[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"validation\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:validation":22},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,36,65,94,124],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":16,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":19,"phases":4,"briefSummary":20,"conditions":21,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":23,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":24,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":25,"startDateStruct":28,"completionDateStruct":30,"leadSponsor":32,"locationsCount":35},"100568587","validity-and-feasibility-of-the-pregnancy-monitoring-belt---a-clinical-pilot-study-100568587",false,"NCT06683170","Validity and Feasibility of the Pregnancy Monitoring Belt - a Clinical Pilot Study","Inclusion criteria for pregnant women:\n\n* duration pf pregnancy at least 29+0 weeks\n* single pregnancy\n* age at least 18 years\n* ability to participate in Finnish No exclusion criteria\n\nInclusion criteria for healthcare professionals:\n\n* being a healthcare professional working with pregnant women\n* being able to participate in Finnish No exclusion criteria","FEMALE",{"count":17,"type":18},35,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The aims of this clinical pilot study are to:\n\n1. to validate the following parameters: mother heart rate, mother ECG, fetal heart rate, contractions, mother oxygen saturation, mother breathing rate, mother blood pressure\n2. to evaluate the feasibility on detecting fetal movements\n3. to explore how pregnant women and health care professionals perceive the acceptability and usability of the pregnancy monitoring system\n4. to explore the possibility to support prenatal attachment between parent and fetus with remote pregnancy monitoring\n\nThe participating pregnant women will wear the pregnancy monitoring belt for 2 hours during of which, the data will be collected with pregnancy monitoring belt and patient monitor (reference device). The data from the pregnancy monitoring belt will be compared with the patient monitor data referred as golden standard. The acceptability and usability will be assessed by pregnant women and healthcare professionals by fulfilling a questionnaire and participating in interviews. The data collection will be conducted in hospital environment.",[22],"Validation","RECRUITING","2026-06-17",{"date":26,"type":27},"2026-06-22","ACTUAL",{"date":29,"type":27},"2026-06-05",{"date":31,"type":18},"2026-09",{"name":33,"class":34},"Anna Axelin","OTHER",1,{"id":37,"slug":38,"hasResults":11,"nctId":39,"briefTitle":40,"officialTitle":41,"acronym":42,"eligibilityCriteria":43,"healthyVolunteers":44,"sex":45,"minAge":46,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":47,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":19,"phases":4,"briefSummary":49,"conditions":50,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":23,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":55,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":56,"startDateStruct":58,"completionDateStruct":60,"leadSponsor":62,"locationsCount":64},"100637518","aid-fog-artificial-intelligence-driven-freezing-of-gait-detection-in-the-home-100637518","NCT07580612","AID-FOG: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Freezing of Gait Detection in the Home","Artificial Intelligence-Driven Freezing Of Gait Detection in the Home: Investigating How Free-living Activities Affect the Algorithm","AID-FOG","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nFor all participants\n\n* Voluntary written informed consent of the participant has been obtained prior to any study-related procedures, except the non-recorded pre-screening questions;\n* At least 18 years of age at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF);\n* Person is cognitively able to follow and understand instructions and provide voluntary written informed consent;\n* Person is able to walk for short distances (± 10 meters) independently, with- or without use of a walking aid;\n* Person does not live in a temporary or permanent care facility.\n\nFor participants with PD:\n\n* Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) made by a neurologist according to the Movement Disorders Society guidelines;\n* Person self-reports to experience daily FOG (for recruitment of freezers only);\n* Person is willing to temporarily delay the morning anti-Parkinsonian medication during the standardized assessment visit.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* Occurrence of any of the following within 3 months prior to informed consent: myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, stroke, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRTD), active treatment for cancer or other malignant disease, uncontrolled congestive heart disease (NYHA class \\>3), acute psychosis or major psychiatric disorders or continued substance abuse, other neurological (than PD) or orthopaedic impairment that significantly impacts on gait;\n* Participant self-reports daily falls;\n* Participation in another interventional study, with or without an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device (IMD)",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":48,"type":18},126,"Freezing of gait (FOG) is a debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease increases the risk of falling. Despite being a common symptom, it is still difficult to evaluate freezing of gait quickly and accurately. Currently, the gold-standard method to determine the severity of FOG is a manual analysis of video footage by an experienced assessor, collected during standardized FOG-provoking walking tests. Because this is a very time-intensive process, where different assessors sometimes obtain different results, our team at KU Leuven have developed an artificial-intelligent (AI) algorithm trained to identify FOG episodes based on wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor data. The AI algorithm has already undergone initial validation during laboratory testing, yielding promising results. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the AI algorithm can accurately detect FOG episodes in a less controlled environment, namely the home environment. In a second phase, the investigators will also use the collected data to improve the AI algorithm for automated FOG detection in the home. Finally, the investigators want to explore whether the AI algorithm can detect FOG in real-time.",[51,52,22,53,54],"Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic","Freezing of Gait","Wearable Sensors","Artifical Intelligence","2026-05-05",{"date":57,"type":27},"2026-05-12",{"date":59,"type":27},"2025-09-22",{"date":61,"type":18},"2027-06",{"name":63,"class":34},"KU Leuven",3,{"id":66,"slug":67,"hasResults":11,"nctId":68,"briefTitle":69,"officialTitle":69,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":70,"healthyVolunteers":44,"sex":45,"minAge":46,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":71,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":19,"phases":4,"briefSummary":73,"conditions":74,"keywords":78,"overallStatus":83,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":84,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":85,"startDateStruct":87,"completionDateStruct":89,"leadSponsor":91,"locationsCount":4},"100632182","intercultural-adaptation-and-validation-of-the-ukrainian-quality-of-recovery-15-questionnaire-100632182","NCT07510360","Intercultural Adaptation and Validation of the Ukrainian Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire","Inclusion criteria\n\n1. Age 18 or older\n2. Patient scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general or regional anaesthesia\n3. Able to read and understand Ukrainian\n\nExclusion criteria\n\n1. Patient unable or unwilling to provide informed consent\n2. Any severe preexisting medical condition or cognitive impairment that limits objective assessment after operation\n3. Known substance use disorder associated with cognitive impairment\n\nWithdrawal criteria\n\n1\\. Presence of life-threatening post-operative complications",{"count":72,"type":18},200,"The Quality of Recovery 15-questionnaire (QoR-15) is used to assess postoperative quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia from the patient's perspective. It evaluates five dimensions including pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. The aim of this study is to validate a Ukrainian version of the QoR-15 scale (QoR-15Ukr) to measure postoperative recovery in Ukrainian-speaking patients.",[75,76,22,77],"Postoperative Recovery","General Anaesthesia","Questionnaire",[79,80,81,82],"postoperative recovery","validation","Ukrainian","QoR-15","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-03-30",{"date":86,"type":27},"2026-04-03",{"date":88,"type":18},"2026-05-01",{"date":90,"type":18},"2026-11-30",{"name":92,"class":93},"Rostyslav Voloshchuk","OTHER_GOV",{"id":95,"slug":96,"hasResults":11,"nctId":97,"briefTitle":98,"officialTitle":99,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":100,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":45,"minAge":46,"maxAge":101,"enrollmentInfo":102,"targetDuration":104,"studyType":19,"phases":4,"briefSummary":105,"conditions":106,"keywords":110,"overallStatus":83,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":115,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":116,"startDateStruct":118,"completionDateStruct":120,"leadSponsor":122,"locationsCount":4},"100605223","turkish-version-of-the-usefulness-satisfaction-and-ease-of-use-questionnaire-use-reliability-and-validity-100605223","NCT07159724","Turkish Version of the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE): Reliability and Validity","Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE) in Individuals With Back and Neck Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Presence of back or neck pain lasting at least 3 months\n2. Use of a supportive biomedical device in a rehabilitation program\n3. Literacy\n4. Age between 18 and 65\n5. Willingness to participate in the study on a voluntary basis\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Malignant condition 2. Pregnancy 3. Loss of function due to neurological or systemic disease 4. Having undergone surgery in the last 6 months 5. Acute infection 6. Unhealed fracture 7. Withdrawal from any phase of the study 8. Light sensitivity","65 Years",{"count":103,"type":18},220,"3 Days","In recent years, numerous technological products and devices have been developed in rehabilitation through advances in biomedical technology. These innovations support traditional rehabilitation services, offering more effective treatment methods and improving patients' adherence and participation. Increased compliance in treatment positively influences functional status, quality of life, and satisfaction. However, the diversity of biomedical products and the varying strength of their scientific foundations make it critical to evaluate them in terms of benefit, patient compliance, and usability. In physiotherapy and rehabilitation, objective tools for this purpose remain limited, which hinders accurate assessment of product effectiveness and the identification of improvements. Uncertainty regarding usability and ease of use may also result in inefficient utilization of resources.