[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"upper-abdominal-surgery\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:upper-abdominal-surgery":25},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,43,71],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":4},"100645095","non-invasive-respiratory-monitoring-to-predict-successful-separation-from-mechanical-ventilation-following-upper-abdominal-surgery-100645095",false,"NCT07678502","Non-Invasive Respiratory Monitoring to Predict Successful Separation From Mechanical Ventilation Following Upper Abdominal Surgery","NON-INVASIVE RESPIRATORY MONITORING TO PREDICT A SEPARATION FROM MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER ABDOMINAL SURGERY: THE VALUE STUDY - PREVALENCE, PREDICTIVE AND PRAGMATICAL STUDY","VALUE","Inclusion criteria\n\n* Age of ≥ 18 years\n* Post elective open upper abdominal surgery with mechanical ventilation\n* Get readiness for mechanical ventilation weaning with pressure support 5-8 cmH2O and PEEP 5-8 cmH2O set by clinical team and prompt extubation assessed by clinical team\n\nExclusion criteria\n\n* Previous tracheostomy\n* Contraindication to EIT placement: pacemaker\u002Fdefibrillator implantation, burns at the area of EIT placement\n* Patient with end-of-life plan\n* Emergency operation","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The VALUE Study is a two-phase, prospective clinical trial conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH). The study evaluates the prevalence of mechanical ventilation (MV) separation failure in post-open upper abdominal surgery patients and investigates whether non-invasive bedside respiratory monitoring tools can rapidly predict extubation failure.\n\nThe protocol focuses on Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) metrics-specifically regional ventilation distribution and the absolute ventral-to-dorsal difference-alongside ventilator-derived measures of respiratory drive. It also tracks physiological responses and clinical outcomes, including dyspnea using the Intensive Care Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (IC-RDOS) and the ROX index, across standard post-extubation oxygen delivery methods (nasal cannula vs. High-Flow Nasal Cannula \\[HFNC\\]).",[25,26],"Upper Abdominal Surgery","Critical Ill Patients in SICU",[28,29,30],"pulmonary complication","postoperative care","upper abdominal surgery","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-28",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-07-01","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":21},"2026-07",{"date":39,"type":21},"2027-12",{"name":41,"class":42},"Papawee Chennavasin","OTHER",{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":47,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":48,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":49,"maxAge":50,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":53,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":60,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":61,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":62,"startDateStruct":64,"completionDateStruct":66,"leadSponsor":68,"locationsCount":70},"100595741","acupuncture-versus-transcutaneous-electrical-nerve-stimulation-on-pain-post-upper-abdominal-surgeries-100595741","NCT07036393","Acupuncture Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain Post Upper Abdominal Surgeries","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who will have pain after upper abdominal surgery.\n* Adult patients will be between 20 and 45 years of age.\n* Both sexes will be included.\n* Patients have no contraindications for acupuncture or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.\n* Patients with good compliance and fit for treatment.\n* This study will be applied on upper abdominal surgeries \\[laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Gastrectomy\\].\n* Physical therapy will be used for up to 48 hours after surgery or until the time of discharge.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with other causes of pain other than that after upper abdominal surgery.\n* Patients who will have any contraindication for both therapies used.\n* Patients with cardiovascular disease, liver, or renal disease.\n* Patients with malignant tumors.\n* Patients with metal or electronic implants.\n* Patients with autoimmune disease.\n* Pregnancy, postpartum period, breastfeeding.\n* Patients with recent injury in the treatment area","20 Years","45 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},"INTERVENTIONAL",[54],"NA","This study was done to:\n\n* Determine the therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture as physical therapy approach in minimizing pain post upper abdominal surgeries.\n* Determine the therapeutic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in minimizing pain post upper abdominal surgeries.\n* Compare the efficacy and safety of Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus acupuncture in minimizing pain post upper abdominal surgeries.",[57,58,59,25],"Acupuncture","Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation","Pain","RECRUITING","2025-06-24",{"date":63,"type":35},"2025-06-25",{"date":65,"type":35},"2025-04-15",{"date":67,"type":21},"2025-07-15",{"name":69,"class":42},"Cairo University",1,{"id":72,"slug":73,"hasResults":11,"nctId":74,"briefTitle":75,"officialTitle":76,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":77,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":78,"maxAge":79,"enrollmentInfo":80,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":82,"briefSummary":83,"conditions":84,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":60,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":88,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":89,"startDateStruct":91,"completionDateStruct":93,"leadSponsor":95,"locationsCount":70},"100566396","ultrasound-guided-rhomboid-intercostal-plane-block-versus-thoracic-erector-spinae-plane-block-in-upper-abdominal-surgery-100566396","NCT06654635","Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block Versus Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block in Upper Abdominal Surgery","Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block and Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 21-65 years.\n* Both gender.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II.\n* Presented for elective upper abdominal surgery.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients refused to participate.\n* Patients with known or suspected allergy to the used medication.\n* Patients with preoperative chronic pain.\n* Patients with major cardiac, renal, respiratory, or hepatic disease.\n* Patients with potential risk of coagulopathy.\n* Obese patients with body mass index (BMI) \\>35.","21 Years","65 Years",{"count":81,"type":21},60,[54],"The aim of the work is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided rhomboid intercostal plane block versus ultrasound guided thoracic erector spinae block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery.",[85,86,87,25],"Ultrasound","Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block","Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block","2024-10-22",{"date":90,"type":35},"2024-10-23",{"date":92,"type":35},"2024-01-01",{"date":94,"type":21},"2025-05-01",{"name":96,"class":42},"Tanta University"]