[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"shoulder-dislocation\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:shoulder-dislocation":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,11,0,[8,48,79,103,125,145,170,192,215,244,270],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100641606","sling-vs-dynamic-shoulder-stabilizer-after-soft-tissue-shoulder-instability-surgery-slidy-100641606",false,"NCT07644624","Sling vs. Dynamic Shoulder Stabilizer After Soft Tissue Shoulder Instability Surgery (SLIDY)","Sling vs. Dynamic Shoulder Stabilizer After Soft Tissue Shoulder Instability Surgery (\"SLIDY\"): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Feasibility, Early Functional Recovery, and Structural Healing","SLIDY","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization for anterior shoulder instability (Bankart repair ± Hill-Sachs remplissage).\n* Ability and willingness to comply with the study protocol and scheduled follow-ups.\n* Provision of written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Significant glenoid bone loss requiring bony augmentation procedures (e.g., bone block procedures, Latarjet).\n* Concomitant rotator cuff repair or fracture fixation.\n* Contraindication to MRI (e.g., pacemaker, claustrophobia, incompatible implants).\n* Cognitive impairment, language barriers, or logistical inability to attend follow-up visits.\n* Previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This randomized controlled trial seeks to address a significant clinical gap by evaluating the outcomes of two postoperative immobilization methods following arthroscopic soft tissue surgery for anterior shoulder instability: a standard static arm sling and a dynamic shoulder orthosis.",[27,28,29],"Anterior Shoulder Instability","Shoulder Instability","Shoulder Dislocation",[31,32,33,34,35],"Arthroscopic Bankart Repair","Hill-Sachs Remplissage","Dynamic Shoulder Orthosis","Postoperative Immobilization","Shoulder Rehabilitation","RECRUITING","2026-06-15",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-06-17","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":40},{"date":43,"type":21},"2028-06-15",{"name":45,"class":46},"Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":53,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":55,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":78},"100424604","open-versus-arthroscopic-stabilization-of-shoulder-instability-with-subcritical-bone-loss-the-oasis-trial-100424604","NCT04809064","Open Versus Arthroscopic Stabilization of Shoulder Instability With Subcritical Bone Loss: The OASIS Trial","OASIS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Civilians and military personnel ages 17 to 50\n* Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation\n* Associated subcritical bone loss between 10-20% less the glenoid width quantified by standard of care CT scan, MRI, or 3D-MRI scan\n* Had shoulder instability surgery using either 1) arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage of Hill-Sachs lesion; 2) open Bankart; or 3) Latarjet\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Chronic, non-traumatic multi-directional instability based on clinical exam\n* Concurrent shoulder injury in the involved shoulder (e.g., rotator cuff tears, motor nerve pathologies, osteoarthritis of a Samilson-Prieto grade \\>2)\n* Have a history of shoulder surgery in the involved shoulder (prior instability surgery that included any of the following and the planned procedure would be a repeat of the index procedure: 1) arthroscopic Bankart repair with a remplissage of Hill-Sachs lesion, 2) open Bankart, or 3) Latarjet \\[previous isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair only would not be an exclusion criterion\\], rotator cuff repair, intra-articular soft tissue surgery); rotator cuff repair, intra-articular soft tissue surgery)\n* Prior rotator cuff procedure on involved shoulder (including intra-articular soft tissue surgery\n* Humeral sided bone lesions (Hill-Sachs lesion) that is sufficiently large enough to render the lesion \"off-track\" even after a bony augmentation procedure would be performed\n* Neuromuscular, neurological and other movement control pathologies including seizures\n* Vascular injury associated with the shoulder trauma that compromise adequate\u002Fnormal healing or interferes with usual course of care\n* Traumatic brain injury or any condition that would preclude the ability to comply with post-operative guidelines\n* Cartilage lesion finding in the involved shoulder that would interfere with usual course of care\n* Known pregnancy at time of imagining and\u002For surgery based upon standard of care testing procedures\n* Any issue with the contralateral shoulder that would preclude participation in research procedures\n* Any condition in the opinion of the investigator\u002Fclinician that would preclude or limit full participation in study activities\n* Absence of a