTHER",1,{"id":67,"slug":68,"hasResults":11,"nctId":69,"briefTitle":70,"officialTitle":70,"acronym":71,"eligibilityCriteria":72,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":73,"minAge":74,"maxAge":75,"enrollmentInfo":76,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":78,"briefSummary":79,"conditions":80,"keywords":86,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":93,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":94,"startDateStruct":96,"completionDateStruct":98,"leadSponsor":100,"locationsCount":5},"100633373","a-pragmatic-clinical-trial-of-the-we-beat-well-being-education-program-in-adolescent-congenital-heart-disease-we-beat-chd-study-100633373","NCT07525843","A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of the WE BEAT Well-Being Education Program in Adolescent Congenital Heart Disease: WE BEAT CHD Study","PHN WBC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 12-17 years old\n* CHD of moderate or severe complexity (Class II\u002FIII, 2018 AHA\u002FACC ACHD, Table 4)\n* English or Spanish language proficiency\n* Receives cardiology care at a PHN or PHN auxiliary site\n* Parent or guardian and participant willing to comply with protocol and provide written\u002Felectronic informed consent and assent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* CHD of mild or simple complexity (Class I, 2018 AHA\u002FACC ACHD, Table 4)\n* Prior heart transplant to treat CHD\n* Heart disease that is not classified as structural CHD (e.g., connective tissue disease, genetic cardiomyopathy, or acquired heart disease)\n* Cognitive or developmental conditions that limit program participation and\u002For ability to complete self-reported measures as determined by a primary cardiology clinician\n* Suicidality, homicidality, or psychosis in the past 12 months as per medical chart review, clinician report, or eligibility screening\n* Medically unable to participate (e.g., intubated, unable to respond verbally, active delirium)","ALL","12 Years","17 Years",{"count":77,"type":21},390,[24],"The goal of this pragmatic clinical trial is to learn if the WE BEAT program, a 5-week group-based online wellbeing and skill-building program, can help teens with congenital heart disease (CHD) improve their ability to handle stress. The main question it aims to answer is if participants who receive the WE BEAT program become more resilient (the ability to bounce back from from tough times or recover from something difficult) and have better quality of life compared to participants who receive usual care. The study also aims to learn if there are connections between participant-reported psychosocial data (such as resilience, feelings about one's life and one's physical, mental, and social wellbeing) and clinical outcomes.\n\nEligible participants who are 12-17-year-old will be in the study for about 6 months and be randomized to receive either the WE BEAT program or usual care. Following completion of the primary WE BEAT intervention at Week 5, intervention arm participants will be randomized to a single-session booster session (occurring at Week 18) vs no booster session. The booster session will be provided in a similar format to the WE BEAT program. A review of all modules\u002Fskills introduced in the program will be provided.\n\nAll participants will complete 4 sets of online surveys and give 3 hair\u002Fsaliva samples at different timepoints. Some participants may volunteer to give optional blood and urine samples.",[81,82,83,84,35,85],"Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)","Pragmatic Trial","Adolescent Congenital Heart Disease","Resiliency-building Intervention","Telemedicine-Based Education",[87,88,89,90,91],"WE BEAT","Well-Being Education Program","Adolescent CHD","Pragmatic Clinical Trial","Telemedicine","RECRUITING","2026-06-18",{"date":95,"type":57},"2026-06-22",{"date":97,"type":57},"2026-04-20",{"date":99,"type":21},"2029-06",{"name":101,"class":64},"Carelon Research",{"id":103,"slug":104,"hasResults":11,"nctId":105,"briefTitle":106,"officialTitle":106,"acronym":107,"eligibilityCriteria":108,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":109,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":111,"briefSummary":112,"conditions":113,"keywords":115,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":122,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":123,"startDateStruct":125,"completionDateStruct":127,"leadSponsor":129,"locationsCount":65},"100639220","shame-resilience-and-well-being-after-intimate-partner-violence-an-intervention-study-with-replicated-single-subject-design-100639220","NCT07618754","Shame, Resilience and Well-being After Intimate Partner Violence: an Intervention Study With Replicated Single-Subject Design.","EMBER-4","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* subjected to IPV within 2 years prior to enrollment\n* capable of completing questionnaires using a mobile phone\n* intention to complete intervention\n* identifies as female\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ongoing severe IPV\n* ongoing severe substance use\n* psychosis\n* moderate to severe suicidality\n* ongoing psychological intervention in other facility",{"count":110,"type":21},8,[24],"The EMBER protocol is a health care method that is designed to increase resilience, in order to improve well-being and overall health in women who have experienced violence by a partner. This study