[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"shoulder-instability\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:shoulder-instability":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,48,77,106,132,168,195,220,242],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100641606","sling-vs-dynamic-shoulder-stabilizer-after-soft-tissue-shoulder-instability-surgery-slidy-100641606",false,"NCT07644624","Sling vs. Dynamic Shoulder Stabilizer After Soft Tissue Shoulder Instability Surgery (SLIDY)","Sling vs. Dynamic Shoulder Stabilizer After Soft Tissue Shoulder Instability Surgery (\"SLIDY\"): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Feasibility, Early Functional Recovery, and Structural Healing","SLIDY","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization for anterior shoulder instability (Bankart repair ± Hill-Sachs remplissage).\n* Ability and willingness to comply with the study protocol and scheduled follow-ups.\n* Provision of written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Significant glenoid bone loss requiring bony augmentation procedures (e.g., bone block procedures, Latarjet).\n* Concomitant rotator cuff repair or fracture fixation.\n* Contraindication to MRI (e.g., pacemaker, claustrophobia, incompatible implants).\n* Cognitive impairment, language barriers, or logistical inability to attend follow-up visits.\n* Previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This randomized controlled trial seeks to address a significant clinical gap by evaluating the outcomes of two postoperative immobilization methods following arthroscopic soft tissue surgery for anterior shoulder instability: a standard static arm sling and a dynamic shoulder orthosis.",[27,28,29],"Anterior Shoulder Instability","Shoulder Instability","Shoulder Dislocation",[31,32,33,34,35],"Arthroscopic Bankart Repair","Hill-Sachs Remplissage","Dynamic Shoulder Orthosis","Postoperative Immobilization","Shoulder Rehabilitation","RECRUITING","2026-06-15",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-06-17","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":40},{"date":43,"type":21},"2028-06-15",{"name":45,"class":46},"Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":58,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":63,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":4},"100642937","neurocognitive-loading-following-anterior-shoulder-stabilization-a-randomized-controlled-trial-100642937","NCT07631819","Neurocognitive Loading Following Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Effects of Neurocognitive Loading on Neuromuscular Control, Kinesiophobia, and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: Participant must be between 18 and 45 years of age.\n* Diagnosis: Must have undergone arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization surgery (e.g., Bankart repair, Latarjet, or remplissage techniques) within the past month due to traumatic, unilateral anterior shoulder instability.\n* Postoperative Timeline: Currently within postoperative days 10 to 28.\n* Baseline Activity Level: Pre-injury physical activity level must be a score of 3 or higher on the Tegner Activity Scale.\n* Consent: Participant must be willing and give voluntary informed consent to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Hypermobility: Diagnosed generalized joint hypermobility syndrome, defined as a Beighton Score of 5 or higher.\n* Neurological or Systemic Conditions: Presence of any systemic, rheumatic, or neurological disorders.\n* Previous Surgical History: History of prior shoulder surgery or revision surgery on the affected side, with the exception of the primary anterior shoulder stabilization and an accompanying SLAP lesion repair.\n* Concomitant Structural Pathology: Concomitant rotator cuff tear larger than 1 centimeter. History of osteochondral lesions or acromioclavicular separation injuries.\n* Contralateral Limb Status: History of shoulder instability, shoulder surgery, or any shoulder injury within the past 6 months on the uninjured (contralateral) side.\n* Cognitive Impairment: A score of 24 or below on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).\n* Visual\u002FSensory Impairments: Any severe visual or sensory deficit that prevents interaction with visual-reactive training equipment.\n* Pregnancy: Current pregnancy.\n\nNon-compliance\u002FWithdrawal:\n\n* Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent at any stage of the study.\n* Attendance of less than 80% of the scheduled supervised rehabilitation sessions.