fixed address or no means of contact\n* Known inability to be available at all follow-up time points\n* Does not plan to return to pre-injury levels of work, sports or military duty","17 Years","50 Years",{"count":58,"type":21},450,"OBSERVATIONAL","This clinical trial will determine the outcome trajectories of common surgeries (arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage of a Hill-Sachs lesion, open Bankart, Latarjet) with post-operative rehabilitation and identification of prognostic factors among patients with acute or recurrent anterior shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss. The results of the study assist in optimizing time to return to military duty, work and sports, and patient-reported physical function for military personnel and civilians with traumatic anterior shoulder instability and 10-20% glenoid bone loss. This study will provide a critical clinical advancement of a previously unaddressed and common clinical scenario.",[29,62,63],"Glenohumeral Dislocation","Anterior Shoulder Dislocation",[27,65,66,67,68],"Glenoid Bone Loss","Stabilization Surgery","Return to Duty or Sport","Rehabilitation","2026-06-04",{"date":71,"type":40},"2026-06-08",{"date":73,"type":40},"2022-01-24",{"date":75,"type":21},"2027-09-30",{"name":77,"class":46},"University of Pittsburgh",15,{"id":80,"slug":81,"hasResults":11,"nctId":82,"briefTitle":83,"officialTitle":84,"acronym":85,"eligibilityCriteria":86,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":88,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":90,"briefSummary":91,"conditions":92,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":93,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":94,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":95,"startDateStruct":97,"completionDateStruct":99,"leadSponsor":101,"locationsCount":47},"100628295","early-arthroscopic-stabilization-versus-rehabilitation-of-the-shoulder-in-adolescents-with-a-traumatic-first-time-anterior-shoulder-dislocation-episode-100628295","NCT07459777","Early arthroscoPic Stabilization veRsus rehabilitatiOn of the Shoulder in Adolescents With a trauMatic First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ePisode.","Early arthroscoPic Stabilization veRsus rehabilitatiOn of the Shoulder in Adolescents With a trauMatic First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ePisode: A Pilot Prospective CohorT Study (PROMPT-Cohort)","PROMPTCohort","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Males and females between the ages of 12 and 18, inclusive\n2. Patients with a first-time traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation within the past 5 months\n3. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation confirmed by radiography, reduction required by medical personnel, or demonstration of anterior apprehension on physical examination following injury to the shoulder\n4. MRI or MRA demonstrating disruption of the glenohumeral soft tissues (including the labrum, periosteum, or inferior glenohumeral ligament)34 relating to instability\n5. Patients who have the ability to speak, understand, and read the language of the clinical site\n6. Provision of informed consent (age 18) or parental consent (ages 12-17, inclusive)\n7. Provision of informed child assent (ages 12-17, inclusive)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Previous dislocation episodes or instability of the affected shoulder\n2. Previous surgeries involving the affected shoulder\n3. History or clinical exam findings of generalized ligamentous laxity (defined as a Beighton score of 4 or more points)35\n4. History of multi-directional instability of either shoulder\n5. Concomitant fracture of the tuberosity, humerus, or glenoid (excluding a Bankart or Hill Sachs lesion)\n6. Bony Bankart lesion exceeding 15% of the glenoid surface (using the best-fit circle method on MRI)36\n7. Hill Sachs lesion exceeding 15% of the humeral diameter (Measured on transaxial slice of MRI similar to Salomonsson et al.)37\n8. A neurological injury of the affected arm\n9. Patients who will likely have problems, in the judgement of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up\n10. Any other reason(s) the investigator feels is relevant for excluding the patient","12 Years",{"count":89,"type":21},30,[24],"Each year within Canada and the US, more than 30,000 children and adolescents will have an injury to their shoulder resulting in a shoulder dislocation. Although the current practice is to manage this initial dislocation without surgery, the vast majority of these children and adolescents will, unfortunately continue to have instability episodes of their shoulder. Recurrent instability can cause damage to the bones and cartilage that form the shoulder resulting in potentially more difficult surgical stabilization, and possibly long-term sequela. To that effect, there is increasing interest to consider early surgical stabilization in this