[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"upper-extremity-function\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:upper-extremity-function":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,43,84,116,149],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":4},"100629857","motor-imaging-neglect-and-upper-extremity-function-in-stroke-100629857",false,"NCT07480122","Motor Imaging, Neglect, and Upper Extremity Function in Stroke","Investigation of the Relationship Between Motor Imagery Skill and Neglect Level, Upper Extremity Motor Function, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life in Individuals After Stroke","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals who have experienced hemiplegia after an ischemic stroke,\n* who actively use their right extremity according to the Edinburgh Hand Preference Questionnaire,\n* who have right hemisphere involvement,\n* who are 18 years of age or older,\n* who have been diagnosed with a stroke at least 1 and at most 6 months ago,\n* who have middle cerebral artery involvement,\n* who have a Standardized Mini Mental Test score of 24 or higher,\n* who are Stage 2b or higher according to Eggers staging,\n* who can actively control their hand, wrist, and fingers and perform the release reflex,\n* who wish to participate in the study voluntarily, and\n* who have given their informed consent will be included in the research.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with major neurological, orthopedic, or rheumatological disorders affecting upper extremity function other than stroke (Polyneuropathy, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, etc.),\n* Individuals with upper extremity amputation,\n* Individuals with uncontrolled arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension, or unstable cardiac conditions,\n* Individuals with active malignancy and receiving related chemo\u002Fradiotherapy,\n* Individuals unable to cooperate due to aphasia or cognitive impairment,\n* Individuals with visual and hearing problems,\n* Individuals with communication problems that would hinder the evaluation and\u002For implementation of the treatment program,\n* Individuals who are unable to undergo mental assessment, complete the scales, or are illiterate will be excluded from the study.","ALL","30 Years","80 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},50,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","This study aims to investigate the relationship between motor imagery skills and neglect level, upper extremity motor function, activities of daily living, quality of life, lateralization performance, and mental timer performance in individuals with stroke. Individuals with stroke who meet the inclusion criteria and voluntarily agree to participate will be evaluated. Demographic and clinical information of the participants will be recorded on an assessment form prepared by the researcher. Upper extremity motor functions will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale and the Wolf Motor Function Test; activities of daily living will be assessed using the Modified Barthel Index; and quality of life will be assessed using the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Motor imagery skills will be measured using the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire and a mental timer task; upper extremity lateralization performance will be assessed using the Recognise™ application. Neglect level will be assessed using the Catherine Bergego Scale, the Line Splitting Test, and the Star Erase Test. The data obtained will be statistically analyzed to examine the relationships between motor imagery skills and other clinical variables.",[25,26,27,28,29,30],"Stroke","Neglect, Hemispatial","Motor ımargery","Upper Extremity Function","Daily Life Activity","Quality of Life","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-21",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-05-22","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":21},"2026-05-25",{"date":39,"type":21},"2026-08-15",{"name":41,"class":42},"Inonu University","OTHER",{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":11,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":49,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":16,"minAge":52,"maxAge":53,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":57,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":74,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":75,"startDateStruct":77,"completionDateStruct":79,"leadSponsor":81,"locationsCount":83},"100632553","placebo-effect-of-immediate-kinesio-taping-on-upper-extremity-performance-in-healthy-adults-100632553","NCT07515183","Placebo Effect of Immediate Kinesio Taping on Upper Extremity Performance in Healthy Adults","Immediate Effects of Kinesio Taping on Upper Extremity Motor Performance and Perceived Function in Healthy Adults: A Sham-controlled Randomized Study","KT-PLACEBO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Being healthy adult between 18-40 years\n* No current pain or injury in the dominant upper extremity\n* No history of chronic musculoskeletal conditions affecting the upper extremity\n* Ability to read, understand, and provide informed consent\n* Regular use of a standard keyboard and mouse, with a minimum self-reported typing frequency of ≥5 hours per week, ensuring familiarity with digital typing tasks and adequate baseline fine motor coordination.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Respiratory, neurological, or cardiovascular disorders\n* History of surgery or fracture in the dominant upper extremity within the last six months\n* Known allergy or skin sensitivity to adhesives or Kinesio Tape materials\n* Current use of medications affecting physical performance or sensation\n* Participation in ongoing physical therapy or rehabilitation\n* Diagnosed cognitive impairment or visual deficits that could affect typing or reaction-time performance\n* Engagement in high-level upper extremity sports (\\>10 hours\u002Fweek) that could bias grip or typing performance",true,"18 Years","40 Years",{"count":55,"type":21},36,"INTERVENTIONAL",[58],"NA","This study investigates whether Kinesio Taping has immediate effects on upper extremity performance in healthy adults and whether these effects may be influenced by placebo mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping, sham Kinesio Taping, or no intervention.