\n* Missing two consecutive clinical follow-up assessment sessions.","45 Years",{"count":57,"type":21},32,[24],"The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn if adding neurocognitive loading to standard shoulder rehabilitation improves physical and psychological recovery in adults who have undergone arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization surgery (such as Bankart repair, Latarjet, or remplissage procedures).\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes adding neurocognitive loading exercises improve shoulder proprioception, muscle strength, and functional performance compared to standard therapy alone? Does this integrated training approach reduce the kinesiophobia? Does it lead to better overall clinical outcomes and improve psychological readiness to return to sports? Researchers will compare a group receiving standard shoulder exercises combined with dual-task neurocognitive loading (using light-based reaction systems and cognitive tasks) to a control group receiving standard shoulder rehabilitation alone. Participants will:Undergo supervised physical therapy sessions starting 10 days after surgery up to the 16th postoperative week (twice a week for the first 12 weeks, and once a week for weeks 13-16) alongside an assigned home exercise program. Complete neurocognitive loading tasks (if assigned to the intervention group) that challenge attention, quick decision-making, and visual reactions while executing physical movements. Attend detailed clinical evaluation sessions lasting about 60 minutes before the treatment starts, and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. These assessments include neurocognitive, functional and clinical tests, and questionnaires.",[28,61,62],"Joint Instability","Postoperative Care",[64,65,66],"proprioception","dual task training","neurocognitive training","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-02",{"date":70,"type":40},"2026-06-08",{"date":72,"type":21},"2026-07-01",{"date":74,"type":21},"2029-07-01",{"name":76,"class":46},"Hacettepe University",{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":83,"enrollmentInfo":84,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":86,"briefSummary":87,"conditions":88,"keywords":89,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":97,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":98,"startDateStruct":100,"completionDateStruct":102,"leadSponsor":104,"locationsCount":4},"100623766","effectiveness-of-a-standardised-stabilisation-exercise-protocol-in-volleyball-players-with-non-traumatic-shoulder-instability-100623766","NCT07400900","Effectiveness of a Standardised Stabilisation Exercise Protocol in Volleyball Players With Non-traumatic Shoulder Instability","Inclusion criteria:\n\n* Amateur volleyball players.\n* Age range: 18 to 30 years.\n* Clinical diagnosis of atraumatic shoulder instability.\n* Symptom duration greater than 3 months.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* Previous surgeries on the affected shoulder.\n* Previous fractures of the affected shoulder.\n* History of traumatic shoulder dislocation.\n* Shoulder pain originating from cervical spine pathology.\n* Presence of pain in the elbow, wrist, or hand.\n* Clinical diagnosis of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain or frozen shoulder.\n* Medical diagnosis of cardiovascular, rheumatologic, or neurological disorders.\n* Pregnancy.\n* Cognitive impairment.\n* Concurrent physiotherapy treatment during the study period.\n* Use of analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication within 24 hours prior to study assessments.","30 Years",{"count":85,"type":21},22,[24],"This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized shoulder stabilization exercise program in amateur volleyball players diagnosed with atraumatic shoulder instability. Shoulder pain is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal complaints, affecting up to two-thirds of the general population at some point in life and frequently leading to long-term symptoms, functional limitations, sleep disturbances, and high socio-economic costs. Atraumatic glenohumeral instability is particularly common among athletes performing overhead movements, such as volleyball players, who are repeatedly exposed to high-velocity external and internal rotation actions during serves and spikes.\n\nThe Derby Shoulder Instability Rehabilitation Programme (DSIRP) is a structured, reproducible protocol integrating strengthening, proprioceptive, neuromuscular control, plyometric, and speed-oriented exercises. Although widely used in clinical practice, evidence supporting its superiority over the natural progression of the condition remains limited. More than 80% of physiotherapists in the United Kingdom do not use specific standardized protocols for atraumatic shoulder instability, highlighting the need for high-quality clinical trials that evaluate structured rehabilitation approaches.