[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"upper-extremity-injury\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:upper-extremity-injury":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,49,79],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":14,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":23,"keywords":34,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":38,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":39,"startDateStruct":42,"completionDateStruct":44,"leadSponsor":46,"locationsCount":5},"100617117","procedural-sedation-and-analgesia-for-treatment-of-adults-with-fractures-and-dislocations-in-the-emergency-department-100617117",false,"NCT07314450","Procedural Sedation and Analgesia for Treatment of Adults With Fractures and Dislocations in the Emergency Department","PAINEX","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age ≥18.\n2. Patients with the following injuries are eligible:\n\n   1. Reduction treatment of shoulder dislocation\n   2. Reduction treatment of elbow dislocation\n   3. Reduction treatment of distal radius fractures, application of cast\n   4. Reduction treatment of finger fractures\u002Fdislocation\n   5. Casting treatment of upper extremity fractures\n\n      * Proximal humerus fracture, application of fixed sling\n      * Humeral shaft fracture, application of Sarmiento brace\n      * Supracondylar fracture, application of angled cast\n   6. Reduction treatment of hip dislocation\n   7. Reduction treatment of patella dislocation\n   8. Reduction of tibial shaft fracture, application of cast\n   9. Reduction treatment of ankle fractures including distal tibia fracture\n   10. Reduction treatment for toe fractures\u002Fdislocation\n   11. Casting treatment of lower extremity fractures\n\n       * Distal femur fracture, application of cast\u002Ftraction\n       * Proximal tibia fracture, application of cast or hinged brace\n       * Ankle fracture, application of walker\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Unable to give informed consent (e.g. unconscious, psychotic or dementia)\n2. Unwilling to participate in the study\n3. Prior inclusion in the study\n4. Already included in another clinical study at the same day\u002Fhospital visit\n5. Pregnant or breastfeeding","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},200,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different procedural sedation and analgesia methods used for adults with painful fractures requiring reduction treatment in the emergency department.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Which sedation and analgesia methods provide the best patient satisfaction and pain relief?\n* How do different treatment methods affect clinician satisfaction and the occurrence of adverse events?\n\nThe investigators will compare different types of procedural sedative and analgesic treatments (such as systemic sedation\u002Fanalgesia and regional techniques like nerve or hematoma blocks) to see which approach offers the best patient satisfaction and most effective pain control.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe adult patients with upper or lower extremity fractures or joint dislocations requiring painful reduction procedures.\n\nReceive one of the routinely used sedation or analgesia treatments (or no analgesia) during their emergency department care.\n\nReport their pain levels and satisfaction before, during, and after treatment. Be monitored for any side effects, complications, or use of antidotes. Data will be collected over a six-month period at Odense University Hospital, Holbæk Hospital, and Zealand University Hospital, Køge, following the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33],"Pain, Procedural","Analgesia","Extremity Injury","Patient Satisfaction","Satisfaction, Personal","Satisfaction","Upper Extremity Injury","Lower Extremity Fracture","Upper Extremity Fracture","Extremity Injuries Lower",[35,36],"Emergency Department","Procedural sedation and analgesia","RECRUITING","2025-12-17",{"date":40,"type":41},"2026-01-02","ACTUAL",{"date":43,"type":41},"2025-07-29",{"date":45,"type":20},"2026-07-01",{"name":47,"class":48},"Region Zealand","OTHER",{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":70,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":71,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":72,"startDateStruct":74,"completionDateStruct":75,"leadSponsor":77,"locationsCount":4},"100614376","survey-based-study-on-recovery-period-differences-in-upper-extremity-injuries-among-indoor-climbers-by-treatment-method-100614376","NCT07278791","Survey-Based Study on Recovery Period Differences in Upper Extremity Injuries Among Indoor Climbers by Treatment Method","A Survey-Based Study on Differences in Recovery Periods of Upper Extremity Injuries Among Indoor Climbers According to Treatment Methods","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18-50 years.\n* Individuals who have participated in indoor climbing within the past 12 months.\n* Individuals who have experienced an upper extremity injury (e.g., finger, wrist, elbow, shoulder; tendonitis, ligament injury, muscle tear) during indoor climbing within the past 12 months.\n* Individuals who received any form of treatment (self-care, physical therapy, injection, surgery, rehabilitation exercise) for the injury.\n* Individuals who can provide informed consent and complete an online questionnaire.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals who underwent major orthopedic surgery or fracture-related surgery unrelated to climbing.\n* Individuals who required hospitalization or long-term inpatient treatment (\\>3 months) due to severe musculoskeletal conditions.\n* Individuals currently receiving ongoing treatment for the same injury.\n* Individuals with neurological, systemic, or medical conditions that significantly affect musculoskeletal recovery.