\n\nAll participants complete tests of hand function, including grip strength, typing performance, reaction time, and manual dexterity, before and after a short standardized waiting period. Participants also rate their perceived performance, comfort, and overall change.\n\nThe purpose of this study is to determine whether improvements in performance are due to the mechanical effects of the tape or related to sensory and expectation-based (placebo) factors.",[28,61,62,63],"Motor Performance","Healthy Volunteers","Perceived Function",[65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73],"Kinesio Taping","Placebo Effect","Upper Extremity Performance","Grip Strength","Reaction Time","Manual Dexterity","Healthy Adults","Sham-Controlled Trial","Strength","2026-04-06",{"date":76,"type":35},"2026-04-09",{"date":78,"type":21},"2026-04-01",{"date":80,"type":21},"2026-09-30",{"name":82,"class":42},"Istinye University",1,{"id":85,"slug":86,"hasResults":11,"nctId":87,"briefTitle":88,"officialTitle":89,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":90,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":91,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":92,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":94,"briefSummary":95,"conditions":96,"keywords":98,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":106,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":107,"startDateStruct":109,"completionDateStruct":111,"leadSponsor":113,"locationsCount":83},"100630696","ai-based-customized-tdcs-for-finger-motor-recovery-after-subacute-stroke-100630696","NCT07491029","AI-based Customized tDCS for Finger Motor Recovery After Subacute Stroke","A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Prospective, Superiority Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-based Customized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using MR Images for Improving Finger Motor Function in Patients With Finger Paralysis Due to Subacute Stroke","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nParticipants must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for this clinical trial:\n\n1. Adults aged 19 years or older\n2. Patients with stroke confirmed by brain imaging\n3. Subacute stroke patients within 2 weeks to 3 months after stroke onset\n4. Patients with unilateral upper-extremity paralysis\n5. Upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE, maximum score 66) score between 20 and 56\n6. Participants who voluntarily provide written informed consent after receiving and understanding the study procedures and requirements\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nParticipants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria:\n\n1. History of a condition affecting the function of the paralyzed arm\n2. Inability to follow instructions or complete the study due to cognitive impairment or aphasia\n3. Evidence of delirium, confusion, or other disorders of consciousness\n4. Presence of uncontrolled medical or surgical conditions\n5. Severe neurological disorders associated with major psychiatric conditions (e.g., major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or dementia)\n6. History of uncontrolled epilepsy (seizure disorder)\n7. Contraindications to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), including:\n\n   * Scalp disease or metal materials at the electrode attachment site\n   * Presence of a cardiac pacemaker or cochlear implant\n8. Medical contraindications to MRI examination\n9. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or those planning pregnancy during the study period\n10. Use of a stimulation device similar to the investigational device or participation in a related clinical study within the past 1 year\n11. Individuals judged by the investigator to be medically or ethically unsuitable for participation in this clinical study","19 Years",{"count":93,"type":21},116,[58],"The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate whether AI-based customized transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) using MR images is more effective than sham stimulation in improving finger motor function in patients with finger paralysis caused by subacute stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does AI-based customized tDCS improve finger motor function compared with sham stimulation?\n* What medical problems or adverse events occur when participants receive AI-based customized tDCS?\n\nResearchers will compare AI-based customized tDCS with sham stimulation (a look-alike stimulation that delivers no electrical current) to determine whether the intervention improves finger motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke.",[97,28],"Subacute Stroke",[99,100,101,102,103,104,105],"tDCS","stroke","rehabilitation","finger paralysis","upper extremity","transcranial direct current stimulation","upper limb motor function","2026-03-19",{"date":108,"type":35},"2026-03-24",{"date":110,"type":21},"2026-04-30",{"date":112,"type":21},"2027-12-31",{"name":114,"class":115},"NEUROPHET","INDUSTRY",{"id":117,"slug":118,"hasResults":11,"nctId":119,"briefTitle":120,"officialTitle":121,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":122,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":123,"maxAge":124,"enrollmentInfo":125,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":127,"briefSummary":128,"conditions":129,"keywords":133,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":140,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":141,"startDateStruct":143,"completionDateStruct":145,"leadSponsor":147,"locationsCount":4},"100625136","effects-of-spiral-strapping-systems-on-upper-limb-function-in-unilateral-spastic-cerebral-palsy-100625136","NCT07418710","Effects Of Spiral Strapping Systems On Upper Limb Function In Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy","The Effect Of Different Spiral Strapping Systems On Upper Extremity Functionality, Hand Skills, And Grip Strength In Children With Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nDiagnosis of unilateral spastic cerebral palsy\n\nAge between 4 and 15 years\n\nManual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III\n\nPresence of spasticity graded as 1, 1+, or 2 on the Modified Ashworth Scale in at least two of the following upper limb muscle groups: shoulder internal rotators, elbow flexors, forearm pronators, wrist flexors, finger flexors, or thumb adductors\n\nCommunication Function Classification System (CFCS) levels I-II\n\nGross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-III\n\nAbility to actively participate in upper limb rehabilitation interventions\n\nWritten informed consent provided by parents or legal guardians\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nUpper limb botulinum toxin injection or upper limb surgery within the last 6 months\n\nPresence of fixed contractures in the upper limb joints that may interfere with assessment or intervention protocols\n\nSevere behavioral or communication problems that would prevent participation in the study procedures\n\nUncontrolled or treatment-resistant epilepsy","4 Years","15 Years",{"count":126,"type":21},27,[58],"The purpose of this clinical study is to learn whether two different spiral strapping systems can improve arm and hand use in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. These strapping systems are used to support the arm in a more functional position and to help children control their movements during daily activities.