[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"sensory-disorder\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:sensory-disorder":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,56,97],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":43,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":44,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":45,"startDateStruct":48,"completionDateStruct":50,"leadSponsor":52,"locationsCount":55},"100294151","accuracy-of-the-sensory-test-using-the-laryngopharyngeal-endoscopic-esthesiometer-in-obstructive-sleep-apnea-100294151",false,"NCT03109171","Accuracy of the Sensory Test Using the Laryngopharyngeal Endoscopic Esthesiometer in Obstructive Sleep Apnea","Accuracy of the Sensory Test Performed Using the Laryngopharyngeal Endoscopic Esthesiometer and Rangefinder in Patients With Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Hypopnea (OSA): a Prospective Double-blinded, Randomised, Pilot Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients being 18 years old or more referred to the sleep laboratory of a tertiary care university hospital for a baseline polysomnography for suspected OSA.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Anticoagulation (though not a contraindication for the endoscopic laryngopharyngeal sensory test, anticoagulation is an exclusion criteria for this validation study in order to keep it a minimal-risk study).\n* Bleeding diathesis.\n* Basal awake oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry below 88%.\n* Not agree to participate in the study.\n* Glasgow coma scale below of 15 (to avoid confusion with involvement of laryngopharyngeal reflexes due to neurological disease accompanied by decreased level of consciousness).\n* Baseline polysomnography that does not meet validity criteria to be interpreted (according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine).\n* Baseline polysomnography performed more than 15 days before the sensory testing. Ordinarily, the sensory testing will be performed the same day or the next day of baseline polysomnography.\n* More than 5% of total apnoea events being of central origin.\n* History of maxillofacial or pharyngeal surgery (to avoid confusion with involvement of laryngopharyngeal reflexes due to surgery in this region).\n* Laryngopharyngeal tract malignancies (to avoid confusion with involvement of laryngopharyngeal reflexes due to tumours).\n* Central Nervous System (CNS) surgery in the last three months or that has left neurological sequelae (to avoid confusion with involvement of laryngopharyngeal reflexes due to sequelae of CNS surgery).\n* Traumatic brain injury in the last three months or more than three month with neurological sequelae.\n* History of active neuromuscular disease that affects the muscles of head and neck or with sequels present at the time of the sensory testing (to avoid confusion with involvement of laryngopharyngeal reflexes due to neuromuscular disease).\n* History of cerebrovascular disease (to avoid confusion with dysphagia or sensory compromise secondary to cerebrovascular disease).\n* Diabetes (to avoid confusion with diabetic neuropathy that compromises the laryngopharyngeal region).\n* Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids at a dose greater or equal to 20 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent (to avoid confusion with steroid myopathy that compromises the laryngopharyngeal region).\n* Upper respiratory tract infection within 15 days prior to the testing (to avoid confusion with neuropathy associated with respiratory viral disease that compromises the laryngopharyngeal region).\n* Patient's inability to cooperate during the examination (to avoid measurement error caused by the lack of cooperation of the patient).",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},117,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This is a prospective double blinded randomized crossover controlled trial aiming at validating the measurement of laryngopharyngeal mechanosensitivity in patients with suspected OSA using a recently developed laryngopharyngeal endoscopic esthesiometer and rangefinder (LPEER).\n\nSubjects will be recruited from patients with suspected OSA referred for baseline polysomnography to a university hospital sleep laboratory. Intra- and inter-rater reliability will be evaluated using the Bland-Altman's limits of agreement plot, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient, depending on the distribution of the variables. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluate plotting Receiver-operating-characteristic-curves (ROC-curves) using as reference standard basal polysomnogram. The sensory threshold values for patients with mild, moderate, and severe OSA, will be determined and compared using ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test, depending on the distribution of the variables.",[27,28,29],"Sleep Apnea, Obstructive","Larynx","Sensory Disorder",[31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42],"Endoscopy","Lasers","Fiber Optic Technology","Bronchoscopy","Esthesiometer","Mechanoreceptors","Diagnosis","Reflex","Reproducibility of Results","Reliability of Results","Validity of Results","Sensory Thresholds","RECRUITING","2026-01-06",{"date":46,"type":47},"2026-01-08","ACTUAL",{"date":49,"type":47},"2018-01-01",{"date":51,"type":21},"2026-11-30",{"name":53,"class":54},"Fundación Neumologica