[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"ultrasound-training\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:ultrasound-training":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":5},"100602751","ultrasound-simulation-or-traditional-ultrasound-training-for-general-practitioners-100602751",false,"NCT07127588","Ultrasound Simulation or Traditional Ultrasound Training for General Practitioners?","Continuing Education of General Practitioners in Clinical Ultrasound - Ultrasound Simulation or Traditional Ultrasound Training?","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* The participant must be a postgraduate medical doctor specialized in general medicine\u002Ffamily medicine (general practitioner).\n* The participant must have access to an ultrasound device during the study period.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* General practitioners who have already participated in a basic point-of-care ultrasound education for general practitioners.\n* General practitioners with potential conflicts of interest.\n* Individuals with no signed informed consent to participate.",true,"ALL",{"count":19,"type":20},24,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","The goal of this study is to compare two different educational methods for training general practitioners (GPs) in point-of-care ultrasound. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\n\\- Does the use of ultrasound phantoms and simulators result in superior post-course ultrasound skills compared to traditional training methods involving healthy volunteers? Researchers will compare a group trained with traditional methods (scanning healthy volunteers) to a group trained using ultrasound phantoms and simulators to see if the different training methods result in different levels of ultrasound proficiency.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Be 24 general practitioners randomized into two groups of 12.\n* Receive training in five clinical ultrasound examinations: 1) Aortic abdominal aneurism, 2) gallstones, 3) pleural effusion, 4) hydronephrosis, and 5) free fluid in the abdomen (FAST scan).\n* Begin with e-learning, followed by two in-person teaching seminars.\n* Train at their clinics between course days: first on healthy volunteers, then on indicated patients.\n* Upload scans to an online learning platform and receive feedback from instructors.\n* Be assessed after 90 days using the validated Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) tool, with blinded evaluators.",[26],"Ultrasound Training",[28,29,30,31,32,33],"Point-of-care ultrasound","Clinical ultrasound","Education","General practitioners","Simulation","Randomised controlled trial","RECRUITING","2025-08-14",{"date":37,"type":38},"2025-08-17","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":38},"2025-06-26",{"date":42,"type":20},"2025-12-04",{"name":44,"class":45},"Aalborg University","OTHER"]