[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"speech-therapy\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:speech-therapy":34},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,58,90,122],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":36,"overallStatus":46,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":47,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":48,"startDateStruct":51,"completionDateStruct":53,"leadSponsor":55,"locationsCount":5},"100587890","phorte-therapy-efficacy-in-person-versus-telehealth-100587890",false,"NCT06934265","PhoRTE® Therapy Efficacy: In-Person Versus Telehealth","Phonation Resistance Training Exercises (PhoRTE®) Delivered In-person and Via Telehealth: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults 55+ with a primary diagnosis of presbyphonia, age-related voice changes, and\u002For vocal fold atrophy with or without localized loss of lamina propria (e.g. vocal fold scar)\n* Telehealth-capable device (e.g., tablet, computer) with microphone, speaker, camera, high-speed internet\n* Ability to attend four telehealth or in-person sessions for four consecutive sessions\n* Ability to attend two in-person evaluation sessions (pre- and post-treatment)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of localized masses, lesions, or vocal fold motion impairments identified during videostroboscopy at initial evaluation\n* Progressive neurologic conditions, e.g. Parkinson's disease (PD), Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), etc.\n* Previous attendance to exuberant voice therapy (e.g., PhoRTE, Lee Silverman Voice Treatment)\n* Untreated hearing loss\n* Non-English speakers","ALL","54 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},30,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","This study compares how well voice therapy works when delivered in-person versus through telehealth for older adults with age-related voice problems. Researchers are testing whether Phonation Resistance Training Exercises (PhoRTE®) can be just as effective when delivered remotely as when done face-to-face, which could make treatment more accessible and affordable for seniors.\n\nThe two primary hypotheses are:\n\n1. Does voice therapy (called PhoRTE®) work as well through video calls as it does face-to-face?\n2. Can online therapy be a more accessible way for older adults to get help for their voice problems?\n\nAdults aged 55 or older with voice changes and an applicable diagnosis will be randomly assigned to receive either in-person or telehealth therapy, consisting of four 45-minute sessions. After treatment, researchers will measure improvements through:\n\n* Changes in voice function\n* Patient reports about their voice\n* Scientific measurements of voice quality\n* Patient satisfaction with treatment\n* Impact on quality of life\n\nThe results will help determine if telehealth can be a good alternative to in-person voice therapy, especially important as telehealth coverage may be changing.",[26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"Atrophy of Vocal Cord","Presbyphonia","Dysphonia","Glottic Insufficiency","Voice Change","Voice Disorder","Adults","Aging","Speech Therapy","Voice Alteration",[37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45],"Vocal fold atrophy","voice therapy","presbyphonia","aging voice","voice rehabilitation","speech pathology","Intervention","voice","aging","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-01-09",{"date":49,"type":50},"2026-01-13","ACTUAL",{"date":52,"type":20},"2026-01-25",{"date":54,"type":20},"2026-10-25",{"name":56,"class":57},"University of Southern California","OTHER",{"id":59,"slug":60,"hasResults":11,"nctId":61,"briefTitle":62,"officialTitle":63,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":64,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":65,"maxAge":66,"enrollmentInfo":67,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":69,"briefSummary":70,"conditions":71,"keywords":75,"overallStatus":79,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":80,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":81,"startDateStruct":83,"completionDateStruct":85,"leadSponsor":87,"locationsCount":89},"100545423","effect-and-cost-utility-of-of-high-intensity-vs-low-intensity-speech-intervention-in-children-with-cleft-palate-100545423","NCT06381713","Effect and Cost-utility of of High Intensity vs. Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With Cleft Palate","Short and Long Term Effect and Cost-utility of High Intensity vs. Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With Cleft Palate","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip\n* Aged between 4 and 12 years,\n* Presence of at least one compensatory speech error in their speech based on the perceptual assessment of one experienced speech-language pathologist\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with syndromic clefts\n* Oronasal fistula\n* Velopharyngeal insufficiency\n* Hearing disabilities based on pure tone audiometry (\\>25 dB HL)\n* Cognitive and\u002For related learning disabilities or neuromuscular disorders","4 Years","12 Years",{"count":68,"type":20},70,[23],"Achieving speech that is understandable and acceptable to others is the key outcome in cleft treatment. Therefore, speech therapy provided by a speech-language pathologist is necessary. This intervention is traditionally provided twice per week for 30 minutes for months or even years by first-line speech-language pathologists. Unfortunately, this low intensity intervention is based on a historical context rather than scientific evidence. This means that current speech therapy knows several shortcomings including poor outcomes, treatment fatigue and high costs related to year-long therapy. Because of these issues, the use of high intensity speech intervention is proposed. Even though solid proof-of-concepts exist for this model, it has not yet found its way into clinical practice.