\n\nThis study will recruit amateur volleyball players aged 20 to 30 years with a clinical diagnosis of atraumatic shoulder instability lasting more than 3 months. Participants will be randomized (1:1) into two parallel groups: an experimental group performing the DSIRP for 8 weeks (three 25-minute sessions per week), and a control group following a \"wait-and-see\" approach. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months (post-intervention). The primary outcomes include pain intensity measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and shoulder disability measured with the Spanish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Secondary outcomes include external rotation strength, grip strength, shoulder range of motion, and health-related quality of life assessed with the SF-12 questionnaire. All measurements use validated instruments with high reliability for clinical and research settings.\n\nStatistical analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA or non-parametric alternatives when appropriate. Effect sizes and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons will be applied. An independent biostatistician blinded to allocation will conduct the analysis. The study follows CONSORT and TIDieR guidelines for reporting and intervention description.\n\nThis trial seeks to determine whether a structured, progressive stabilization protocol offers clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, strength, mobility, and quality of life compared with no intervention in young volleyball players with atraumatic shoulder instability. Results may support the implementation of standardized rehabilitation strategies in physiotherapy practice for this condition.",[28],[90,91,92,93,94,95,96],"voleyball","shoulder pain","instability","exercise","Derby Shoulder Instability Rehabilitation Programme","randomized controlled trial","overhead","2026-04-28",{"date":99,"type":40},"2026-05-04",{"date":101,"type":21},"2026-05-01",{"date":103,"type":21},"2026-08-01",{"name":105,"class":46},"Universidad Francisco de Vitoria",{"id":107,"slug":108,"hasResults":11,"nctId":109,"briefTitle":110,"officialTitle":111,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":112,"healthyVolunteers":113,"sex":17,"minAge":114,"maxAge":115,"enrollmentInfo":116,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":118,"briefSummary":119,"conditions":120,"keywords":121,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":97,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":124,"startDateStruct":125,"completionDateStruct":127,"leadSponsor":129,"locationsCount":131},"100482627","surgical-treatment-of-recurrent-shoulder-dislocations-100482627","NCT05564494","Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Shoulder Dislocations","The Arthroscopic Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability (ATRASI): A Pilot Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Recurrent anterior glenohumeral dislocation (two or more incidents)\n* Presence of glenoid and\u002For humerus bone loss on imaging (x Ray, CT or MRI)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Uncontrolled diabetes (Hgb A1C \\>7%)\n* Prior surgery of affected shoulder\n* Pregnancy\n* Multidirectional instability\n* Posterior instability\n* Paralysis of the shoulder\n* Cancer\n* Severe systemic illness\n* Presence of massive rotator cuff tear\n* Patients that present with \\\u003C 10% or \\> 25% bone loss under preoperative imaging.\n* Generalized laxity (\\>5\u002F9 Beighton Score)",true,"16 Years","40 Years",{"count":117,"type":21},200,[24],"This is a pilot multi-centre, double blinded randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome of this pilot trial will be feasibility. Prior to conducting a large definitive trial, the investigators will conduct this pilot trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR), evaluating recurrent dislocation rates and functional outcomes over a 24-month period. The feasibility objectives are: (1) to evaluate the investigators ability to recruit patients across multiple sites and (2) to assess study protocol adherence and ability to follow patients to 24 months. Clinical objectives for the pilot trial are exploratory only. The investigators wish to gather means and standard deviations for clinical outcomes to power their future definitive trial. The objectives of the definitive trial will include a comparison of patient-reported outcomes at the two-year post-operative time point, differences in recurrence rates, complication rates, functional shoulder assessments, and return to work\u002Fsport.",[28],[122,28,123],"Arthroscopy","Multiple