explores whether the EMBER intervention works in this way. Eight participants will take part in the EMBER program and complete questionnaires every week during the intervention. The researchers will compare the timeline for the intervention to how resilience levels change. They will also check whether changes in resilience are linked to changes in health and well-being.",[114,35],"Intimate Partner Violence",[116,114,117,118,119,120,121],"Single Case Design","Domestic Violence","Domestic Violence and Abuse","Resilience, psychological","Trauma","Well-Being","2026-05-25",{"date":124,"type":57},"2026-06-01",{"date":126,"type":21},"2026-06",{"date":128,"type":21},"2030-06",{"name":130,"class":64},"Uppsala University",{"id":132,"slug":133,"hasResults":11,"nctId":134,"briefTitle":135,"officialTitle":135,"acronym":136,"eligibilityCriteria":137,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":138,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":140,"phases":4,"briefSummary":141,"conditions":142,"keywords":146,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":151,"startDateStruct":153,"completionDateStruct":155,"leadSponsor":157,"locationsCount":65},"100640395","resilience-and-recovery-after-intimate-partner-violence---evaluation-of-the-ember-ipv-protocol-100640395","NCT07606586","Resilience and Recovery After Intimate Partner Violence - Evaluation of the EMBER-IPV Protocol","EMBER-3","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Women taking part of the EMBER intervention (phase A or C)\n* Subjected to IPV within the past 2 years prior to enrollment\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Ongoing severe intimate partner violence\n* Ongoing severe substance abuse\n* Severe mental health problems such as psychosis, suicidality",{"count":139,"type":21},150,"OBSERVATIONAL","The EMBER-protocol is an intervention used at the NCK clinic at Uppsala University Hospital with the purpose of helping women utilize their resilience and strengths in order to recover after intimate partner violence. This study is conducted in order to explore how health and resilience changes during the course of the EMBER-intervention. The participants are asked to complete questionnaires before, during and after the intervention.",[114,143,144,145,35],"Intimate Partner Violence Against Women","Shame","Domestic Abuse",[114,117,147,148,144,119,149],"domestic violence exposure","gender-based violence","resilience intervention","2026-05-18",{"date":152,"type":57},"2026-05-26",{"date":154,"type":21},"2026-05",{"date":156,"type":21},"2029-04",{"name":130,"class":64},{"id":159,"slug":160,"hasResults":11,"nctId":161,"briefTitle":162,"officialTitle":163,"acronym":164,"eligibilityCriteria":165,"healthyVolunteers":166,"sex":73,"minAge":18,"maxAge":167,"enrollmentInfo":168,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":170,"briefSummary":171,"conditions":172,"keywords":174,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":180,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":181,"startDateStruct":183,"completionDateStruct":184,"leadSponsor":186,"locationsCount":65},"100636429","evaluating-a-digital-intervention-to-improve-resilience-and-reduce-stress-in-stanford-populations-100636429","NCT07565571","Evaluating a Digital Intervention to Improve Resilience and Reduce Stress in Stanford Populations","Evaluating a Digital Intervention to Improve Resilience and Reduce Stress in Stanford Populations (SIER Study)","SIER-WONE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Aged between 18 and 65 years with Stanford affiliation\n2. English proficiency with the ability to read, write, and complete surveys in English\n3. Smartphone with internet access\n4. Willingness to complete surveys and app activities\n5. Resides in the US\n6. Stanford affiliation\n7. Wearable device for Phase 1 Pilot Study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Severe psychiatric instability, defined as any of the following self-reported on the pre-enrollment screener:\n\n   1. Psychiatric hospitalization for a mental health crisis in the past 12 months.\n   2. Current mental health symptoms that significantly impair ability to function in daily life (e.g., unable to work, attend school, or care for basic needs).\n2. No smartphone or unwilling to consent.",true,"65 Years",{"count":169,"type":21},260,[24],"High-achieving academic and entrepreneurial populations face elevated risks of chronic stress, anxiety, and burnout. These populations often underutilize mental health services due to stigma, time constraints, or accessibility issues. Digital interventions provide an opportunity to deliver evidence-based stress and resilience support at scale.