\n\nThis study aims to answer the following main questions:\n\nDoes spiral strapping help children use their arm and hand more effectively in daily activities?\n\nDoes spiral strapping improve hand skills and grip strength?\n\nIs there a difference in effect between the two spiral strapping systems?\n\nTo answer these questions, researchers will divide participants into three groups. One group will receive a standard rehabilitation program plus TheraTogs® spiral strapping. A second group will receive the same rehabilitation program plus TogRite™ spiral strapping. The third group will receive the rehabilitation program only.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nTake part in rehabilitation sessions twice a week for eight weeks.\n\nUse spiral strapping during some sessions, depending on their group.\n\nComplete arm and hand assessments at the beginning and at the end of the study.\n\nThe results of this study may help develop simple and practical rehabilitation approaches that support children with cerebral palsy in becoming more independent in daily life.",[130,131,28,132],"Cerebral Palsy (CP)","Hand Grip Strength","Spasticity",[134,135,136,137,138,139],"cerebral palsy","upper extremity function","spasticity","hand grip strength","orthoses","hand skill","2026-02-16",{"date":142,"type":35},"2026-02-18",{"date":144,"type":21},"2026-02-15",{"date":146,"type":21},"2027-02-15",{"name":148,"class":42},"Abant Izzet Baysal University",{"id":150,"slug":151,"hasResults":11,"nctId":152,"briefTitle":153,"officialTitle":153,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":154,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":16,"minAge":52,"maxAge":155,"enrollmentInfo":156,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":158,"conditions":159,"keywords":161,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":163,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":164,"startDateStruct":166,"completionDateStruct":168,"leadSponsor":170,"locationsCount":4},"100608482","investigation-of-the-relationship-between-upper-extremity-function-in-string-instrument-performers-and-shoulder-proprioception-posture-hypermobility-and-performance-anxiety-100608482","NCT07202130","Investigation of The Relationship Between Upper Extremity Function in String Instrument Performers and Shoulder Proprioception, Posture, Hypermobility and Performance Anxiety","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Be aged between 18 and 50\n* Not play any musical instrument\n* Be a sedentary individual (individuals without regular exercise habits)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Being pregnant\n* Having undergone surgery involving the shoulder, arm, forearm or hand region within the last 6 months\n* Having any psychological diagnosis or regularly taking antidepressant medication\n* Having any chronic illness that could affect upper limb function","50 Years",{"count":157,"type":21},68,"Work-related musculoskeletal problems are seen in many professions, including musicians. Musculoskeletal problems related to playing are defined as any weakness, numbness, pain, tingling, or other symptoms that affect a musician's ability to play a musical instrument at their usual level. Given the high workload on the upper extremities, it is likely that neurological and musculoskeletal changes and\u002For dysfunctions are more common in musicians. Prolonged static activity and overuse of the trunk and proximal upper extremity muscles in musicians also frequently affect upper extremity function. Nerve compression syndromes affecting the median and ulnar nerves or thoracic outlet affect many musicians. Focal dystonias seen in musicians can affect the muscles that make up part or all of one hand. Studies evaluating musculoskeletal problems and upper extremity function in instrumentalists are limited in the literature. The aim of our study is to investigate the factors affecting upper extremity function in stringed instrument performers within a group of musicians, to compare them with a group that does not play any musical instrument, and to contribute the results to the literature. A total of 68 participants will be included in the study on a voluntary basis, comprising a stringed instrument performer group (n=34) and a control group not playing any musical instrument (n=34). Upper extremity function will be assessed using the Health Throw Test, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire and hand dynamometer, musculoskeletal system with the Nordic Musculoskeletal System Questionnaire, performance anxiety with the Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory, pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), hypermobility with the Beighton Scoring System for Hypermobility and the Upper Extremity Hypermobility Questionnaire, reaction time with the Nelson Hand Reaction Test, coordination using the Touching Discs Test, posture using the Apecs-AI Posture Assessment and Correction System® (Apecs) application, shoulder proprioception using a goniometer, upper extremity balance using the Y Balance Test, and shoulder girdle endurance and stabilisation using the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test.",[28,160],"Shoulder Proprioception",[162],"Hypermobility, Performance Anxiety, Shoulder Proprioception, Stringed Instrument Performer, Upper Extremity Function","2025-09-23",{"date":165,"type":35},"2025-10-01",{"date":167,"type":21},"2025-09-25",{"date":169,"type":21},"2026-02-05",{"name":171,"class":42},"Firat University"]