Dislocations",{"date":99,"type":40},{"date":126,"type":40},"2023-04-25",{"date":128,"type":21},"2028-12-31",{"name":130,"class":46},"Nova Scotia Health Authority",2,{"id":133,"slug":134,"hasResults":11,"nctId":135,"briefTitle":136,"officialTitle":137,"acronym":138,"eligibilityCriteria":139,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":114,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":140,"targetDuration":142,"studyType":143,"phases":4,"briefSummary":144,"conditions":145,"keywords":151,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":159,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":160,"startDateStruct":162,"completionDateStruct":164,"leadSponsor":166,"locationsCount":47},"100630343","shoulder-dislocation-assessment-of-lesions-trajectories-and-outcomes-salto-100630343","NCT07486440","Shoulder Dislocation: Assessment of Lesions, Trajectories and Outcomes (SALTO)","SALTO: Shoulder Dislocation: Assessment of Lesions, Trajectories and Outcomes. A Prospective Cohort of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations","SALTO","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* Age ≥16 years\n* Diagnosis of first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation\n* Resident in the Oslo region who presents to Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic for treatment or follow-up within two weeks after initial injury\n* Ability to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\n* Previous shoulder dislocation requiring reduction (Patients uncertain about prior dislocation are excluded)\n* Age \\\u003C 16 years\n* Chronic substance abuse affecting compliance\n* Inability to understand Norwegian or English\n* Adult not able to provide consent or severe medical or psychiatric condition precluding follow-up",{"count":141,"type":21},180,"10 Years","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide epidemiological and prognostic data from a defined urban population and to improve understanding of risk factors and long-term outcomes following first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in patients aged 16 years and older presenting to the Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic.\n\nThe main questions the study aims to answer are:\n\n* What is the incidence of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations in the Oslo region?\n* What is the prevalence and extent of bipolar bone loss and soft tissue injuries measured by CT and MR after a first-time shoulder dislocation?\n* Does bone loss increase the risk of recurrent shoulder instability?\n* How do imaging findings and recurrence influence long-term shoulder function and quality of life?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Undergo standard clinical evaluation and conventional radiographs as part of routine care and asked to participate and followed longitudinally\n* Be offered additional CT and MRI imaging to assess glenoid and humeral bone loss and to evaluate soft tissue injuries.\n* Complete electronic questionnaires (WOSI, EQ-5D-5L, pain score, Rowe score, return to sport\u002Fwork) at 3 months, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years.\n* Be invited to long-term follow-up, including radiographs at 10 years to evaluate signs of osteoarthritis.",[146,147,148,28,149,150],"Anterior Shoulder Dislocation","Shoulder Dislocation Closed Traumatic","First Time Shoulder Dislocation","Hill Sach Lesion","Bankart Lesion",[152,153,154,155,156,157,158],"First time shoulder dislocation","Shoulder instability","Primary shoulder dislocation","Recurrence","Bone loss","traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation","prospective","2026-03-18",{"date":161,"type":40},"2026-03-20",{"date":163,"type":21},"2026-04-15",{"date":165,"type":21},"2037-04",{"name":167,"class":46},"Oslo University Hospital",{"id":169,"slug":170,"hasResults":11,"nctId":171,"briefTitle":172,"officialTitle":173,"acronym":174,"eligibilityCriteria":175,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":176,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":177,"targetDuration":179,"studyType":143,"phases":4,"briefSummary":180,"conditions":181,"keywords":183,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":186,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":187,"startDateStruct":189,"completionDateStruct":191,"leadSponsor":193,"locationsCount":47},"100624145","french-shoulder-instability-surgery-cohort-study-100624145","NCT07405827","French Shoulder Instability Surgery Cohort Study","Prospective Follow-up Study of Patients Undergoing Shoulder Instability Surgery","ShoulderCDS","Inclusion Criteria\n\nPatients undergoing surgical treatment for shoulder instability, including:\n\nBankart repair (anterior or posterior) Latarjet (Butée) procedure\n\nExclusion Criteria Patient refusal","7 Years",{"count":178,"type":21},5000,"20 Years","This 20-year cohort study follows patients after shoulder instability surgery to evaluate recurrence rates, long-term functional outcomes, return-to-sport rates, and complications.