\n\nThe WONE (Walking on Earth, Ltd.) platform integrates personalized stress-resilience assessments, behavioral science micro-interventions, and optional wearable data feedback. This project aims to evaluate the feasibility, engagement, and preliminary efficacy of the WONE digital intervention in multiple Stanford-affiliated cohorts.",[35,173],"Mental Well-being",[175,176,177,178,179],"resilience","entrepreneurs","mental well-being","stanford","WONE","2026-04-27",{"date":182,"type":57},"2026-05-04",{"date":154,"type":21},{"date":185,"type":21},"2027-08",{"name":187,"class":64},"Stanford University",{"id":189,"slug":190,"hasResults":11,"nctId":191,"briefTitle":192,"officialTitle":193,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":194,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":73,"minAge":195,"maxAge":196,"enrollmentInfo":197,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":199,"briefSummary":200,"conditions":201,"keywords":205,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":180,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":209,"startDateStruct":211,"completionDateStruct":213,"leadSponsor":215,"locationsCount":65},"100611062","game-intervention-for-resilience-100611062","NCT07235696","Game Intervention for Resilience","A Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Impact of a Game-based Intervention in Promoting Positive Affectivity and Enhancing Psychological Resilience","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* fluency in oral and written Cantonese or Mandarin;\n* having experienced at least one major life stress in the recent 5 years (assessed by the Life Stress Index);\n* normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* formal diagnosis of any major psychiatric illnesses or history of suicidal behaviour;\n* major physical illness, neurological condition or traumatic brain injury;\n* Intake of medication within the previous 6 months that may affect emotion or cognitive functions;\n* pregnancy (for women);\n* prior experience with any commercial computer repair simulation game.","23 Years","35 Years",{"count":198,"type":21},60,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a game-based intervention can enhance psychological resilience and promote positive affectivity in adults who have experienced major life stress.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does the game-based intervention improve positive affectivity and mental health compared to a waitlist control group immediately after the intervention and at 3-month follow-up?\n* Are the mental health benefits of the game-based intervention mediated by improvements in positive affectivity over time?\n\nResearchers will compare the game-based intervention to an active control group and a waitlist control group to see if the game leads to better emotional and mental health outcomes.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Be randomly assigned to the game-based intervention group, the psychoeducation intervention group (as active control group), or the waitlist control group\n* Engage with the assigned program for 10 days within two weeks\n* Complete psychological assessments before and after the intervention, and again at 3-month follow-up",[202,203,35,204],"Chronic Stress","Trauma Exposure","Major Life Stress",[206,207,204,208],"Game-Based Intervention","Psychological Resilience","Positive Affectivity",{"date":210,"type":57},"2026-05-01",{"date":212,"type":21},"2026-07-15",{"date":214,"type":21},"2026-12-20",{"name":216,"class":64},"The University of Hong Kong",{"id":218,"slug":219,"hasResults":11,"nctId":220,"briefTitle":221,"officialTitle":222,"acronym":223,"eligibilityCriteria":224,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":140,"phases":4,"briefSummary":227,"conditions":228,"keywords":230,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":233,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":234,"startDateStruct":236,"completionDateStruct":238,"leadSponsor":240,"locationsCount":65},"100611064","how-a-resilience-focused-intervention-is-perceived-by-women-subjected-to-domestic-violence-100611064","NCT07235722","How a Resilience-Focused Intervention is Perceived by Women Subjected to Domestic Violence","Exploring Resilience. A Qualitative Study of an Intervention After Intimate Partner Violence.","EMBER-2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Enrolled in the EMBER intervention at the NCK outpatient clinic.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any situation that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.",{"count":226,"type":21},30,"At Uppsala University Hospital, there is an outpatient clinic for women subjected to intimate partner violence. In order to explore how patients experience the biopsychosocial resilience-based intervention in use at the clinic and how well the intervention fits the needs of the patients, 30 patients from different stages of their contact at the clinic and with diverse life situations and background are enrolled. The researchers will carry out individual in-person interviews, each lasting approximately 60 minutes, based on a semi-structured set of questions. The questions concern the participant´s life situation, resilience and self-perceived needs, how well the intervention has met those needs and how it was perceived by the participant. The interviews are audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis.",[144,114,229,35],"Domestic Violence Exposure",[231,232,114,117,147,148,144,35],"Qualitative","interview","2026-04-08",{"date":235,"type":57},"2026-04-13",{"date":237,"type":57},"2026-04-07",{"date":239,"type":21},"2027-03",{"name":130,"class":64},{"id":242,"slug":243,"hasResults":11,"nctId":244,"briefTitle":245,"officialTitle":246,"acronym":247,"eligibilityCriteria":248,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":73,"minAge":18,"maxAge":167,"enrollmentInfo":249,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":140,"phases":4,"briefSummary":251,"conditions":252,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":257,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":258,"startDateStruct":260,"completionDateStruct":262,"leadSponsor":264,"locationsCount":65},"100629414","gender-differences-in-depression-severity-gender-sensitive-symptoms-resilience-and-stigma-in-major-depressive-disorder-100629414","NCT07474363","Gender