[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"surgical-procedures\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:surgical-procedures":32},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,51],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":33,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":39,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":40,"startDateStruct":43,"completionDateStruct":45,"leadSponsor":47,"locationsCount":50},"100635690","comparing-clean-intermittent-self-catheterization-and-indwelling-catheterization-for-the-management-of-urinary-retention-before-bph-surgery-100635690",false,"NCT07555964","Comparing Clean Intermittent Self-catheterization and Indwelling Catheterization for the Management of Urinary Retention Before BPH Surgery.","Comparing Clean Intermittent Self-catheterization and Indwelling Catheterization for the Management of Urinary Retention Before BPH Surgery.l","CATHETERS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Men over 50 years old;\n* Confirmed diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH);\n* Prostate volume greater than 40 grams;\n* Presence of acute urinary retention with failure to wean from the catheter despite medical treatment with alpha-blocker for at least 48 hours\n* Indication for surgical management of BPH;\n* Patient affiliated with or a beneficiary of a social security scheme;\n* Signed informed consent for participation in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with a history of prostate surgery (including BPH surgery), prostatic artery embolization or Urolift implant placement are not considered a history of prostate surgery;\n* Patient with symptomatic urethral stricture;\n* Patient with a bladder emptying disorder of neurogenic origin;\n* Patient with an anatomical contraindication to ICSC (urethral stricture, false urethral route);\n* Patient who had urine drainage by suprapubic catheter\n* Patient with motor, neurological, anatomical, or cognitive difficulties preventing the education or learning of ICSC;\n* Patient contraindicated for surgical management of their BPH;\n* Patient unable to understand the research documents and provide informed consent;\n* Persons subject to legal protection measures or placed under judicial protection.","MALE","50 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},106,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The CATHETERS trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label superiority study comparing two methods of managing urinary retention before surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): clean intermittent self-catheterization (ICSC) versus indwelling catheter (IDC). The primary objective is to determine whether ICSC reduces the occurrence of infectious complications (urinary bacterial colonization requiring antibiotic therapy, urinary tract infection, or urosepsis) compared to IDC in men awaiting BPH surgery. A total of 106 patients will be enrolled across multiple centers in France, with follow-up extending to three months after surgery.",[27,28,29,30,31,32],"Prostatic Hyperplasia","Urinary Retention","Urinary Catheterization","Intermittent Urethral Catheterization","Urinary Tract Infections","Surgical Procedures",[34,35,36,37],"BPH","ICSC","IDC","Urinary Tractus Infection","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-21",{"date":41,"type":42},"2026-04-29","ACTUAL",{"date":44,"type":21},"2026-04-24",{"date":46,"type":21},"2028-04-24",{"name":48,"class":49},"University Hospital, Bordeaux","OTHER",5,{"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":11,"nctId":54,"briefTitle":55,"officialTitle":56,"acronym":57,"eligibilityCriteria":58,"healthyVolunteers":59,"sex":60,"minAge":61,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":62,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":64,"briefSummary":65,"conditions":66,"keywords":70,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":74,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":75,"startDateStruct":77,"completionDateStruct":78,"leadSponsor":80,"locationsCount":4},"100599822","impact-of-anesthesia-alarm-volume-on-mental-workload-in-surgical-trainees-100599822","NCT07089485","Impact of Anesthesia Alarm Volume on Mental Workload in Surgical Trainees","Impact of Anesthesia Alarm Volume on Mental Workload in Surgical Trainees: A Randomized Pilot Simulation Study","ASLEC02","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Surgical residents or experienced surgeons;\n* Surgeons with normal hearing;\n* Surgeons capable of performing surgical sutures (regardless of skill level);\n* Surgeons able and willing to follow all study procedures according to the protocol;\n* Surgeons who have understood, signed, and dated the informed consent form provided on the day of enrollment.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Surgeons undergoing beta-blocker treatment;\n* Surgeons with known cardiac pathology;\n* Surgeons who do not consent to participate in the study;\n* Surgeons with known hearing problems;\n* Surgeons who fail the hearing test;\n* Surgeons who worked on-call or night shifts during the night before the evaluation day.\n* Surgical trainees at the Lorraine Cancer Institute.\n* Adults under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or legal supervision);Persons deprived of liberty;Pregnant or breastfeeding women.",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":63,"type":21},26,[24],"Noise in hospital environments, particularly in operating rooms, poses challenges to both patient comfort and healthcare professionals' performance. Among the sources of noise, anesthesia monitoring alarms are essential for patient safety, yet no clear guidelines exist regarding their optimal sound level. Excessive alarm volume may increase distraction and cognitive load, especially for surgical trainees, potentially impairing their focus and performance during procedures. This randomized pilot interventional study aims to evaluate the impact of anesthesia alarm sound intensity on the mental workload of surgical trainees performing simulated surgeries. Participants will be randomly assigned to conditions with either an optimized alarm volume or a higher standard volume during simulated tasks. Cognitive load will be assessed using objective physiological measures such as heart rate variability and pupillometry, as well as subjective evaluations with tools like the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX scales. The primary goal is to determine whether an optimized alarm sound level can reduce cognitive strain without compromising vigilance required for patient safety. Findings from this study are expected to provide evidence-based recommendations for auditory ergonomics in operating rooms, ultimately improving working conditions for surgical teams and enhancing both training and patient safety.",[32,67,68,69],"Noise","Hearing Disorder","Mental Workload",[71,72,73],"Noise\u002Fadverse effects","Cognition Disorders","Surgical procedures","2025-09-22",{"date":76,"type":42},"2025-09-25",{"date":76,"type":21},{"date":79,"type":21},"2026-09-26",{"name":81,"class":49},"Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine"]