[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"supraspinatus-tear\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:supraspinatus-tear":24},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,44,70],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":16,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":19,"phases":20,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":23,"keywords":25,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100616899","a-study-on-the-effectiveness-of-preventive-extensive-release-of-the-rotator-interval-and-joint-capsule-to-reduce-postoperative-stiffness-in-arthroscopic-rotator-cuff-repair-100616899",false,"NCT07311616","A Study on the Effectiveness of Preventive Extensive Release of the Rotator Interval and Joint Capsule to Reduce Postoperative Stiffness in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Medium to small-sized (tear size \\\u003C3 cm) full-thickness supraspinatus muscle tears\n2. There was no shoulder joint stiffness before the operation. The range of motion of the joint was at least 160° for passive forward flexion under ROM anesthesia, 60° for external rotation when abduction was 0°, and equal to or greater than 60° for passive internal rotation at the level of the 10th thoracic vertebra\n3. About to undergo ARCR\n4. No history of trauma\n5. Patient consent to participate\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. There was a history of previous surgery on the ipsilateral shoulder\n2. Other injuries or lesions of the ipsilateral shoulder (such as glenohumeral arthritis, combined acromioclavicular joint dislocation, brachial plexus injury, etc.)\n3. It can not be completely repaired or even repaired during operation\n4. Have uncontrolled epilepsy or psychological illness\n5. Patients who were assessed as not suitable for inclusion in the study group","ALL",{"count":17,"type":18},50,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[21],"NA","The incidence of rotator cuff injuries is high, especially among the elderly. With the aging of the population, the number of surgical patients has increased significantly. However, in the early stage after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, a considerable proportion of patients are troubled by shoulder joint stiffness, which greatly affects the quality of life and satisfaction of patients after the operation. Despite this, there is still a lack of clear evidence-based medical evidence regarding whether preventive extensive shoulder release and joint capsule release during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can effectively prevent or alleviate postoperative shoulder stiffness. To clarify this clinical issue, this project intends to conduct a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). Before the operation, patients will be randomly divided into two groups under blinding conditions: the experimental group will receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery along with preventive extensive shoulder joint release and joint capsule release, while the control group will only receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. After the operation, the investigators will conduct follow-up visits for 3 months, 6 months and 12 months for the two groups of patients, and perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the 12th month to assess the healing of the rotator cuff tendons. ASES score, Constant-Murley score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and active range (ROM) assessment were conducted before the operation and at the follow-up at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation. The occurrence of postoperative complications of the patients was counted at the last follow-up. Through this study, the investigators expect to provide scientific and effective guidance for the prevention of postoperative adhesions of the shoulder joint.",[24],"Supraspinatus Tear",[26,27,28,29,30],"Rotator cuff repair","Postoperative stiffness","Joint capsule release","Randomized controlled trial","Range of motion of the shoulder joint","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-12-16",{"date":34,"type":35},"2025-12-31","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":18},"2025-12-22",{"date":39,"type":18},"2027-12-01",{"name":41,"class":42},"Beijing Jishuitan Hospital","OTHER",1,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":51,"maxAge":52,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":19,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":58,"overallStatus":60,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":61,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":62,"startDateStruct":64,"completionDateStruct":66,"leadSponsor":68,"locationsCount":43},"100484626","novel-treatment-for-rotator-cuff-tears-100484626","NCT05590494","Novel Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears","Ultrasonic Tenotomy as a Treatment of Partial Rotator Cuff Tear of the Supraspinatus Tendon: A Pilot Feasibility Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Evidence of partial tear (\\\u003C 50%) of the supraspinatus tendon on MRI.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* A tear of the supraspinatus tendon greater \\> 50% and any areas of full thickness tearing, concomitant tears \\> 25% of other rotator cuff tendons (infraspinatus, teres minor or subscapularis), or acute tear of the glenoid labrum.\n* Evidence of systemic illness\u002Finfection requiring oral or IV antibiotics during the recruitment period.\n* Evidence of overlying skin infection or lesion at the proposed device insertion point on the shoulder.\n* Previous corticosteroid injection within three months.\n* Those individuals less than 25 and greater than 75 years of age will be excluded.","25 Years","75 Years",{"count":54,"type":18},15,[21],"The focus of this study is to examine changes in pain scores, strength, and range of motion over time following an ultrasonic tenotomy on a partial tear (\\\u003C50%) of the supraspinatus tendon of the rotator cuff.",[24],[59],"Ultrasonic tenotomy","RECRUITING","2025-07-29",{"date":63,"type":35},"2025-08-01",{"date":65,"type":35},"2022-11-07",{"date":67,"type":18},"2028-12",{"name":69,"class":42},"Mayo Clinic",{"id":71,"slug":72,"hasResults":11,"nctId":73,"briefTitle":74,"officialTitle":75,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":76,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":77,"maxAge":78,"enrollmentInfo":79,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":19,"phases":81,"briefSummary":82,"conditions":83,"keywords":84,"overallStatus":60,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":90,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":91,"startDateStruct":93,"completionDateStruct":95,"leadSponsor":97,"locationsCount":99},"100489969","treatment-of-the-biceps-with-concomitant-supraspinatus-tears-100489969","NCT05660031","Treatment of the Biceps With Concomitant Supraspinatus Tears","Treatment of the Biceps With Concomitant Supraspinatus Tears: A Multicenter Pragmatic Three-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Surgical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient voluntarily consents to participate in the study and has the mental and physical ability to participate in the study, fill out subjective questionnaires, return for follow-up visits, and comply with prescribed post-operative physical therapy.\n* Full thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon\n* Intact subscapularis tendon\n* Primary rotator cuff repair\n* Age 50-80\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous full thickness biceps tear\n* Infection and neuropathic joints\n* Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse\n* Patients incapable of judgement or under tutelage\n* Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, contraindication for MRI scan etc.\n* Enrolment of the investigator, his\u002Fher family members, employees and other dependent persons\n* Patient declines to participate in study","50 Years","80 Years",{"count":80,"type":18},180,[21],"The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is thought to be a common source of shoulder pain and dysfunction in patients with rotator cuff pathology. Tenotomy and tenodesis have been shown to produce favourable and comparable results in treating LHB lesions, but a controversy still exists regarding the treatment of choice. Some suggest that tenotomy should be reserved for older, low-demand patients, while tenodesis should be performed in younger patients and those who engage in heavy labor. Proponents of tenotomy suggest that this is a technically easy procedure that leads to easy rehabilitation and fast return to activity with a low complication and reoperation rate. However, those who support LHB tenodesis list good preservation of elbow flexion and supination strength, improvement of functional scores, elimination of pain, and avoidance of cosmetic deformity as benefits of the procedure. Alternatively, the LHB can be maintained in the joint without tenodesis or tenotomy. In fact, it has not been clearly shown that LHB tenodesis or tenotomy leads to improved outcomes compared to leaving the biceps tendon intact.",[24],[85,86,87,88,89],"Long head of the biceps","Supraspinatus tear","tenotomy","tenodesis","rotator cuff repair","2025-04-23",{"date":92,"type":35},"2025-04-25",{"date":94,"type":35},"2021-06-01",{"date":96,"type":18},"2026-06-01",{"name":98,"class":42},"La Tour Hospital",4]