population. This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the feasibility of conducting a larger RCT assessing the effect of early arthroscopic stabilization compared to rehabilitation on the rate of repeat shoulder dislocations (recurrent instability), pain, and shoulder function among adolescents (aged 12-18 years) with first-time shoulder dislocations. These patients will be followed for one year.",[29],"NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-03-09",{"date":96,"type":40},"2026-03-11",{"date":98,"type":21},"2026-04-01",{"date":100,"type":21},"2028-08-01",{"name":102,"class":46},"McMaster University",{"id":104,"slug":105,"hasResults":11,"nctId":106,"briefTitle":107,"officialTitle":108,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":109,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":110,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":111,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":113,"briefSummary":114,"conditions":115,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":116,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":117,"startDateStruct":119,"completionDateStruct":121,"leadSponsor":123,"locationsCount":47},"100279130","latarjet-versus-modified-eden-hybinette-for-anterior-shoulder-dislocation-100279130","NCT02913352","Latarjet Versus Modified Eden-Hybinette for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation","Randomized Trial for the Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder: Latarjet Versus Modified Eden-Hybinette","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of one or more previous episodes of traumatic glenohumeral dislocation;\n* Anterior glenoid bone loss superior to 20% of its diameter, regardless of the ISIS score;\n* Recurrence of glenohumeral dislocation in cases previously treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair, regardless of the ISIS score and severity of bone lesion of the glenoid;\n* Borderline bipolar bone lesions:\n* Instability Severity Index Score of (ISIS) greater than or equal to 4 points, with anterior glenoid bone loss (bone Bankart lesion) greater than 13.5% of their diameter, measured by the method described by Sugaya et al.;\n* Hill-Sachs lesion and glenoid considered \"off-track\".\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Hill-Sachs lesion greater than 40% of the humeral head diameter (measured by the preoperative CT);\n* Untreated seizures;\n* Previously diagnosed rotator cuff complete tear;\n* Fractures of the proximal humerus (except for Hill-Sachs lesions);\n* Multidirectional instability;\n* Advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis (grade 3 Samilson and Pietro)","16 Years",{"count":112,"type":21},60,[24],"Randomized clinical trial, parallel 1:1, comparing Latarjet to Modified Eden-Hybinette (iliac bone crest + capsular repair) for recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation.",[29],"2026-01-27",{"date":118,"type":40},"2026-01-29",{"date":120,"type":4},"2016-09-01",{"date":122,"type":21},"2029-12-01",{"name":124,"class":46},"University of Sao Paulo",{"id":126,"slug":127,"hasResults":11,"nctId":128,"briefTitle":129,"officialTitle":130,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":131,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":132,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":134,"conditions":135,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":93,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":136,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":137,"startDateStruct":139,"completionDateStruct":141,"leadSponsor":143,"locationsCount":4},"100615448","arthroscopic-subscapularis-augmentation-100615448","NCT07292740","Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation","Arthroscopic Glenoid Augmentation Using Upper Subscapularis Tendon In Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Patients complaining of anterior glenoid instability , with 1 or more episodes of anterior shoulder dislocation.\n\n  2\\. Associated limited (\\\u003C13.5%) to subcritical (\\\u003C25%) glenoid bone loss. 3. Positive anterior shoulder apprehension and pain refractory to conservative treatment.\n\n  4\\. Age between (15 -49)years old\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Preexisting glenohumeral osteoarthritis, Infection 2. Multidirectional or voluntary shoulder instability. 3.. Acute proximal humerus fractures of the involved shoulder. 4.. refusable of patient",{"count":133,"type":21},20,"The glenohumeral joint is the most commonly dislocated joint of the human body, The stability of GH joint relies on a complex network of static and dynamic structures.