Colombiana","OTHER",2,{"id":57,"slug":58,"hasResults":11,"nctId":59,"briefTitle":60,"officialTitle":61,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":62,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":63,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":65,"phases":4,"briefSummary":66,"conditions":67,"keywords":76,"overallStatus":43,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":88,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":89,"startDateStruct":91,"completionDateStruct":93,"leadSponsor":95,"locationsCount":55},"100523328","prospective-study-of-sensation-and-satisfaction-in-cancer-and-transgender-mastectomy-patients-100523328","NCT06094257","Prospective Study of Sensation and Satisfaction in Cancer and Transgender Mastectomy Patients","Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Sensory Outcome, Development of Chronic Pain and Phantom Pain, as Well as Patient Satisfaction in Cancer and Transgender Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Reconstruction With and Without Reinnervation.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age over 18\n* Patient is scheduled for gender mastectomy surgery (including nipple sparing mastectomy and mastectomy with free nipple graft) or NSM with breast implant or autologous reconstruction\n* Patient is capable and willing to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient has a nerve condition that does not allow for assessment of sensation\n* Any subject who at the discretion of the Investigator is not suitable for inclusion in the study or is unlikely to comply with follow-up schedule\n* Currently prescribed medication known to impact nerve regeneration or to cause peripheral neuropathy\n* Bilateral reconstruction with non-uniform treatment (i.e. 1 reconstructed breast is non-neurotized, 1 reconstructed breast is neurotized)",{"count":64,"type":21},400,"OBSERVATIONAL","During breast surgery, sensory nerves are cut which may lead to reduced sensation and pain. Surgical reinnervation techniques have been developed with the aim of improving postoperative sensation by preserving the nerves and connecting them to the nipple and areola. The investigators aim to compare postoperative sensation and patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing reinnervation versus those not undergoing reinnervation to determine if there is a difference. The investigators will investigate this in patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy, implant-based breast reconstruction and autologous breast reconstruction. The investigators will use various tools that measure sensation quantitatively.",[68,69,70,71,72,29,73,74,75],"Sensation Disorders","Sensation, Phantom","Pain, Postoperative","Pain, Chronic","Numbness","Sensory Defect","Phantom Pain","Phantom Sensation",[77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87],"Sensation","Reinnervation","Peripheral nerve","Reconstruction","Breast reinnervation","Chest reinnervation","Gender-affirming mastectomy","Breast reconstruction","Peripheral nerve repair","Targeted nipple areolar complex","Targeted nipple areolar complex reinnervation","2025-08-26",{"date":90,"type":47},"2025-08-27",{"date":92,"type":47},"2022-02-09",{"date":94,"type":21},"2033-03",{"name":96,"class":54},"Weill Medical College of Cornell University",{"id":98,"slug":99,"hasResults":11,"nctId":100,"briefTitle":101,"officialTitle":102,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":103,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":104,"targetDuration":106,"studyType":65,"phases":4,"briefSummary":107,"conditions":108,"keywords":109,"overallStatus":114,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":115,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":116,"startDateStruct":118,"completionDateStruct":120,"leadSponsor":122,"locationsCount":4},"100560934","identifying-barriers-to-implementing-sensory-strategies-in-the-classroom-setting-100560934","NCT06583603","Identifying Barriers to Implementing Sensory Strategies in the Classroom Setting","Identifying Barriers to Implementing Sensory Strategies in the Classroom Setting: a Teacher&#39;s Perspective","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 18 years or older\n* Active teacher or paraprofessional working in the classroom\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Younger than 18 years old\n* Teachers or paraprofessionals no longer actively working in the classroom setting",{"count":105,"type":21},365,"365 Days","The goal of this clinical trial is to determine barriers to implementing sensory strategies in the classroom setting as well as potential supports needed in teachers and paraprofessionals 18 years and older who are actively working in the classroom setting. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1. What are common themes that limit classroom staff from implementing sensory strategies within the classroom setting?\n2. What support do classroom staff need from an occupational therapist to feel confident in implementing sensory strategies within their classroom?\n\nParticipants will be asked to participate in a 17-item electronic survey via Google Forms. They will be asked to provide informed consent prior to participating.",[29],[110,111,112,113],"sensory processing","classroom setting","sensory strategies or sensory treatment","maladaptive behaviors or challenging behaviors","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2024-08-31",{"date":117,"type":47},"2024-09-04",{"date":119,"type":21},"2024-09-06",{"date":121,"type":21},"2024-11-01",{"name":123,"class":54},"Bay Path University"]