[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"shoulder-frozen\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:shoulder-frozen":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,49],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":48},"100230929","phase-4-adhesive-capsulitis-prospective-analysis-of-efficacy-and-financial-impact-for-use-of-physical-therapy-in-treatment-100230929",false,"NCT02283996","Adhesive Capsulitis: Prospective Analysis of Efficacy and Financial Impact for Use of Physical Therapy in Treatment","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient must be 18 years or older\n* Must meet the following definition for adhesive capsulitis as defined by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Self-limiting condition resulting from any inflammatory process about the shoulder in which capsular scar tissue is produced, resulting in pain and limited range of motion; also called frozen shoulder\n* Must be amenable to randomization into either cohort\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Non-English speaking patients\n* Pregnant women (women of childbearing potential will be advised to undergo regular pregnancy testing)\n* Patients who had previously undergone operative therapy for the condition",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},260,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"PHASE4","The purpose of this study is to identify individuals 18 or older who have diagnostic presentation of adhesive capsulitis and randomize them into two arms, distinguished by use of physical therapy and steroid injections compared with steroid injections followed by watchful waiting. This prospective study will be used to determine whether there is a significant impact on patient outcome and whether the additional financial burden is justified. There are no experimental interventions for this study. The use of physical therapy, oral and parenteral corticosteroids, and watchful waiting are offered following the standard of care for adhesive capsulitis. Our hypothesis is that patients will not have a significant difference in outcome between the two study arms. One group will undergo regular physical therapy with corticosteroid injections (Arm 1) and the other will have steroid injections during the inflammatory phase only and then be regularly observed (Arm 2). We also hypothesize there will be a significant financial burden associated with the PT arm that is not justified with the possibility of increased symptom reports in that arm.",[26,27,28],"Adhesive Capsulitis","Frozen Shoulder","Shoulder Frozen",[26,27,28,30,31,32,33,34,35],"Physical Therapy","Corticosteroid Injections","Hydrodilation, Hydro-dilation","Watchful Waiting","Prospective","Glenohumeral Ligament","RECRUITING","2025-10-24",{"date":39,"type":40},"2025-10-27","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":40},"2014-11",{"date":44,"type":20},"2027-12",{"name":46,"class":47},"Massachusetts General Hospital","OTHER",1,{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":56,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":60,"briefSummary":62,"conditions":63,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":48},"100574776","compare-the-effect-of-spencer-technique-with-and-without-ac-mobilization-for-fs-pathients-100574776","NCT06763679","Compare the Effect of Spencer Technique With and Without AC Mobilization for FS Pathients","Comparative Effects of Spencer Technique With and Without Acromioclavicular Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability Among Patients of Frozen Shoulder","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male and female both are included\n* Age of 50-60 years\n* Unilateral frozen shoulder stage 2 with pain lasting for more than 1 month\n* Capsular pattern of motion restriction (lateral rotation, abduction, medial rotation)\n* More than 50% loss of passive movement of shoulder\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Rotator cuff tear\n* Dislocation of shoulder\n* Shoulder subluxation\n* Upper limb fracture\n* History of shoulder surgery\n* All other co-morbidities are excluded","50 Years","60 Years",{"count":59,"type":20},44,[61],"NA","The propose of the study will help the clinicians provide an evidence-based approach for the application of Spencer technique and acromioclavicular mobilization, an application of these techniques on pain, range of motion and functional disability of patients of frozen shoulder. So, that it can be determined which treatment is superior in terms of achieving better results in the management regime.",[28],[65,66,67,27],"Spencer Technique","Acromioclavicular joint","Mobilization","2025-01-01",{"date":70,"type":40},"2025-01-08",{"date":72,"type":40},"2024-08-05",{"date":74,"type":20},"2025-01-13",{"name":76,"class":47},"Riphah International University"]