\n\nStatic stabilizers ::",[29],"2025-12-06",{"date":138,"type":40},"2025-12-18",{"date":140,"type":21},"2026-01-01",{"date":142,"type":21},"2026-09-01",{"name":144,"class":46},"Al-Azhar University",{"id":146,"slug":147,"hasResults":11,"nctId":148,"briefTitle":149,"officialTitle":150,"acronym":151,"eligibilityCriteria":152,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":153,"maxAge":154,"enrollmentInfo":155,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":157,"briefSummary":158,"conditions":159,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":162,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":163,"startDateStruct":165,"completionDateStruct":167,"leadSponsor":169,"locationsCount":47},"100494195","rct-evaluating-first-time-shoulder-dislocation-100494195","NCT05715021","RCT Evaluating First Time Shoulder Dislocation","Randomized Trial Evaluating First Time Shoulder Dislocation: Surgery vs Conservative Care","REDUCE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients ages 14-40 years;\n2. Diagnosis of first-time shoulder anterior dislocation having occurred within the past 3 months confirmed either by radiographic evidence or documented reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation as well as physical examination eliciting unwanted glenohumeral translation with reproduction of symptoms;\n3. Provision of informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients that cannot undergo surgery or anesthesia;\n2. Patients with concomitant injuries (rotator cuff tear, fracture)\n3. Previous shoulder surgery;\n4. Patients that will likely have problems with maintaining follow-up or are incarcerated;\n5. Epilepsy\u002Fseizure disorder;\n6. Pregnancy;\n7. Diagnosis of multidirectional instability;\n8. Bony glenoid defect (bony Bankart) \\>10% as measured on preop imaging;\n9. Dislocation without trauma, in a context of hyper laxity or atraumatic instability;\n10. Cases involving litigation or workplace insurance claims (e.g., WSIB).","14 Years","40 Years",{"count":156,"type":21},100,[24],"The primary objective of the pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a definitive trial to determine the effect of arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization vs. non-operative management on the risk of recurrent anterior dislocation rates and functional outcomes following in patients presenting with a first-time dislocation (FTD) over a 24-month period.",[29,160,161],"Sport Injury","Anterior Dislocation","2025-09-23",{"date":164,"type":40},"2025-09-26",{"date":166,"type":40},"2023-07-12",{"date":168,"type":21},"2028-03-01",{"name":102,"class":46},{"id":171,"slug":172,"hasResults":11,"nctId":173,"briefTitle":174,"officialTitle":175,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":176,"healthyVolunteers":177,"sex":17,"minAge":87,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":178,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":180,"briefSummary":181,"conditions":182,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":93,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":183,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":184,"startDateStruct":186,"completionDateStruct":188,"leadSponsor":190,"locationsCount":47},"100480143","conservative-versus-operative---first-time-shoulder-dislocations-100480143","NCT05532150","Conservative Versus Operative - First Time Shoulder Dislocations","Conservative Versus Operative Management of First Time Shoulder Dislocations","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* patients 12 and older\n* seen by the Columbia University Shoulder Elbow and Sports Medicine Service\n* first time anterior shoulder dislocation diagnosis\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* humeral avulsion during arthroscopy\n* bony defect \\> 25% of glenoid surface\n* general anesthesia contraindication\n* previous shoulder surgery\n* inability or unwillingness to adhere to study participate\n* lost to follow up",true,{"count":179,"type":21},200,[24],"There is no consensus regarding whether rehabilitation or surgical stabilization leads to optimized outcomes for treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocations. This prospective, randomized controlled trial therefore aims to compare arthroscopic Bankart repair versus physical therapy for the treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocations.",[29],"2025-09-16",{"date":185,"type":40},"2025-09-22",{"date":187,"type":21},"2026-09",{"date":189,"type":21},"2032-09",{"name":191,"class":46},"Columbia University",{"id":193,"slug":194,"hasResults":11,"nctId":195,"briefTitle":196,"officialTitle":197,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":198,"healthyVolunteers":177,"sex":17,"minAge":110,"maxAge":154,"enrollmentInfo":199,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":201,"briefSummary":202,"conditions":203,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":206,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":207,"startDateStruct":209,"completionDateStruct":211,"leadSponsor":213,"locationsCount":47},"100489835","latarjet-vs-anatomic-glenoid-reconstruction-100489835","NCT05658289","Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction","Latarjet vs Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction for Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss: a Prospective Multi-centre Randomized Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with one or more instances of anterior shoulder dislocation; pre-operative CT scan illustrating \\>20% bone loss.