[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"shoulder-surgery\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:shoulder-surgery":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,49,80,108,130,161,187,219,246],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":38,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":39,"startDateStruct":42,"completionDateStruct":44,"leadSponsor":46,"locationsCount":4},"100644517","phase-4-comparative-evaluation-of-diaphragmatic-function-following-interscalene-anterior-suprascapular-and-costoclavicular-nerve-blocks-in-shoulder-surgery-100644517",false,"NCT07671352","Comparative Evaluation of Diaphragmatic Function Following Interscalene, Anterior Suprascapular, and Costoclavicular Nerve Blocks in Shoulder Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAdults of both sexes, aged 18 to 70 years American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II Scheduled for elective shoulder surgery\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPulmonary disease or baseline diaphragmatic dysfunction Refusal to provide informed consent Pre-existing neuropathy in the operated limb Allergy to local anesthetics Infection at the injection site Coagulopathy Pregnancy","ALL","18 Years","80 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},75,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"PHASE4","Shoulder surgery causes significant postoperative pain, and ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is central to its management. The interscalene block (ISB) is the gold standard but frequently causes phrenic nerve paralysis and hemi-diaphragmatic paresis, limiting its use in patients with reduced pulmonary reserve. The suprascapular (SSNB) and costoclavicular (CCB) blocks are proposed diaphragm-sparing alternatives, but data directly comparing all three are limited.\n\nThis randomised, double-blinded trial will compare the incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis among ultrasound-guided ISB, SSNB, and CCB in elective shoulder surgery. Seventy-five ASA I-II patients aged 18-70 will be allocated 1:1:1 to one block. The primary outcome is the incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis, measured by ultrasound diaphragmatic excursion before induction and after recovery in the PACU. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction. The investigators hypothesise that SSNB and CCB will cause less hemidiaphragmatic paresis than ISB while providing comparable analgesia.",[26,27,28,29],"Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis","Postoperative Pain","Shoulder Surgery","Brachial Plexus Block",[31,32,33,34,35,36],"Interscalene block","Suprascapular nerve block","Costoclavicular block","Diaphragmatic excursion","Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia","Phrenic nerve palsy","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-22",{"date":40,"type":41},"2026-06-26","ACTUAL",{"date":43,"type":20},"2026-06-25",{"date":45,"type":20},"2027-01-01",{"name":47,"class":48},"Menoufia University","OTHER",{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":54,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":58,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":62,"overallStatus":69,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":70,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":71,"startDateStruct":73,"completionDateStruct":75,"leadSponsor":77,"locationsCount":79},"100585648","eccentric-or-concentric-contralateral-training-in-rehabilitation-after-shoulder-surgery-with-elbow-immobilization-100585648","NCT06905093","Eccentric or Concentric Contralateral Training in Rehabilitation After Shoulder Surgery With Elbow Immobilization","EXC-IMMO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patient (≥ 18 years old) undergoing shoulder surgery (i.e., Bankart procedure, rotator cuff repair, arthroplasty)\n* With an indication for immobilization, expected to last 4 to 6 weeks\n* Free from any neurological pathology\n* Having provided their informed consent before any participation in the research\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Having a medical contraindication to the practice of physical and sports activities\n* Presenting an expected modification of their physical activity of the non-immobilized limb\n* Having suffered an injury to the upper limbs in the last 6 months\n* Having already undergone surgery on the upper limbs\n* Pregnant, parturient, and breastfeeding women\n* Presenting a medically established alteration of their cognitive functions\n* Subject under guardianship, curatorship, family empowerment, or judicial safeguard\n* Not affiliated or beneficiary of health insurance coverage\n* Any other reason that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives",{"count":57,"type":20},42,[59],"NA","This clinical study investigates whether contralateral training (exercising the non-immobilized arm) can help preserve muscle strength and mass in patients recovering from shoulder surgery with elbow immobilization. Immobilization is often necessary to prevent further injury, but it can lead to significant muscle loss and reduced strength, delaying recovery and increasing healthcare costs. Recent studies suggest that training the non-immobilized arm may help maintain muscle function in the immobilized arm, particularly when using eccentric exercises (where muscles lengthen under tension). This study aims to compare the effects of eccentric and concentric (shortening) contralateral training versus standard care (no training) in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.