[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"spinal-instability\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:spinal-instability":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,45,74],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100462071","post-market-clinical-follow-up-study-on-the-safety-and-performance-of-ennovate-cervical-100462071",false,"NCT05296889","Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical","Multicenter Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical - a Prospective Study on Total Indications","CERISE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient is minimum 18 years old\n* Informed Consent in the documentation of clinical and radiological results\n* Patient has indication according to Instructions for Use (IFU)\n* Patient is not pregnant\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient's clear unability or unwillingness to participate in follow-up examinations","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},200,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Multicenter Post market clinical follow-up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical - Prospective, pure data collection of all Ennovate Cervical patients in Total Indications",[25,26,27,28,29],"Spine Fracture","Degenerative Disc Disease","Spinal Instability","Spinal Tumor","Degenerative Myelopathy",[31],"Cervical Spine","RECRUITING","2026-03-26",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-03-31","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":36},"2021-07-21",{"date":40,"type":21},"2026-07",{"name":42,"class":43},"Aesculap AG","INDUSTRY",4,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":55,"phases":56,"briefSummary":58,"conditions":59,"keywords":60,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":63,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":64,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":73},"100585589","clube-ube-stability--dynamic-radio-100585589","NCT06904326","CLUBE (UBE Stability \u002F Dynamic Radio)","Assessment of Spinal Stability by Dynamic Radiography After Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient ≥ 50 ans,\n* Patient requiring single-level or 2-levels lumbar decompression surgery under UBE,\n* Patients who underwent dynamic radiography within 3 months prior to surgery,\n* Patient who received information on the study and who signed the consent form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of a mobile spondylolisthesis with a ≥ 3 mm difference between flexion and extension movements on preoperative dynamic radiography,\n* Patient with history of lumbar arthrodesis,\n* Patient not available for study follow-up.","50 Years",{"count":54,"type":21},400,"INTERVENTIONAL",[57],"NA","Degenerative pathologies of the spine affect a large proportion of the increasingly ageing population, and are a major public health issue. When conservative treatments (physiotherapy, analgesics, infiltrations) fail, surgical treatment is preferred.\n\nTraditionally, a simple lumbar recalibration operation is preferred (bilateral laminectomy decompression), but this may affect spinal stability. In cases of spondylolisthesis or preoperative instability, lumbar fusion (arthrodesis) is sometimes necessary to avoid the risk of major instability, but such an operation is not without risk and may require repeat surgery.\n\nThe development of new surgical techniques such as uni or bilateral laminotomies, which are less radical, has made it possible to avoid some arthrodeses. Nowadays, the emergence of new surgical techniques such as endoscopy has further reduced the risk of destabilization (shorter post-operative convalescence, less atrophy of the paraspinal muscles) and improved surgeon comfort (better vision and easier instrument handling).\n\nUnilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is one of two endoscopic techniques and has proven its effectiveness for lumbar decompression in terms of clinical benefits. However, there is no scientific evidence on spinal stability after recalibration under UBE.\n\nWe believe that minimizing invasiveness with UBE during simple lumbar recalibration surgery can preserve spinal stability, thereby reducing the need for lumbar fixation and lowering the cost of care.\n\nWe therefore propose to study the maintenance of spinal stability using dynamic radiography at 3 months post-operatively in patients undergoing lumbar recalibration surgery with UBE.",[27],[61,62],"biportal endoscopy","lumbar surgery","2025-11-21",{"date":65,"type":36},"2025-11-26",{"date":67,"type":36},"2025-05-22",{"date":69,"type":21},"2027-08",{"name":71,"class":72},"Clinique Saint Jean, France","OTHER",1,{"id":75,"slug":76,"hasResults":11,"nctId":77,"briefTitle":78,"officialTitle":79,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":80,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":81,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":82,"conditions":83,"keywords":88,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":95,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":96,"startDateStruct":98,"completionDateStruct":100,"leadSponsor":102,"locationsCount":73},"100489081","intraoperative-monitoring-for-the-lateral-lumbar-interbody-fusion-procedure-100489081","NCT05648474","Intraoperative Monitoring for the Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedure","Advanced Techniques in Intraoperative Monitoring for the Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedure: a Utility Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* At least 18 years of age at the time of planned surgery.\n* Indicated for 1- or 2-level instrumented LLIF surgery (in either prone or lateral decubitus positions), inclusive of the L4-5 disc space.\n* Written informed consent obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients requiring surgical treatment at more than 2 lumbar levels.\n* Patients with peripheral neuropathy such as from diabetes or other conditions that might affect the reliability of intraoperative neuromonitoring.\n* Patients with prior history of partial\u002Ffull hip or knee joint replacement surgery (i.e., arthroplasty or resurfacing) on the leg targeted for saphenous monitoring and electrode placement.\n* Patients with presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.\n* Female patients who are pregnant or wanting to become pregnant during the timeframe of study participation.\n* Patients participating in another clinical study which may compromise this study's results or compliance with this study's procedures.",{"count":54,"type":21},"This study is designed to evaluate the clinical utility of a known intraoperative neuromonitoring modality (SSEP) using saphenous nerve as the site of stimulation to identify changes to the lumbar nerves which may be at risk during the lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedure.",[84,85,86,87,27],"Intervertebral Disc Degeneration","Stenosis, Spinal","Spondylolisthesis","Spinal Deformity",[89,90,91,92,93,94],"Spine","Surgery","Adult","Neuromonitoring","Electromyography","Somatosensory evoked potentials","2024-10-22",{"date":97,"type":36},"2024-10-24",{"date":99,"type":36},"2022-07-13",{"date":101,"type":21},"2025-12-31",{"name":103,"class":43},"Alphatec Spine, Inc."]