[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"tic-douloureux\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:tic-douloureux":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,56],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":14,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":21,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":44,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":45,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":46,"startDateStruct":49,"completionDateStruct":51,"leadSponsor":53,"locationsCount":5},"100603323","prospective-register-study-to-assess-eligibility-for-and-efficacy-of-surgical-treatment-in-patients-with-neurovascular-conflict-100603323",false,"NCT07135024","Prospective Register Study to Assess Eligibility for and Efficacy of Surgical Treatment in Patients With nEuRovascular Conflict","PETER registry","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* suspected neurovascular conflict\n* signed consent for further use of routine clinical data as accepted by local regulations\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* refusal of further use of routine clinical data","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},5001,"ESTIMATED","5 Years","OBSERVATIONAL","The aim of the registry is a multicenter, prospective long-term data collection of patients suspected neurovascular conflict and referred for possible microvascular decompression (Jannetta procedure). The registry relies exclusively on routinely collected clinical data, which are gathered in a standardized and privacy-compliant manner as part of everyday clinical practice. By systematically compiling this information across multiple centers, valuable insights into the effectiveness, potential side effects, and long-term outcomes of this surgical treatment can be gained. The registry will serve as a foundation for future scientific analyses and is intended to help answer relevant research questions regarding the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia based on solid evidence.",[25,26,27,28,29,30],"Trigeminal Neuralgia","Tic Douloureux","Facial Pain","Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia","Hemifacial Spasm","Neurovascular Conflict",[25,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43],"Registry","prospective study","eligibility determination","efficacy, treatment","Follow-Up Studies","indication","microvascular decompression","Jannetta","tic douloureux","hemifacial spasm","neurovascular conflict","glossopharyngeal neuralgia","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-08-13",{"date":47,"type":48},"2025-08-21","ACTUAL",{"date":50,"type":20},"2025-10-01",{"date":52,"type":20},"2033-10-01",{"name":54,"class":55},"Gerrit A Schubert","OTHER",{"id":57,"slug":58,"hasResults":11,"nctId":59,"briefTitle":60,"officialTitle":61,"acronym":62,"eligibilityCriteria":63,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":64,"maxAge":65,"enrollmentInfo":66,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":68,"phases":69,"briefSummary":71,"conditions":72,"keywords":74,"overallStatus":44,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":79,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":80,"startDateStruct":82,"completionDateStruct":84,"leadSponsor":86,"locationsCount":88},"100593981","comparison-of-two-types-of-radiofrequency-treatment-for-trigeminal-neuralgia-100593981","NCT07013500","Comparison of Two Types of Radiofrequency Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia","Comparison of Gasserian Ganglion Conventional Radiofrequency and Peripheral Pulsed Radiofrequency in Trigeminal Neuralgia","TN-RFA-MEU25","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 55 and 80 years with a diagnosis of classical trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3). Patients must have experienced pain refractory to medical management for at least 6 months and have complete clinical and procedural records available, including follow-up data for a minimum of 6 months.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with secondary trigeminal neuralgia due to structural causes such as multiple sclerosis or tumors, those with a history of prior craniofacial surgery or neuroablative procedures, patients lacking sufficient follow-up data, and those with contraindications to sedation or with uncontrolled systemic comorbidities are excluded from the study.","55 Years","80 Years",{"count":67,"type":20},60,"INTERVENTIONAL",[70],"NA","Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic pain condition that affects the face, often causing sharp, electric shock-like pain in areas served by the trigeminal nerve. When medications are no longer effective, interventional procedures such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be used. This retrospective study compares two different RFA techniques in patients with classical TN: (1) conventional thermal RFA applied to the Gasserian ganglion, and (2) pulsed RFA applied peripherally to the nerve branches.\n\nThe purpose of the study is to evaluate pain relief, patient satisfaction, and complication rates between these two commonly used techniques. A total of 60 patients aged 55-80 years, who were treated at the Mersin University Pain Clinic between January 2015 and June 2025, were included. The study uses clinical records and follow-up data to assess outcomes at 6 months post-procedure.\n\nThis study aims to provide clinicians with more evidence to guide the selection of safer and more effective treatments for trigeminal neuralgia, with the goal of improving patients' quality of life and reducing treatment-related side effects.",[25,26,73],"Neuropathic Facial Pain",[25,75,76,77,78],"Radiofrequency Ablation","Pulsed Radiofrequency","Gasserian Ganglion","Neuropathic Pain","2025-06-02",{"date":81,"type":48},"2025-06-10",{"date":83,"type":20},"2025-06-15",{"date":85,"type":20},"2025-07-30",{"name":87,"class":55},"Mesut Bakır",1]