Differences in Depression Severity, Gender-Sensitive Symptoms, Resilience, and Stigma in Major Depressive Disorder","A Comparative Examination of Depression Severity, Gender-Sensitive Depressive Symptoms, Psychological Resilience, and Stigma Levels in Women and Men With Major Depressive Disorder","GD-GSS-R-S-MDD","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years\n* Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM-5 at the time of study participation\n* Provision of voluntary informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Intellectual disability\n* Severe neurological disorders\n* Comorbid psychiatric diagnoses\n* Depressive disorder secondary to an organic medical condition\n* Depressive disorder secondary to substance use",{"count":250,"type":21},90,"Depression is a common and serious mental health condition that affects mood, thoughts, behavior, and overall quality of life. It arises from a complex interaction of biological, psychological, and environmental factors. While depression is more frequently diagnosed in women, research suggests that men may experience and express depressive symptoms differently. Men are more likely to display symptoms such as irritability, anger, impulsivity, or increased alcohol use, and they may be less likely to seek professional psychological support due to social expectations and fear of stigma.\n\nStigma-both self-stigma (internalized negative beliefs about having a mental illness) and perceived social stigma (concerns about being judged by others)-can negatively influence individuals' willingness to seek help and adhere to treatment. In addition, psychological resilience, defined as the ability to cope effectively with stress and adversity, may play an important role in how individuals experience depressive symptoms and respond to treatment.\n\nThis study aims to compare women and men diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder in terms of depression severity, gender-sensitive depressive symptoms, self-stigma, perceived social stigma, and levels of psychological resilience. It will also examine the relationships among these factors to better understand how gender-related differences influence the experience and management of depression.\n\nFindings from this study may contribute to improved recognition of gender-specific features of depression, reduction of stigma, and the development of more individualized and effective mental health interventions for both women and men.",[253,254,35,255,256],"Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)","Gender Differences","Self Stigma","Social Stigma","2026-03-23",{"date":259,"type":57},"2026-03-25",{"date":261,"type":57},"2025-06-01",{"date":263,"type":21},"2026-11",{"name":265,"class":64},"Eskisehir Osmangazi University",{"id":267,"slug":268,"hasResults":11,"nctId":269,"briefTitle":270,"officialTitle":271,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":272,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":73,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":273,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":274,"briefSummary":275,"conditions":276,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":278,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":279,"startDateStruct":281,"completionDateStruct":283,"leadSponsor":285,"locationsCount":287},"100569464","study-teamtime---strengthening-the-team-resilience-of-hospital-staff-through-the-teamtime-intervention-100569464","NCT06694584","Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff Through the Tea(m)Time Intervention","Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff: A Quasi-experimental, Quantitative Pre-post Intervention Study","Inclusion criteria:\n\n* be at least 18 years old\n* have sufficient knowledge of German\n* are not on sick leave at time t0\n* work in one of the planned clinics\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* be younger than 18 years old\n* do not have sufficient knowledge of German\n* are on sick leave at time t0\n* do not work in one of the planned clinics",{"count":139,"type":21},[24],"Employees in hospitals are exposed to various stressors and can be at risk of psychological stress. To counteract this, resilience programs are increasingly being offered. Most interventions focus on individual resilience. In this study, the focus is on the resilience of teams. For this reason, this research paper will focus on the Tea(m)Time intervention. Tea(m)Time is a health promotion intervention that combines the risk assessment of mental stress with a focus on team resilience. In order to generate knowledge about the Tea(m)Time intervention, this study aims to identify factors that promote and inhibit its implementation and mediate its effectiveness. The aim is to gain insights into the promotion of resilience in teams. The aim is to conduct the survey of the participants in the intervention group and the control group at three different points in time.",[35,277],"Personnel, Hospital","2026-03-19",{"date":280,"type":57},"2026-03-20",{"date":282,"type":57},"2024-03-04",{"date":284,"type":21},"2026-06-30",{"name":286,"class":64},"Catholic University of Applied Sciences