\n* Climbing coaches, professional climbers, or clinicians providing treatment (to avoid expert bias).","50 Years",{"count":58,"type":20},300,"This study aims to investigate the differences in recovery periods of upper extremity injuries among indoor climbers according to their treatment methods.\n\nThe research focuses on comparing the recovery duration, specifically the time to return to climbing, between those who received professional physical therapy and those who relied on self-treatment or other conservative management.\n\nAdditionally, this survey-based observational study seeks to explore how individual and training-related factors - such as warm-up duration, climbing frequency, and years of experience - affect the occurrence and recurrence of upper extremity injuries.\n\nParticipants will complete an online questionnaire consisting of demographic data, climbing habits, injury characteristics, treatment methods, and recovery outcomes.\n\nThe data will be collected anonymously and analyzed to determine whether the type of treatment correlates with faster recovery or reduced reinjury risk.\n\nThe findings are expected to provide foundational evidence for developing effective rehabilitation and injury-prevention strategies for indoor climbers, and to guide clinicians and trainers in selecting appropriate treatment approaches for upper extremity injuries.",[30],[62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69],"Indoor Climbing","Bouldering","Physical Therapy","Self-Treatment","Rehabilitation","Injury Recovery","Upper Limb","Sports Injury","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-12-01",{"date":73,"type":41},"2025-12-12",{"date":71,"type":20},{"date":76,"type":20},"2026-04-30",{"name":78,"class":48},"Sahmyook University",{"id":80,"slug":81,"hasResults":11,"nctId":82,"briefTitle":83,"officialTitle":84,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":85,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":86,"maxAge":87,"enrollmentInfo":88,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":90,"phases":91,"briefSummary":93,"conditions":94,"keywords":98,"overallStatus":70,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":104,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":105,"startDateStruct":107,"completionDateStruct":109,"leadSponsor":111,"locationsCount":4},"100584686","rehabilitation-paired-with-vns-for-motor-function-recovery-100584686","NCT06892574","Rehabilitation Paired with VNS for Motor Function Recovery","A Trial of Rehabilitation Paired with VNS for Motor Function Recovery in Post-ICH Patients (Recovery Study)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥22 years and \\\u003C80 years, all gender is acceptable.\n* History of unilateral supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage ≥ 6 months but \\\u003C 5 years.\n* Upper Extremity motor section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment score ≥20 and ≤50.\n* Right- or left-sided weakness of upper extremity.\n* Ability to communicate, understand, and give appropriate consent. Subjects can follow trial commands.\n* Subjects have good compliance and can complete the visits after surgery.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of ischemic stroke.\n* Cerebral hemorrhage resulting from tumors, trauma, aneurysms, or hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke.\n* Presence of ongoing dysphagia or aspiration difficulties.\n* Prior injury to vagus nerve, either bilateral or unilateral.\n* Subject receiving medication that may significantly interfere with actions of VNS on neurotransmitter systems at study entry, clinic rehabilitation follow-up timepoint, or home rehabilitation follow-up timepoint, such as centrally acting cholinoceptor blockers, centrally acting adrenoceptor blockers, norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors, etc.\n* Botox injections within 4 weeks prior to enrollment through the unmasking follow-up timepoint (Visit 6).\n* Severe spasticity of the upper extremity (Modified Ashworth ≥ 3).\n* Significant sensory loss of the upper extremity (Upper Extremity sensory section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment score \\\u003C 6).\n* Current requirement, or likely future requirement, of diathermy.\n* Current use of any other stimulation device, such as a pacemaker or other neurostimulator.\n* Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant or to breastfeed during the study period.\n* Participated in any other clinical trials within the preceding 3 months.\n* Not considered to be applicable by the investigator.","22 Years","79 Years",{"count":89,"type":20},10,"INTERVENTIONAL",[92],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with rehabilitation in improving upper extremity motor function after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).\n\nResearchers will evaluate the efficacy and safety of VNS by comparing the improvements of arm motor function post-ICH in the active VNS combined rehabilitation group with that in the sham VNS combined rehabilitation group (actual intensity 0 mA).\n\nParticipants in this study will undergo a surgical procedure to implant the VNS system and will subsequently recieve a 6 weeks in-clinic therapy, followed by an additional 6 weeks home exercise. During the final 6 weeks, participants will either recieve in-clinic therapy or maintain their home exercise, depending on their assigned group.",[95,96,30,66,97],"Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage","Motor Function","Vagus Nerve Stimulation",[99,100,101,97,102,103,66],"Stroke","Hemorrhagic Stroke","Upper Extremity Paresis","Neuromodulation","Randomized Controlled Trial","2025-03-23",{"date":106,"type":41},"2025-03-26",{"date":108,"type":20},"2025-04-01",{"date":110,"type":20},"2027-12-30",{"name":112,"class":48},"First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University"]