[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"robotics\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:robotics":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,46,73],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100589221","robotic-assisted-versus-manual-electrode-array-insertion-100589221",false,"NCT06951594","Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Electrode Array Insertion","Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center Study on Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Electrode Array Insertion","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Candidate for a cochlear implant according to CMS guidelines\n* Willingness to comply with all study requirements\n* Patent cochlea and normal cochlear anatomy, as confirmed by preoperative imaging\n* English speaking\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate undergoing surgery\n* Ossification or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array.\n* Unrealistic expectations on the part of the candidate and\u002For candidate's family, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the surgical procedure(s) and prosthetic devices.","ALL","18 Years","80 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},100,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Robotics-assisted electrode insertion overcomes many surgeon-related kinetic limitations such as insertion speed, tremor, drift, and lack of accurate force control. In human cadaveric cochleae, robotics-assisted electrode insertion causes less intracochlear trauma compared to manual insertion. Whether this technical advance results in functional benefits in CI patients remains unknown. To address this critical knowledge gap, the investigators will compare cochlear trauma assessed using CT scans, cochlear and AN function assessed using ECochG and\u002For the eCAP, and clinical outcomes quantified by postoperative residual acoustic hearing and speech perception scores between participants randomized to either manual or robotics-assisted electrode array insertion.",[27,28],"Cochlear Implantation","Robotics",[30,31,32],"cochlear implantation","robotics","hearing preservation","RECRUITING","2025-07-15",{"date":36,"type":37},"2025-07-17","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":37},"2025-06-30",{"date":41,"type":21},"2028-08-31",{"name":43,"class":44},"University of Iowa","OTHER",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":65,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":66,"startDateStruct":68,"completionDateStruct":70,"leadSponsor":71,"locationsCount":45},"100589156","effects-of-robotic-gloves-along-with-task-oriented-mirror-therapy-on-motor-functions-of-hands-in-sub-acute-stroke-patients-100589156","NCT06950749","Effects of Robotic Gloves Along With Task-oriented Mirror Therapy on Motor Functions of Hands in Sub-acute Stroke Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 40 years and above.\n* Ischemic (MCA) stroke.\n* Male and females both.\n* Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA score \\>24 points).\n* Motor power of proximal upper Extremity at least 3 with ability to reach out.\n* FMA score for upper Extremity below 47\n* Modified Ashworth spasticity score \\\u003C2 in hands and finger joints.\n* Ability to sit for at least 60 minutes\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Musculoskeletal problems such as severe pain in any joints of the paretic upper extremity.\n* Contractures in shoulder, elbow, hand or finger joints.\n* Severe Visual impairments.","40 Years",{"count":54,"type":21},30,[24],"This study is randomized control trial and purpose of this study is to find effects of robotic gloves assisted task-oriented mirror therapy in comparison with task-oriented mirror therapy on motor functions of hand in sub-acute stroke patients.",[58,59,28,60],"Stroke","Mirror Therapy","Neurorehabilitation",[62,63,31,64],"stroke","mirror therapy","neurorehabilitation","2025-04-27",{"date":67,"type":37},"2025-04-30",{"date":69,"type":37},"2024-10-12",{"date":67,"type":21},{"name":72,"class":44},"Foundation University Islamabad",{"id":74,"slug":75,"hasResults":11,"nctId":76,"briefTitle":77,"officialTitle":78,"acronym":79,"eligibilityCriteria":80,"healthyVolunteers":81,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":82,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":84,"briefSummary":85,"conditions":86,"keywords":88,"overallStatus":90,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":91,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":92,"startDateStruct":94,"completionDateStruct":96,"leadSponsor":98,"locationsCount":4},"100531660","sp-robotic-versus-vats-anatomical-pulmonary-resection-for-patients-with-nsclc-100531660","NCT06202690","SP Robotic Versus VATS Anatomical Pulmonary Resection for Patients With NSCLC","Single-POrt Robotic Versus Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Anatomical Pulmonary Resection for Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (SPORTS Study): a Single-center, Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial","SPORTS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Candidate for anatomical pulmonary resection (segmentectomy or lobectomy) via minimally invasive thoracic surgery (RATS or VATS) for patient with non-small cell lung cancer or suspected malignant lesion.\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Patients who can comply with the requirements of the clinical trial and who, or their legal representatives, provide written consent before the start of the clinical trial\n* Patients with the nationality of South Korea\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists score 1-3.\n* Clinical stage I, II or IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who require surgery for accompanying other organ diseases\n* Tumor invasion into the chest wall, diaphragm, another lobe or diaphragm\n* Patients who are considered unsuitable based on the researcher's judgment\n* Patients with cognitive impairments who are unable to understand the instructions and informed consent of this study\n* Patients who specifically desire a certain surgical method (robotic, thoracoscopic, open thoracotomy)\n* Patients who previously undergone a thoracic surgical procedure in the hemithorax to be operated on\n* Pathological results other than NSCLC (ex, benign nodules, metastatic lung cancer, SCLC)\n* Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy.\n* Candidate for pneumonectomy, bilobectomy, lobectomy plus segmentectomy, non-anatomic resection (ex, wedge resection).\n* History of other cancers in the past 5 years.",true,{"count":83,"type":21},290,[24],"Single-POrt Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery versus single-port video-assisted Thoracic Surgery major pulmonary resection for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (SPORTS trial): a single-center, a single blinded, randomized controlled trial",[28,87],"Lung Cancer",[89],"sing-port surgery, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, lung cancer","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2024-01-01",{"date":93,"type":37},"2024-01-11",{"date":95,"type":21},"2024-01-09",{"date":97,"type":21},"2031-06-30",{"name":99,"class":44},"Korea University Guro Hospital"]