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* posterior shoulder instability; multidirectional shoulder instability; massive rotator cuff teats (MRI proven); history of substance abuse, patients unable to provide informed consent, patients refusing randomization.",{"count":200,"type":21},68,[24],"Anterior shoulder dislocations occur when the humeral head translates anterior to the glenoid cause pain, stiffness, and glenoid bone loss. If left untreated, the risk of recurrence can be up to or greater than 90%. The only surgically modifiable factor to reduce the risk of recurrence is the glenoid bone loss (GBL), where surgeons have the ability to recreate the shape of the glenoid and reduce the risk of recurrent shoulder dislocations.\n\nEstablished boney procedures for shoulder instability include the Latarjet and free bone block procedures, such as the Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AGR). The Latarjet is well known for its lower rate of recurrent instability, but raises concerns due to under-appreciated complications rates. The AGR is a newer surgical approach that has garnered attention for its low rate of recurrent instability and complication profile. Both treatments can reduce pain, increase function following surgery and reduce the risk of recurrent instability. However, these two established approaches have yet to be directly compared and studied on a larger scale.\n\nThe purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes pre- and post-operatively between the Latarjet to the AGR.",[29,204,205],"Bone Loss","Arthroscopy","2024-08-20",{"date":208,"type":40},"2024-08-22",{"date":210,"type":40},"2023-04-24",{"date":212,"type":21},"2026-12",{"name":214,"class":46},"Nova Scotia Health Authority",{"id":216,"slug":217,"hasResults":11,"nctId":218,"briefTitle":219,"officialTitle":220,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":221,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":222,"targetDuration":224,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":225,"conditions":226,"keywords":229,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":235,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":236,"startDateStruct":238,"completionDateStruct":240,"leadSponsor":242,"locationsCount":47},"100556936","anterior-shoulder-dislocation-at-emergency-department-100556936","NCT06531590","Anterior Shoulder Dislocation at Emergency Department","Emergency Department Management of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients aged 18 years and older\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients who are not conscious at the time of admission and do not consent to participate in the study.\n\nPatients who do not have follow-up in our healthcare system or cannot be followed up.\n\nPatients with allergies to opioids or local anesthetics. Patients presenting to the emergency department with suspicion of multiple fractures and dislocations involving ≥2 different types of injuries will also be excluded from the study.\n\nForensic cases",{"count":223,"type":21},140,"1 Day","In this study, investigator will analyze the demographic characteristics of patients presenting to emergency department with Anterior Shoulder Dislocation. Investigators will document the mechanism of injury, orthopedic classification of shoulder dislocation, associated treatments, pre-procedural pain scoring, post-procedural pain scoring, as well as the duration of emergency department stay related to the preferred treatment, orthopedic consultation, and patient outcomes (discharge, admission to ward or intensive care unit, mortality). Aim of the study to investigate whether the current treatments used provide any superiority in emergency department outcomes for patients",[29,227,228],"Analgesia","Pain, Shoulder",[230,231,232,233,234],"shoulder dislocation","interscalene nerve block","suprascapular nerve block","intraarticular lidocaine injection","emergency department","2024-07-29",{"date":237,"type":40},"2024-08-01",{"date":239,"type":40},"2024-03-01",{"date":241,"type":21},"2026-03-01",{"name":243,"class":46},"Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi",{"id":245,"slug":246,"hasResults":11,"nctId":247,"briefTitle":248,"officialTitle":249,"acronym":250,"eligibilityCriteria":251,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":252,"enrollmentInfo":253,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":255,"briefSummary":256,"conditions":257,"keywords":258,"overallStatus":93,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":261,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":262,"startDateStruct":264,"completionDateStruct":266,"leadSponsor":268,"locationsCount":4},"100549173","blood-flow-restriction-in-post-surgery-rehabilitation-of-latarjet-procedure-100549173","NCT06430567","Blood Flow Restriction in Post-surgery Rehabilitation of Latarjet Procedure","Comparing the Effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction Training and Traditional Resistance Training in Post-surgery Rehabilitation of Latarjet Procedure","BFR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: 18-35 years\n* Indication for shoulder stabilization surgery using the Latarjet procedure (documented anterior dislocations with proof of emergency reduction, with or without hypermobility and confirmation of traumatic capsulo-ligamentous injury by MRI).