\n\nQuestionnaires provide cost-effective tools to capture users' opinions, reflecting strengths and weaknesses of a product without the need for measurement devices. The Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) Questionnaire, developed by Arnold Lund in 2001, is a comprehensive 30-item scale scored on a 7-point Likert system. It evaluates usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction, with items applicable across different products and services such as software, hardware, applications, or user support materials. Its multidimensional structure allows for the evaluation of usability in physiotherapy and rehabilitation technologies as well as in broader fields including robotics, social networking sites, diagnostic tools, and virtual reality.\n\nDespite its wide use internationally, no validated Turkish version of the USE Questionnaire exists. Establishing a culturally adapted, valid, and reliable Turkish version will address this gap and provide clinicians and researchers with a standardized tool for usability assessment.\n\nThe aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the USE Questionnaire.",[107,108,109,22],"Neck Pain","Low Back Pain","Biomedical Technology",[111,112,113,114],"Musculoskeletal Pain","validaiton","medical device","evaluation","2025-08-29",{"date":117,"type":27},"2025-09-08",{"date":119,"type":18},"2025-08-26",{"date":121,"type":18},"2025-09-30",{"name":123,"class":34},"Hacettepe University",{"id":125,"slug":126,"hasResults":11,"nctId":127,"briefTitle":128,"officialTitle":128,"acronym":129,"eligibilityCriteria":130,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":45,"minAge":46,"maxAge":131,"enrollmentInfo":132,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":19,"phases":4,"briefSummary":134,"conditions":135,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":23,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":138,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":139,"startDateStruct":141,"completionDateStruct":143,"leadSponsor":145,"locationsCount":35},"100506209","validation-of-visual-analog-scales-to-measure-satisfaction-and-well-being-at-work-sowell-vas-100506209","NCT05871411","Validation of Visual Analog Scales to Measure SatisfactiOn and WELL-being at Work (SoWell-VAS)","SoWell-VAS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* All voluntary adults with a professional activity.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Minor\n* Person not volunteer to participate.\n* Protected adults (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice)","80 Years",{"count":133,"type":18},120,"We spend a third of our life at work. Psychosocial risks (PSR) are a major issue in occupational health 1. Approaching the different dimensions of PSR calls on a dozen essential components: workload, autonomy, social support, burnout, anxiety, efforts made, rewards, work addiction, investment, etc. a specific questionnaire which usually contains 20 to 30 questions, so that having an overall view of PSR using the current reference questionnaires (Karasek, Siegrist, etc.) represents a total of more than 300 questions. The response time is thus incompatible with current medical practice (passage in the waiting room before the occupational health medical examination) and leads to a majority of non-responses during anonymous questionnaires on the Internet. On the other hand, these validated questionnaires were carried out by different people and are very heterogeneous between them, including in their formulation, so that the respondents have the impression of disorganization and anarchy. There is therefore a need for short, quick and uniform questionnaires. EVAs offer the incredible advantage of meeting these criteria: speed, uniformity, precision. From a data analysis point of view, EVAs also have the advantage of offering a continuous quantitative response, allowing the use of all statistical approaches. If some questionnaires have already been validated in the form of EVA, such as the EVA stress versus the \" Perceived Stress Scale \" questionnaire (PSS), the EVA workload and EVA autonomy at work versus the Karasek questionnaire, the other reference questionnaires are not yet validated in EVA (burnout, anxiety, efforts \u002F rewards, work addiction, etc.).",[22,136,137],"Visual Analogue Scale","Occupational Stress","2024-08-05",{"date":140,"type":27},"2024-08-06",{"date":142,"type":27},"2023-06-13",{"date":144,"type":18},"2026-06",{"name":146,"class":34},"University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand"]