Mainz",3,{"id":289,"slug":290,"hasResults":11,"nctId":291,"briefTitle":292,"officialTitle":293,"acronym":294,"eligibilityCriteria":295,"healthyVolunteers":166,"sex":73,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":296,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":298,"briefSummary":299,"conditions":300,"keywords":303,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":310,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":311,"startDateStruct":313,"completionDateStruct":315,"leadSponsor":317,"locationsCount":65},"100575352","building-community-resilience-program-100575352","NCT06771167","Building Community Resilience Program","NYC Community Engagement Alliance (NYCEAL) Against COVID-19 Disparities","BCR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Able to consent\n* Able to fill out the screening RedCap short survey\n* Have access to a computer or smart gadget that will allow participant to be able to join the zoom call\n* English speaking\n* Living in NYC (5 boroughs)\n* 18+ years of age (no upper bound age limit)\n* Working with an NYCEAL CBO participating in BCR programming\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nAn individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:\n\n* Incapacitated to an extent that they are unable to comprehend a conversation or communicate effectively in a group setting\n* Unable to consent to be part of the study\n* Does not have access to a computer or smart gadget that will allow participant to be able to join the zoom call\n* Does not speak English\n* Not living in NYC\n* Not 18+ years of age\n* Not working with an NYCEAL CBO participating in BCR programming",{"count":297,"type":21},168,[24],"Established in 2021, NYCEAL consists of approximately 40 organizational partners and 120 Community Health Workers (CHWs). Over the next four years (2024-2028), NYCEAL will work with this network to implement the following intervention: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR). To assess the impact of this intervention, an implementation research framework will be used, and pre- and post-surveys conducted, and other process evaluation measures collected. Changes in outcomes measures such as stress, resilience, overall wellbeing, and other related outcomes for participants in the BCR program will be measured for community healthcare workers and\u002For frontline workers that receive educational workshops.",[35,301,302],"Burnout, Psychological","Stress, Psychological",[304,305,306,307,308,309],"Resilience","Community Health Workers","Burnout","Emotional Well-Being","Educational Workshops","Community-Based Organizations","2026-03-05",{"date":312,"type":57},"2026-03-09",{"date":314,"type":57},"2024-12-11",{"date":316,"type":21},"2027-11-15",{"name":318,"class":64},"Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai",{"id":320,"slug":321,"hasResults":11,"nctId":322,"briefTitle":323,"officialTitle":324,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":325,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":73,"minAge":74,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":326,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":328,"briefSummary":329,"conditions":330,"keywords":336,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":343,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":344,"startDateStruct":346,"completionDateStruct":348,"leadSponsor":350,"locationsCount":65},"100610511","cesikids-trial-enhancing-psychological-resilience-in-adolescents-with-cancer-100610511","NCT07228533","CesiKids Trial: Enhancing Psychological Resilience in Adolescents With Cancer","Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Nursing-Based Co-Design Intervention Program (CesiKids) to Enhance Psychological Resilience in Hospitalized Adolescents Diagnosed With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Parents have provided informed consent after receiving information,\n* The child has given assent to participate after being informed,\n* The child is between 12 and 18 years of age,\n* The child has been diagnosed with cancer and is currently receiving inpatient treatment,\n* The child is undergoing chemotherapy and\u002For radiotherapy,\n* The child is able to use a computer and\u002For smartphone,\n* The child can understand and speak Turkish.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treatment,\n* Having developed a relapse after remission,\n* Experiencing communication difficulties (e.g., intellectual disability, visual impairment, etc.),\n* Having a psychiatric diagnosis made by a psychiatrist,\n* Having experienced a significant life event affecting psychological well-being within the past four weeks (e.g., death, divorce, etc.).",{"count":327,"type":21},36,[24],"This study will develop and evaluate a mobile-based co-design intervention (CesiKids) to enhance psychosocial resilience in hospitalized adolescents aged 12-18 diagnosed with cancer. The program will be created using Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory and designed in collaboration with nurses, recovered adolescents, and parents. A randomized controlled design will be used. The intervention group will participate in a four-week structured program, while the control group will receive standard care. Psychosocial resilience and coping outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up. This research aims to offer an evidence-based, scalable model to support resilience among