\n\nThe study involves 4 visits: pre-surgery assessments, a 4-6 weeks' immobilization period with or without training, and follow-ups at the end of immobilization, 6 weeks' post-immobilization, and 17 weeks' post-immobilization. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group receiving standard care, a group performing eccentric training, or a group performing concentric training. Muscle strength, mass, and function will be measured using tests such as isometric strength, ultrasound imaging, and functional scores.\n\nThe hypothesis is that eccentric contralateral training will better preserve neuromuscular function and muscle mass in the immobilized arm compared to both standard care and concentric training. This could lead to faster recovery and improved outcomes for patients. The study will provide valuable insights into optimizing rehabilitation strategies for patients recovering from shoulder surgery.",[28],[63,64,65,66,67,68],"Cross-education","Contralateral training","Eccentric training","Concentric training","Immobilization","Rehabilitation","RECRUITING","2026-06-15",{"date":72,"type":41},"2026-06-16",{"date":74,"type":41},"2025-12-02",{"date":76,"type":20},"2027-10",{"name":78,"class":48},"Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer",1,{"id":81,"slug":82,"hasResults":11,"nctId":83,"briefTitle":84,"officialTitle":85,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":86,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":87,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":89,"briefSummary":90,"conditions":91,"keywords":94,"overallStatus":69,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":99,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":100,"startDateStruct":102,"completionDateStruct":104,"leadSponsor":106,"locationsCount":79},"100618999","dose-finding-study-mev90-for-local-anesthetic-in-interscalene-block-for-supraclavicular-nerves-block-100618999","NCT07338916","Dose-Finding Study: MEV90 for Local Anesthetic in Interscalene Block for Supraclavicular Nerves Block","Minimum Effective Volume (MEV90) of Local Anesthetic Required for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block for Supraclavicular Nerve Block: A Dose-Finding Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* ASA physical status I to III\n* Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kg\u002Fm²\n* Weight ≥ 50 kg\n* Scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy requiring an interscalene brachial plexus block for analgesia\n* Able to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inability to provide informed consent\n* Coagulopathy (platelet count ≤100,000; INR ≥1.4)\n* Significant pulmonary disease (restrictive or obstructive)\n* Renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥1.2 mg\u002FdL)\n* Hepatic insufficiency (transaminases ≥100 U\u002FL)\n* Allergy to local anesthetics\n* Pregnancy\n* Pre-existing neuropathy\n* Previous surgery in ipsilateral cervical or supraclavicular region\n* Contralateral hemidiaphragmatic paralysis or vocal cord paralysis",{"count":88,"type":20},55,[59],"This study aims to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV90) of local anesthetic required to achieve sensory block of the supraclavicular nerves when performing a single-shot ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB). These nerves provide sensation to the skin over the clavicle and shoulder and are often involved in surgeries such as shoulder arthroscopy and clavicle repair.",[92,28,93],"Brachial Plexus Blockade","Superficial Cervical Plexus Block",[95,92,96,28,97,98],"Interscalene Block","Supraclavicular nerves block","Miminum Effective Volume 90","MEV90","2026-04-06",{"date":101,"type":41},"2026-04-08",{"date":103,"type":20},"2026-04",{"date":105,"type":20},"2026-12",{"name":107,"class":48},"Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago",{"id":109,"slug":110,"hasResults":11,"nctId":111,"briefTitle":112,"officialTitle":113,"acronym":114,"eligibilityCriteria":115,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":116,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":118,"briefSummary":119,"conditions":120,"keywords":121,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":123,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":124,"startDateStruct":125,"completionDateStruct":126,"leadSponsor":128,"locationsCount":79},"100631552","percutaneous-peripheral-nerve-stimulation-ppns-for-post-surgical-pain-after-shoulder-surgery-100631552","NCT07502170","Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PPNS) for Post-Surgical Pain After Shoulder Surgery","Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PPNS), for Post-surgical Pain After Shoulder Surgery: a Prospective Comparative Randomized Study","STIM-SHOULDER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged over 18 years old\n* Patients scheduled for shoulder surgery under regional and general anesthesia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Outpatient surgery\n* Patients scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)\n* Patients with an implanted pacemaker\n* Patients receiving chronic opioid therapy\n* Opioid mesusage\n* Contraindication to general anesthesia\n* Contraindication to regional anesthesia\n* Contraindication to analgesics (morphine sulfate, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen)\n* Any contraindication listed in the instructions for use of the investigational medical device\n* Inability to complete a self-assessment questionnaire\n* Inability to ensure follow-up for 72 hours postoperatively\n* Lack of written informed consent",{"count":117,"type":20},60,[59],"Despite the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols incorporating multimodal analgesia and regional anesthesia, postoperative pain following shoulder surgery remains inadequately controlled. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PPNS) represents a potential alternative strategy for postoperative pain management. This prospective randomized study aims to assess the efficacy of PPNS for postoperative pain control following shoulder surgery.",[28],[122],"neurostimulation","2026-03-30",{"date":99,"type":41},{"date":103,"type":20},{"date":127,"type":20},"2028-09",{"name":129,"class":48},"University Hospital, Montpellier",{"id":131,"slug":132,"hasResults":11,"nctId":133,"briefTitle":134,"officialTitle":135,"acronym":136,"eligibilityCriteria":137,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":138,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":140,"briefSummary":141,"conditions":142,"keywords":146,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":153,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":154,"startDateStruct":155,"completionDateStruct":157,"leadSponsor":159,"locationsCount":79},"100631498","ventilation-safety-in-beach-chair-shoulder-surgery-safelm-versus-i-gel-100631498","NCT07501468","Ventilation Safety in Beach Chair Shoulder Surgery: SafeLM Versus I-gel","Comparison of SafeLM™ Video Laryngeal Mask and I-gel® for Ventilation Safety After Transition to Beach Chair Position in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study","SAFE-BCP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-80 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III\n* Scheduled for elective shoulder surgery\n* Body mass index (BMI) between 18-40 kg\u002Fm\\^2\n* Adequate preoperative fasting (approximately 8 hours)\n* Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age \\\u003C18 or \\>80 years\n* Refusal to participate\n* ASA physical status \\>= IV\n* BMI \\>40 kg\u002Fm\\^2\n* Failure of supraglottic airway device placement after three attempts\n* Revision surgery\n* Multiple trauma\n* Maxillofacial fracture\n* Active malignancy receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy\n* Active infection or ongoing antibiotic therapy (except prophylaxis)\n* Chronic steroid or immunosuppressive therapy\n* Full stomach\n* Gastroesophageal reflux disease\n* History of gastric surgery\n* Gastroparesis\n* Known egg allergy",{"count":139,"type":20},70,[59],"This study aims to compare the performance of SafeLM™ video laryngeal mask airway and i-gel® supraglottic airway device in patients undergoing shoulder surgery in the beach chair position under general anesthesia. The primary objective is to evaluate oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) within the first 10 minutes after transition to the beach chair position. Secondary objectives include assessment of ventilation safety, need for airway interventions, and postoperative airway-related complications. This prospective randomized study will provide data on the effectiveness and safety of a video-guided supraglottic airway device compared to a conventional device in a clinically challenging position.",[143,28,144,145],"Airway Management","General Anesthetic","Supraglottic Airway",[147,148,149,150,151,152],"Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure","SafeLM","i-gel","Ventilation Safety","Beach Chair Position","Video Laryngeal Mask Airway","2026-03-26",{"date":123,"type":41},{"date":156,"type":20},"2026-04-15",{"date":158,"type":20},"2026-09-15",{"name":160,"class":48},"Ankara City Hospital Bilkent",{"id":162,"slug":163,"hasResults":11,"nctId":164,"briefTitle":165,"officialTitle":166,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":167,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":168,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":170,"briefSummary":171,"conditions":172,"keywords":174,"overallStatus":69,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":178,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":179,"startDateStruct":181,"completionDateStruct":183,"leadSponsor":185,"locationsCount":79},"100609610","interscalene-vs-phrenic-sparing-blocks-in-obesity-and-effect-of-maximum-inspiratory-pressure-100609610","NCT07216820","Interscalene vs Phrenic-sparing Blocks in Obesity and Effect of Maximum Inspiratory Pressure","Interscalene vs Phrenic-sparing Blocks in Obesity: Effect of Pre-operative Maximum Inspiratory Pressure in a Randomized Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years (self-report, confirmed on chart).\n* Body-mass index ≥ 35 kg m\\^2 at the pre-operative clinic visit (chart).\n* Scheduled for elective unilateral shoulder surgery (arthroscopy, arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, reverse arthroplasty) under general anesthesia at UNC Hospitals\n* Planned use of a single-injection regional brachial-plexus block for postoperative analgesia (anesthesia record).\n* Able to perform a maximal-inspiratory-pressure (MIP) maneuver at screening, producing two reproducible efforts (bedside test)\n* Able to read or understand English and provide written informed consent (consent discussion).