\n\nThe goal is to provide insights into the durability and effectiveness of surgical treatment in order to improve patient care.",[182,28],"Shoulder Instability Subluxation Bilateral",[184,92,185],"shoulder","bankart","2026-02-05",{"date":188,"type":40},"2026-02-12",{"date":190,"type":40},"2022-05-01",{"date":192,"type":21},"2062-04-30",{"name":194,"class":46},"Chirurgie Du Sport",{"id":196,"slug":197,"hasResults":11,"nctId":198,"briefTitle":199,"officialTitle":199,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":200,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":114,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":201,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":203,"briefSummary":204,"conditions":205,"keywords":208,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":186,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":212,"startDateStruct":214,"completionDateStruct":216,"leadSponsor":218,"locationsCount":47},"100622946","virtual-reality-intervention-in-patients-with-persistent-shoulder-pain-100622946","NCT07390227","Virtual Reality Intervention in Patients With Persistent Shoulder Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* General inclusion criteria:\n\n  * Unilateral shoulder pain NPRS ≥ 4\u002F10, persisting longer than 3 months\n  * Adults ≥ 16 years old\n  * Willing and able to comply with study protocol\n  * Diagnosis of rotator cuff related shoulder pain, or shoulder instability, or frozen shoulder, confirmed according to international clinical guidelines\n\n    1\\. RC related shoulder pain\n  * shoulder pain and\u002For weakness during active or resisted shoulder external rotation, and or, shoulder elevation and\u002For\n  * Presence of Painful arc during elevation\n\n    2\\. shoulder instability\n  * Radiographically, computed tomography scans, magnetic resonance imaging scans confirmed dislocation or\n  * Documented history of manual or surgical relocation of the shoulder\n  * Traumatic onset with persistent symptoms\n  * Positive apprehension sign (fear of imminent dislocation when the arm is placed in abduction and external rotation during clinical examination)\n\n    3\\. frozen shoulder\n  * Restricted active and passive range of shoulder movement in all directions\n  * Restricted active and passive shoulder external rotation of 50 percent compared to non-painful arm\n  * Nothing abnormal detected on radiograph of shoulder\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Neurological disease affecting the shoulder\n* Shoulder stiffness not consistent to frozen shoulder\n* Pain in the shoulder that is elicited by movements of the head and neck.\n* history of motion-sickness\n* history of seizures\n* severe vertigo or vestibular impairment.",{"count":202,"type":21},30,[24],"Shoulder pain is very common and can make daily activities difficult. Many people have shoulder pain for a long time, even after treatment. Common shoulder problems include pain from the shoulder muscles and tendons, a frozen shoulder, or an unstable shoulder. Unfortunately, both surgery and physiotherapy often help only a little. This can be due to many reasons, such as people not continuing their exercises, fear of moving the shoulder, incorrect beliefs about pain, other health problems, or lifestyle factors.\n\nVirtual Reality (VR) is a new and promising technology that is already being used to help people with long-lasting pain. By using a VR headset, people can exercise in a motivating and engaging virtual environment. VR may help reduce fear of movement, improve how people feel about their body, make movement easier, and help people stick to their exercises. However, there is still very little research on using VR for long-lasting shoulder pain.\n\nThe goal of this study is to find out whether a home-based VR exercise program for people with ongoing shoulder complaints is practical and acceptable. The investigators want to know if people are willing and able to use VR at home, whether they continue the treatment, and whether it shows early signs of reducing pain and limitations. They also want to understand who benefits most from VR, in which situations it works best, and why it may or may not help.\n\nPeople aged 16 years and older who have had shoulder pain and limitations for more than three months can take part. This includes people with shoulder tendon-related pain, frozen shoulder, or shoulder instability.