adolescents with cancer in clinical settings.",[35,331,332,333,334,335],"Adolescent Cancer","Mobile Application","Pediatric Cancer","Pediatric Nursing","Coping",[337,304,338,339,340,341,342],"Adolescent","Coping skills","Neoplasms","Pediatric nursing","Mobile application","Psychosocial intervention","2025-11-13",{"date":345,"type":57},"2025-11-14",{"date":347,"type":21},"2025-11",{"date":349,"type":21},"2027-06",{"name":265,"class":64},{"id":352,"slug":353,"hasResults":11,"nctId":354,"briefTitle":355,"officialTitle":355,"acronym":356,"eligibilityCriteria":357,"healthyVolunteers":166,"sex":73,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":358,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":360,"briefSummary":361,"conditions":362,"keywords":364,"overallStatus":92,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":366,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":367,"startDateStruct":369,"completionDateStruct":371,"leadSponsor":373,"locationsCount":65},"100446490","enhancing-resiliency-and-optimizing-readiness-in-military-personnel-100446490","NCT05094115","Enhancing Resiliency and Optimizing Readiness in Military Personnel","R2OE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult 18 or older\n* Male or female soldiers assigned to the 3rd SFAB\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* None",{"count":359,"type":21},600,[24],"Security Force Assistance Brigades (SFABs) are specialized United States Army units formed to train, advise, assist, enable and accompany operations with allied and partner nations. Security Force Assistance Brigades are composed of roughly 800 senior military personnel, primarily commissioned and non-commissioned officers selected from regular Army units across a wide range of military specialties. Because of the high operational tempo (OPTEMPO) of these units, individual resiliency is of utmost importance in maintaining readiness to successfully execute critical, high-stress missions. Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT) is an evidence-based intervention with strong potential to enhance resiliency by bolstering psychological flexibility along with other factors which have been demonstrated to optimize individual and group performance. This project will compare an Acceptance and Commitment Training-based resiliency-enhancement training program as compared to training as usual in 600 3rd Security Force Assistance Brigades soldiers stationed at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas. Assessment measures related to resilience will be administered before and after training as well as before and after deployment. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, and every 4 months thereafter for a total of 16-months.",[35,363],"Stress, Physiological",[365],"Psychological flexibility","2025-11-10",{"date":368,"type":57},"2025-11-12",{"date":370,"type":57},"2021-10-04",{"date":372,"type":21},"2026-09",{"name":374,"class":64},"The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio",{"id":376,"slug":377,"hasResults":11,"nctId":378,"briefTitle":379,"officialTitle":379,"acronym":380,"eligibilityCriteria":381,"healthyVolunteers":166,"sex":73,"minAge":382,"maxAge":383,"enrollmentInfo":384,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":386,"briefSummary":387,"conditions":388,"keywords":389,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":395,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":396,"startDateStruct":398,"completionDateStruct":400,"leadSponsor":402,"locationsCount":4},"100599699","combined-intervention-of-long-term-letter-mentoring-and-centralized-summer-camp-by-university-student-volunteers-for-disadvantaged-children-a-randomized-controlled-trial-100599699","NCT07087886","Combined Intervention of Long-term Letter Mentoring and Centralized Summer Camp by University Student Volunteers for Disadvantaged Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial","LWCSC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Students enrolled in Grade 7 or Grade 8 (junior middle school) in selected schools in Yuexi County, Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province.\n* Identified as \"children in adversity,\" including those from economically disadvantaged families, left-behind children, children with disabilities, or other children deemed at-risk by school officials.\n* Able to understand and complete psychological questionnaires.\n* Mentally and physically able to participate in group activities and engage in written communication.\n* Willing to participate in the study and provide informed assent.\n* Legal guardian has signed written informed consent for participation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with serious psychiatric or developmental disorders (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability) that impair comprehension or participation.\n* Currently receiving professional psychological counseling or treatment that may interfere with the study protocol.\n* Participation in other mental health interventions in the past year.\n* Planning to transfer, drop out, or leave the region during the study period.\n* Judged by the research team to be unsuitable for participation due to medical or other reasons (e.g., serious physical illness that prevents participation in camp activities).","10 Years","16 Years",{"count":385,"type":21},497,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a combined intervention of summer camp and letter-writing support works to improve psychological resilience in disadvantaged adolescents in Liangshan, Sichuan. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes the \"summer camp + letter-writing\" intervention improve resilience in adolescents who face poverty, lack of parental care, or social risks?\n\nDoes this intervention reduce depression and anxiety symptoms?\n\nResearchers will compare adolescents who join the summer camp and receive monthly letters to those who do not receive this program to see if the intervention helps their mental health and coping skills.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nAttend a 5-day summer camp that includes group games, emotion expression activities, life education, and learning support\n\nReceive monthly letters from trained university student volunteers for about 10 months after the camp. The letters will encourage them, give advice, and help them practice what they learned in the camp\n\nComplete surveys about their resilience, depression, and anxiety before the intervention, during it, at the end, and 6 months later\n\nThis study will also look at whether the program is cost-effective, meaning if it brings mental health benefits at a reasonable cost.",[35],[390,391,392,393,394],"Psychological resilience","Disadvantaged adolescents","Letter-writing support","Summer camp intervention","University student volunteers","2025-07-24",{"date":397,"type":57},"2025-07-28",{"date":399,"type":21},"2025-08-17",{"date":401,"type":21},"2026-12-30",{"name":403,"class":64},"Xiaoxuan Liu",{"id":405,"slug":406,"hasResults":11,"nctId":407,"briefTitle":408,"officialTitle":409,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":410,"healthyVolunteers":166,"sex":73,"minAge":18,"maxAge":411,"enrollmentInfo":412,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":414,"briefSummary":415,"conditions":416,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":419,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":420,"startDateStruct":422,"completionDateStruct":424,"leadSponsor":426,"locationsCount":65},"100560058","effectiveness-of-positive-psychological-intervention-on-resilience-improvement-in-nurses-100560058","NCT06572202","Effectiveness of Positive Psychological Intervention on Resilience Improvement in Nurses","Effectiveness of Positive Psychological Intervention on Resilience Improvement in Nurses: A Randomised Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. registered nurses working in clinical settings\n2. minimum of one year of work experience as a nurse\n3. availability to participate in the intervention and follow-up assessments.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Recent exposure to severe illness, trauma, or major life events in the past three months,\n2. having suffered a major traumatic event in the past 6 months,\n3. currently undergoing other forms of psychological treatment or counseling.","60 Years",{"count":413,"type":21},80,[24],"The nursing profession, comprising over 27.9 million individuals and representing 59% of the health sector, plays a critical role in frontline healthcare globally. However, nurses face significant workplace stress due to factors like high mortality rates and ethical dilemmas, which can negatively impact their mental health. Resilience has emerged as a crucial concept in mitigating workplace stress and protecting nurses' psychological well-being. Studies show a negative correlation between stress and resilience, with higher resilience linked to better psychological outcomes and lower rates of burnout. Resilience, a dynamic process of positive adaptation to stress, can be enhanced through interventions like positive psychology, which focuses on developing traits such as perseverance, interpersonal skills, and emotional stability. These interventions have been shown to reduce burnout, improve job satisfaction, and potentially enhance patient care, making them vital in addressing the unique challenges nurses face.\n\nGap of Knowledge:\n\nAlthough existing research has demonstrated the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions in reducing depression, anxiety, burnout, and stress among healthcare workers, including nurses, there is a need for more targeted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that specifically address the unique stressors and work environments of nurses. Furthermore, the long-term effects of these interventions on nurses' resilience, stress, burnout, and job satisfaction require further exploration through well-designed RCTs.\n\nResearch Aims and Hypothesis:\n\nThe present study aims to\n\n1. evaluate whether a positive psychology intervention, based on evidence-based activities from several positive psychology theories, can improve resilience in nurses, and\n2. assess whether this intervention can also enhance stress levels, reduce burnout, and improve job satisfaction among nurses.\n\nThe hypotheses are:\n\n1. the positive psychology intervention will improve nurses' resilience;\n2. the intervention will positively impact stress, burnout, and job satisfaction; and\n3. it will be more effective for nurses with low resilience in improving these outcomes.",[417,35,418],"Nurses","Positive Psychology","2024-08-24",{"date":421,"type":57},"2024-08-27",{"date":423,"type":21},"2024-09-09",{"date":425,"type":21},"2025-06-09",{"name":427,"class":64},"Fitria Endah Janitra"]