\n* Regular exercise (min. 1x \u002F week)\n* Signed the informed consent form for the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding women\n* Active oncological disease under treatment. (Patient with stable oncological disease eligible)\n* Adverse events during the 6-week post-operative period such as:-Fracture\u002Fdisplacement of the reconstructed bone-Luxation of the operated shoulder-Requirement for emergency hospitalization\n* History of deep vein thrombosis\u002Fpulmonary embolism\n* Inability to follow study procedures, due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia.\n* Need for skin grafting following shoulder stabilization surgery\n* Coronary heart disease\n* Unstable hypertension\n* Peripheral vascular disease\n* Hypercoagulable states (blood coagulation disorders)\n* Left ventricular dysfunction\n* Hemophilia","35 Years",{"count":254,"type":21},50,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training on post-surgery rehabilitation following the Latarjet procedure in athletes aged 18-35.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes BFR training improve scapular belt muscle strength post-surgery? Does BFR training enhance shoulder function during rehabilitation?\n\nResearchers will compare three groups:\n\nBFR Group with 50% AOP \\[arterial occlusion pressure\\] compression BFR Placebo Group with 10% AOP compression Control Group\n\nParticipants will:\n\nPerform the same four strengthening exercises twice a week Complete 16 semi-autonomous strength training sessions over 8 weeks Undergo isokinetic and isometric strength tests, shoulder mobility assessments, and complete self-assessment questionnaires.",[29],[259,260,68],"Blood flow restriction","Latarjet surgery","2024-05-21",{"date":263,"type":40},"2024-05-28",{"date":265,"type":21},"2024-06-10",{"date":267,"type":21},"2027-06-30",{"name":269,"class":46},"Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte",{"id":271,"slug":272,"hasResults":11,"nctId":273,"briefTitle":274,"officialTitle":274,"acronym":275,"eligibilityCriteria":276,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":277,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":59,"phases":4,"briefSummary":279,"conditions":280,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":93,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":282,"startDateStruct":284,"completionDateStruct":286,"leadSponsor":288,"locationsCount":290},"100488063","chronic-anterior-shoulder-instability-in-the-military-100488063","NCT05635240","Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability in the Military","EPAULUX","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Military member with a first episode of true anterior glenohumeral shoulder dislocation,\n* Male or female,\n* Major,\n* Having a sufficient level of reading\u002Fwriting of the French language,\n* Did not object to participating in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with a history of homolateral shoulder dislocation or surgery on the affected shoulder,\n* Collagen disease confirmed by genetic testing,\n* Inflammatory arthropathy,\n* History of rotator cuff injury,\n* Insufficient French reading\u002Fwriting skills,\n* Under legal protection,\n* Objection to participating in the study.",{"count":278,"type":21},120,"Anterior shoulder instability is a chronic condition that occurs after an anteromedial dislocation. Its prevalence is high in athletes but has been little studied in the armed forces. In general, patients with a first episode of dislocation have a 1 in 2 chance of experiencing at least one recurrence. The more recurrences there are, the more damage there is to the joint and the greater the disability for the patient. The decree determining the medical aptitude of military personnel emphasizes the need to have recourse to a specialized consultation to determine the classification of the soldier after a first episode of dislocation. In the absence of data collected specifically in the military population, classification is based on the surgeon's experience and extrapolation of results obtained in the general population.",[29],"2023-04-27",{"date":283,"type":40},"2023-04-28",{"date":285,"type":21},"2023-09",{"date":287,"type":21},"2029-09",{"name":289,"class":46},"Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées",2]