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Emergent or trauma shoulder procedure or case converted to open surgery (schedule\u002Fchart).\n* Pregnancy confirmed by point-of-care urine test on day of surgery (POC test). Prisoner status or legal incapacity to consent (chart\u002Finterview).\n* Severe pulmonary disease: GOLD stage 3-4 COPD, restrictive lung disease unrelated to obesity with FVC \\\u003C 50 % predicted, baseline dyspnea Borg ≥ 3, or home oxygen therapy (pulmonary clinic notes, patient interview).\n* Severe heart disease- Severe valvular heart disease, Congestive Heart Failure NYHA Class III or IV, Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease with Angina\n* Neuromuscular disorders affecting respiratory muscles (e.g., ALS, myasthenia gravis) or known diaphragmatic paralysis (chart).\n* Coagulopathy (platelets \\\u003C 100 × 10\u002F L or INR \\> 1.5) or local infection at block sites (pre-op labs\u002Fassessment).\n* Anemia and hemoglobinopathies: Hgb \\\u003C10 g\u002Fdl, clinically significant hemoglobinopathy.\n* Allergy to bupivacaine, dexamethasone, or ultrasound gel (self-report).\n* Chronic opioid use \\> 100 mg oral-morphine equivalents per day in the three months preceding surgery (medication history, PDMP query).\n* Prior enrolment in this trial or planned participation in another interventional study that might confound outcomes (research registry).\n* Anticipated inability to comply with postoperative assessments (e.g., profound cognitive impairment, expected early transfer to outside facility) as judged by the investigator",{"count":169,"type":20},68,[59],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a phrenic-sparing nerve block can lower early breathing problems after shoulder surgery in adults with obesity, and whether a simple breathing-strength test (maximum inspiratory pressure, MIP) helps identify who is at higher risk. The main questions are:\n\nDoes the phrenic-sparing approach reduce breathlessness or oxygen need in the recovery room (30-60 minutes after arrival)? Do patients have similar pain control and opioid use compared with the standard interscalene block (ISB)? Are there any breathing-related complications or unplanned admissions within 24 hours? Researchers will compare the phrenic-sparing block (infraclavicular + distal suprascapular) to the standard ISB, both commonly used at UNC.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nHave a quick MIP breath test before surgery (and, if age ≥65, a brief thigh muscle ultrasound).\n\nBe randomly assigned to receive either the standard ISB or the phrenic-sparing block (both ultrasound-guided and part of routine care).\n\nReceive usual anesthesia\u002Fsurgery; have a brief recovery check at 30-60 minutes (breathlessness score, oxygen use, oxygen level).\n\nHave pain medicines recorded from anesthesia start to PACU discharge; the team may review the chart up to 24 hours and make a short follow-up call (24-48 hours).",[28,173],"Obesity",[175,176,177],"interscalene block","phrenic-sparing block","brachial plexus block","2026-01-27",{"date":180,"type":41},"2026-01-28",{"date":182,"type":41},"2026-01-21",{"date":184,"type":20},"2027-11-15",{"name":186,"class":48},"University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill",{"id":188,"slug":189,"hasResults":11,"nctId":190,"briefTitle":191,"officialTitle":191,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":192,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":193,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":194,"phases":4,"briefSummary":195,"conditions":196,"keywords":206,"overallStatus":69,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":210,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":211,"startDateStruct":213,"completionDateStruct":215,"leadSponsor":217,"locationsCount":79},"100378588","evaluating-hemidiaphragmatic-paralysis-with-prolonged-neural-blockade-from-an-interscalene-brachial-plexus-block-100378588","NCT04209504","Evaluating Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis With Prolonged Neural Blockade From an Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* English speaking 18-80 year old ASA 1-3 patients\n* Primary shoulder surgery\n* Must live within a 25 mile radius\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA 4 or 5\n* Revision shoulder surgery\n* Diagnosis of chronic pain\n* Daily chronic opioid use (over 3 months of continuous opioid use)\n* Inability to communicate pain scores or need for analgesia\n* Infection at the site of block placement\n* Age under 18 years old or greater than 80 years old\n* Pregnant women (as determined by point-of-care serum bHCG)\n* Intolerance\u002Fallergy to local anesthetics\n* Weight \\\u003C50 kg\n* BMI \\> 40\n* severe pulmonary disease including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and restrictive lung disease\n* Suspected, or known addiction to or abuse of illicit drug(s), prescription medicine(s), or alcohol within the past 2 years.\n* Uncontrolled anxiety, schizophrenia, or other psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with study assessments or compliance.