\n\nBefore this intensity can be implemented and utilized in clinical practice, the effect of this novel program on a larger societal scale must be determined. This project will compare the effect of high intensity and low intensity speech intervention in children with a cleft palate in terms of speech, quality of life, and cost-utility as provided by first-line speech-language pathologists by conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial. The final goal is to utilize this program in clinical practice and to create awareness of the benefits for children with a cleft palate among stakeholders.",[72,34,73,74],"Cleft Palate Children","Speech Disorders in Children","Cleft Lip and Palate",[76,77,78],"Randomized controlled trial","Speech therapy","Cleft lip and palate","RECRUITING","2025-01-09",{"date":82,"type":50},"2025-01-13",{"date":84,"type":50},"2024-11-26",{"date":86,"type":20},"2027-12",{"name":88,"class":57},"University Ghent",1,{"id":91,"slug":92,"hasResults":11,"nctId":93,"briefTitle":94,"officialTitle":95,"acronym":96,"eligibilityCriteria":97,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":98,"maxAge":99,"enrollmentInfo":100,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":102,"briefSummary":103,"conditions":104,"keywords":106,"overallStatus":46,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":113,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":114,"startDateStruct":116,"completionDateStruct":118,"leadSponsor":120,"locationsCount":4},"100570821","anomia-therapy-and-executive-function-training-in-chronic-post-stroke-aphasia-pilot-study-of-multidimensional-effects-100570821","NCT06712225","Anomia Therapy and Executive Function Training in Chronic Post-stroke Aphasia: Pilot Study of Multidimensional Effects","Combining Anomia Therapy and Executive Function Training in Chronic Post-stroke Aphasia: a Pilot Study of Multidimensional Effects","ATAC2PILOT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult (18-80 years old) with post-stroke aphasia (\\> 6 months post-stroke)\n* Participant or legal representative able to understand the aims of the study\n* Participant or legal representative who have signed an informed consent form\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aphasia with severe anarthria (mutism), comprehension disorders or alexia, incompatible with the purpose of the study\n* Contraindications for MRI\n* History of head trauma, brain tumor, neurodegenerative disease, or any other neurological or psychiatric condition\n* Non-affiliation to social welfare","18 Years","80 Years",{"count":101,"type":20},8,[23],"The goal of this clinical trial is to measure the effects of a speech therapy protocol combining anomia therapy and executive function training on naming and discourse in people with chronic aphasia, and to study the related brain changes.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does the protocol improve naming skills ?\n* Do the improvements observed transfer to discourse abilities ?\n* Are there any brain changes induced by this protocol ?\n\nResearchers will compare anomia therapy alone to anomia therapy + executive function training to see if the latter works better.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Have a whole language assessment and a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan in the hospital before and after the protocol\n* Receive 18 sessions of the protocol, 3 times a week during 6 weeks, in the hospital\n* Have several naming assessments during the protocol",[105,34],"Aphasia, Acquired",[107,108,109,110,111,112],"Post-stroke aphasia","Speech-therapy","Anomia therapy","Executive function","Discourse","Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging","2024-11-29",{"date":115,"type":50},"2024-12-02",{"date":117,"type":20},"2025-01",{"date":119,"type":20},"2025-10",{"name":121,"class":57},"University Hospital, Montpellier",{"id":123,"slug":124,"hasResults":11,"nctId":125,"briefTitle":126,"officialTitle":127,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":128,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":65,"maxAge":66,"enrollmentInfo":129,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":131,"briefSummary":132,"conditions":133,"keywords":134,"overallStatus":79,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":135,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":136,"startDateStruct":138,"completionDateStruct":140,"leadSponsor":142,"locationsCount":89},"100524159","effect-of-performance-specific-cleft-speech-intervention-and-long-term-learning-in-children-with-a-cleft-palate-100524159","NCT06105099","Effect of Performance-specific Cleft Speech Intervention and Long-term Learning in Children With a Cleft Palate","One Size Does Not Fit All: From a Common Approach Towards Performance-specific Speech Intervention and Long-term Learning in Children With a Cleft Palate","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip\n* Aged between 4 and 12 years\n* Presence of at least one compensatory speech error in their speech based on the perceptual assessment of one experienced speech-language pathologist\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with syndromic clefts\n* Oronasal fistula\n* Velopharyngeal insufficiency\n* Hearing disabilities based on pure tone audiometry (\\>25 dB HL)\n* Cognitive and\u002For related learning disabilities or neuromuscular disorders",{"count":130,"type":20},135,[23],"Speech therapy in children with a palate deals with two scientific challenges that will be addressed in this project.\n\nThe first challenge is selecting the best speech approach for a child with a specific cleft speech characteristic (CSC). Many speech therapists use a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to treat compensatory CSCs resulting in poor short- and long-term speech outcomes. To increase the effectiveness and quality of cleft speech care, it is necessary to find the best match between a specific therapy and a given type of CSC. Therefore, this proposal will compare the effect of 3 different speech approaches on the speech and quality of life in Dutch speaking children with different types of CSCs.\n\nThe second challenge is selecting the best speech approach to enhance long-term learning and transfer of newly established speech skills to untrained consonants. To date, research mainly focused on immediate therapy effects. It is unknown if permanent speech changes occur. Hence, this project will also investigate the short-term and long-term learning effects (retention and transfer) of the different speech approaches from the first objective.\n\nThis proposal will improve evidence-based and patient-tailored cleft speech therapy.",[72,73,74,34],[76,77,78],"2023-10-23",{"date":137,"type":50},"2023-10-27",{"date":139,"type":50},"2022-10-01",{"date":141,"type":20},"2026-09-30",{"name":88,"class":57}]