[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"supraglottic-airways\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:supraglottic-airways":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,48],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":22,"studyType":23,"phases":4,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100635622","comparison-of-gastric-volume-changes-after-ventilation-with-endotracheal-tube-first-generation-supraglottic-airway-and-second-generation-supraglottic-airway-in-pediatric-patients-100635622",false,"NCT07555080","Comparison of Gastric Volume Changes After Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube, First-Generation Supraglottic Airway, and Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway in Pediatric Patients","Comparison of Gastric Volume Changes Via Ultrasound After Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube, First-Generation Supraglottic Airway, and Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1-10 years of age\n* Adherence to standard preoperative fasting guidelines\n* Elective surgeries\n* ASA I-III status\n* Surgery time 30 min to 2 hours\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Gastrointestinal tract surgeries\n* Laparoscopic surgeries\n* Emergency procedures\n* Full stomach patients\n* Lack of parental\u002Fguardian consent","ALL","1 Year","10 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},250,"ESTIMATED","1 Day","OBSERVATIONAL","This study aims to compare the gastric volumes of pediatric patients undergoing positive-pressure ventilation with different airway management techniques. Gastric ultrasound is a non-invasive bedside tool with high sensitivity and specificity for determining the nature and amount of gastric content. In pediatric cases, maintaining a gastric volume below 1.25 mL\u002Fkg is associated with a lower risk of perioperative aspiration.\n\nAlthough supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are commonly used as alternatives to endotracheal tubes, concerns regarding the potential for gastric insufflation and subsequent aspiration persist. Second-generation SADs were specifically designed with gastric drainage channels to mitigate the risk of regurgitation compared to first-generation devices.\n\nThe primary objective of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in gastric volumes, as measured by ultrasound, among three groups of pediatric patients: those managed with endotracheal tubes, first-generation SADs, and second-generation SADs. By comparing these measurements post-ventilation, the investigators aim to evaluate the impact of the airway device choice on gastric volume under clinical conditions.",[26,27,28,29,30,31],"Gastric Ultrasonography","Supraglottic Airways","Supraglottic Airway Use in Children","Gastric Volume","Gastric Insufflation","Airway Complications",[33,34],"gastric ultrasonography","airway management","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-04",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-06-08","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":21},"2026-06-15",{"date":43,"type":21},"2026-09",{"name":45,"class":46},"Istanbul University","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":55,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":58,"phases":59,"briefSummary":61,"conditions":62,"keywords":66,"overallStatus":75,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":76,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":77,"startDateStruct":79,"completionDateStruct":81,"leadSponsor":83,"locationsCount":47},"100595041","the-insertion-of-i-gel-and-classic-lma-in-different-head-positions-in-elderly-patients-100595041","NCT07027293","The Insertion of I-gel and Classic LMA in Different Head Positions in Elderly Patients","Evaluation of the Insertion of I-gel and Classic LMA in Different Head Positions in Elderly Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA classification I-III\n* Age over 75 years\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known or anticipated difficult airway\n* Contraindications for the use of a supraglottic airway device\n* Patients scheduled for endotracheal intubation","75 Years",{"count":57,"type":21},120,"INTERVENTIONAL",[60],"NA","This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study aims to evaluate the insertion success of two supraglottic airway devices, the classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and the I-gel, in different head and neck positions in elderly patients undergoing elective urological surgery under general anesthesia. A total of 120 patients aged over 75 years with ASA physical status I-III will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: standard position with I-gel, right lateral rotation with I-gel, standard position with classic LMA, and right lateral rotation with classic LMA. The study will compare insertion time, ease and success of placement, number of attempts, hemodynamic responses, oropharyngeal leak pressures, fiberoptic scores, and airway-related complications. The findings aim to provide clinical guidance on the optimal use of supraglottic airway devices in geriatric patients in various head positions.",[63,27,64,65],"Airway Management Assessment","Supraglottic Airways for General Anesthesia","Laryngeal Mask Airways",[67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74],"Supraglottic airway device","i-gel","Classic laryngeal mask airway","Elderly patients","Airway management","Head position","General anesthesia","Insertion success","RECRUITING","2025-09-10",{"date":78,"type":39},"2025-09-17",{"date":80,"type":39},"2025-06-20",{"date":82,"type":21},"2025-09-15",{"name":84,"class":46},"Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey"]