\n\nThe study lasts six weeks and includes three parts. First, participants receive online educational videos about shoulder pain and movement. Second, they take part in three physiotherapy sessions: one in person and two online. Third, participants use a VR headset at home every day for about 15 minutes to perform guided shoulder and whole-body exercises, such as reaching or aiming tasks. The exercises gradually become more challenging. Participants receive clear written and video instructions, and technical support is available if needed.\n\nDuring the study, participants will complete questionnaires and the VR system will record basic usage data. At the end of the study, group interviews will be held with participants and physiotherapists to talk about their experiences with VR and how it influenced pain, movement, and daily activities.\n\nUsing VR is considered safe. Some people may experience mild and short-lasting side effects, such as dizziness, but serious problems are not expected. The main effort for participants is the time spent on exercises and completing questionnaires.\n\nThe results of this study will help determine whether VR is a useful and realistic treatment option for people with long-lasting shoulder pain and will guide future, larger studies.",[206,28,207],"Rotator Cuff Syndrome","Frozen Shoulder",[209,210,211],"Virtual reality","Shoulder","persitent shoulder pain",{"date":213,"type":40},"2026-02-09",{"date":215,"type":21},"2026-01-12",{"date":217,"type":21},"2026-12-01",{"name":219,"class":46},"HAN University of Applied Sciences",{"id":221,"slug":222,"hasResults":11,"nctId":223,"briefTitle":224,"officialTitle":225,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":226,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":227,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":229,"briefSummary":230,"conditions":231,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":233,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":234,"startDateStruct":236,"completionDateStruct":238,"leadSponsor":240,"locationsCount":47},"100590174","virtual-reality-rehabilitation-for-shoulder-pathologies-100590174","NCT06963983","Virtual Reality Rehabilitation for Shoulder Pathologies","Personalized Rehabilitation System Using Gamification With Virtual Reality Technology: A Feasibility Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients able to understand the content of the patient information \u002F consent form and give consent to take part in the research project\n* Glenohumeral instability surgical treated with traumatic initial instability in a \\\u003C 20 years old athlete, recurrent instability with one or more of the following criteria: a failure of conservative treatment, locked dislocation, failed prior surgery, high risk for further recurrence (i.e. collision or competitive athletes), Critical glenoid bone-loss (\\>15-20%), bipolar bone-loss resulting in \"off-track\" lesion\n* Partial or complete rotator cuff repair with an indication to postoperative rehabilitation depending on surgeon recommendation\n* Idiopathic, primary, or secondary frozen shoulder\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a language barrier hindering questionnaires completion\n* Patients unlikely to attend clinical follow-up (e.g. when living abroad)\n* Legal incompetence\n* Enrolment of the investigators, his\u002Fher family members, employees and other dependent persons\n* Non-motivated patients\n* Active infection\n* Exclusion criteria related to glenohumeral instability: uncontrolled epilepsy, spontaneous unidirectional instability in a hyperlax patient, multidirectional instability, elher-Danlos syndrome\n* Exclusion criteria related to rotator cuff tears: Additional procedure(s) (muscle transfer, patch,…)\n* Exclusion criteria related to VR use: Patients with a predisposition to motion sickness, Patients suffering from epilepsy or having any serious mental illness (schyzophrenia, neurological problems, etc.), Patients with visual impairment , Patients will intellectual disability that prevent them to understand how to use the VR rehabilitation system, Patients with bilateral upper limb injuries, as one side is needed as healthy reference",{"count":228,"type":21},15,[24],"Most rehabilitation protocols require patients to train the affected limbs with high regularity, following repetitive cycles of exercises, in order to recover mobility and strength. Nonetheless, the repetitive nature of these exercises can demotivate patients leading to less intense and committed training, if not ending with a lack of compliance toward the prescribed exercises, ultimately leading to a suboptimal recovery. For this reason, several research groups are investigating solutions to help patients in this process, using robotic support or protocols assisted by virtual reality (VR).