\n* Current or historical evidence of any clinically significant disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the risk of surgery or complicate the subject's postoperative course.",{"count":117,"type":20},"OBSERVATIONAL","This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in patients receiving interscalene brachial plexus nerve block with prolonged neural blockade. English speaking American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3 patients ages 18-80 receiving prolonged interscalene nerve block will be randomized into 3 groups: first group receiving a perineural catheter infusing 0.2% ropivacaine; the second group receiving a single shot injection of 10mL liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel; n=20) plus 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and the third receiving 20mL liposomal bupivacaine plus 5mL bupivacaine (to be determined by the attending anesthesiologist).Primary outcome will be incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis postoperative day 1 as measured by point of care (POCUS) ultrasound.",[28,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205],"Shoulder Pain","Shoulder Injuries","Shoulder Arthritis","Shoulder Disease","Rotator Cuff Tears","Rotator Cuff Injuries","Rotator Cuff Arthropathy of Left Shoulder","Rotator Cuff Arthropathy of Right Shoulder","Rotator Cuff Repair",[205,28,207,95,208,209],"Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis","Interscalene Catheter","Interscalene Liposomal Bupivacaine","2025-09-29",{"date":212,"type":41},"2025-10-01",{"date":214,"type":41},"2021-10-12",{"date":216,"type":20},"2026-08-31",{"name":218,"class":48},"Duke University",{"id":220,"slug":221,"hasResults":11,"nctId":222,"briefTitle":223,"officialTitle":224,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":225,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":226,"enrollmentInfo":227,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":228,"briefSummary":229,"conditions":230,"keywords":233,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":237,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":238,"startDateStruct":240,"completionDateStruct":242,"leadSponsor":244,"locationsCount":4},"100567927","suprascapular-and-axillary-versus-interscalene-blocks-regarding-phrenic-affection-in-shoulder-surgeries-100567927","NCT06674551","Suprascapular and Axillary Versus Interscalene Blocks Regarding Phrenic Affection in Shoulder Surgeries","Comparative Study Between Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Blocks Versus Interscalene Nerve Block Regarding Phrenic Nerve Affection Assessed by Ultrasound Guided Diaphragmatic Excursion in Shoulder Arthroscopy Surgeries","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 18 - 60 years old.\n* Both sexes.\n* ASA physical status classes I - II.\n* Body mass index: 18-35 kg\u002F m2.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Infection at site of injection.\n* Psychiatric illness.\n* Central Nervous System Diseases like (epilepsy, stroke …etc.) or neurological disease affecting patient's upper limb.\n* Dependence on opiates and psycho-dynamic medications.\n* Moderate to severe pulmonary disease.\n* Coagulopathy and bleeding disorders.\n* Allergies to drug used (Bupivacaine 0.5%).\n* Previous surgery at site of injection and history of radiotherapy.","60 Years",{"count":117,"type":20},[59],"This study is aims to compare between combined suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks versus interscalene nerve block regarding phrenic nerve affection assessed by ultrasound guided diaphragmatic excursion in shoulder arthroscopy surgeries.",[231,232,28],"Interscalene Nerve Block","Suprascapular Nerve",[234,235,236],"interscalene nerve block","axillary nerve block","shoulder surgery","2024-11-04",{"date":239,"type":41},"2024-11-05",{"date":241,"type":20},"2024-11-20",{"date":243,"type":20},"2025-11-01",{"name":245,"class":48},"Ain Shams University",{"id":247,"slug":248,"hasResults":11,"nctId":249,"briefTitle":250,"officialTitle":250,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":251,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":252,"enrollmentInfo":253,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":194,"phases":4,"briefSummary":255,"conditions":256,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":257,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":258,"startDateStruct":260,"completionDateStruct":262,"leadSponsor":264,"locationsCount":79},"100558590","turkish-validity-and-reliability-study-of-hospital-for-special-surgery-shoulder-surgery-expectations-survey-100558590","NCT06553092","Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Underwent Shoulder Surgery\n* Native Turkish Speakers\n* Adults (18 years and older)\n* Consent to Participate\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n\\-","90 Years",{"count":254,"type":20},100,"This study aims to evaluate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Hospital for Special Surgery Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey. By translating the original survey into Turkish and administering it to a sample of patients who have undergone shoulder surgery, the research seeks to determine whether the survey maintains its accuracy and consistency in the Turkish context. The study will involve statistical analyses to assess the survey's reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity, ensuring that the tool is culturally appropriate and effective for Turkish-speaking patients.",[28],"2024-09-16",{"date":259,"type":41},"2024-09-19",{"date":261,"type":20},"2024-10-01",{"date":263,"type":20},"2025-03-30",{"name":265,"class":48},"Gazi University"]