\n\nMost of these studies have shown benefits, notably in the field of post-stroke rehabilitation, however numerous types of physical therapies have not been investigated yet. Therefore, the main goal of this study will be to explore if the combination of modern motion-tracking and VR can provide significant functional outcomes for the treatment of the most common upper limb pathologies. The investigators created a set of exergames designed to lead the patients through a gamified version of part of physiotherapy (PT). This modified therapy is expected to offer several benefits to the treatment with respect to a purely conventional therapy: (i) improved patient's motivation and commitment to the exercises; (ii) constant evaluation of the patient's performance, thanks to the use of motion tracking; (iii) session-by-session tuning of exercises difficulty; (iv) clear progress traceability; (v) real-time alerts in case of problematic or compensatory movements; (vi) measurement and evaluation of new metrics of movements quality that were not possible in conventional therapy setups.\n\nTo evaluate the feasibility of this project, the investigators would like to test the VR system on a short series of patients during four sessions.",[28,207,232],"Rotator Cuff Tears","2025-04-30",{"date":235,"type":40},"2025-05-09",{"date":237,"type":40},"2024-10-28",{"date":239,"type":21},"2025-06-28",{"name":241,"class":46},"La Tour Hospital",{"id":243,"slug":244,"hasResults":11,"nctId":245,"briefTitle":246,"officialTitle":247,"acronym":248,"eligibilityCriteria":249,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":250,"enrollmentInfo":251,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":253,"briefSummary":254,"conditions":255,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":259,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":260,"startDateStruct":262,"completionDateStruct":264,"leadSponsor":266,"locationsCount":4},"100528166","multifactorial-approach-training-for-anterior-shoulder-instability-in-patients-undergoing-arthroscopic-bankart-repair-100528166","NCT06157229","Multifactorial Approach Training for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair","Multifactorial Approach Training for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair, a Randomized Controlled Trial","MATASI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Primary or recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (MRI-confirmed labral tear)\n* Aged between 18-67 years\n* Planned arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) surgery\n* Understanding of spoken and written Dutch language\n* Written informed consent (according to the ICH-GCP guidelines)\n* Positive apprehension sign at physical examination\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Posterior or multidirectional shoulder instability\n* Presence of hyperlaxity of the upper extremity and absence of sulcus sign and \\>85 degrees of external rotation with the arm at the side at physical examination\n* Connective tissue disorders (e.g. Ehlers-Danlos)\n* Aged \\\u003C18 or \\>67 years\n* Assymetry in rotator cuff strength, bilateral component ((sub)luxations on contralateral side)\n* History of soft tissue repair or bone block procedure on one of both shoulders\n* Current or past anxiety disorders or use of anxiety supressing drugs (e.g. anti-psychotics)\n* Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (unable to be included for functional MRI)\n* Neurological disorders or systemic disease\n* Loss of anteroinferior sclerotic contour of the glenoid on AP view of the shoulder\n* Hill-Sachs lesion visible on external rotation radiographs\n* Greater tubercle fracture","67 Years",{"count":252,"type":21},100,[24],"This study will compare functional outcomes after an arthroscopic Bankart repair between patients that underwent conventional arthroscopic Bankart repair rehabilitation, following the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists guideline and patients that underwent 'multifactorial approach training', which focusses on decreasing kinesiophobia and fear of recurrent dislocations.\n\nThe study population comprises patients who will undergo Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) after a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation at Spaarne Gasthuis Haarlem\u002FHoofddorp, OLVG Amsterdam, Amstelland Ziekenhuis Amstelveen, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Medisch Spectrum Twente, or Flevoziekenhuis Almere.",[28,256,257,258],"Shoulder Dislocation or Subluxation","Fear of Movement","Kinesiophobia","2023-11-27",{"date":261,"type":40},"2023-12-05",{"date":263,"type":21},"2024-01-01",{"date":265,"type":21},"2027-06-01",{"name":267,"class":46},"Spaarne Gasthuis"]