[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"video-laryngoscope\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:video-laryngoscope":31},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,52,80,107,133],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":20,"enrollmentInfo":21,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":25,"briefSummary":27,"conditions":28,"keywords":33,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":40,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":41,"startDateStruct":44,"completionDateStruct":46,"leadSponsor":48,"locationsCount":51},"100619946","pediatric-airway-noninferiority-trial-of-devices-for-intubation-assessment-100619946",false,"NCT07351227","Pediatric Airway: Noninferiority Trial of Devices for Intubation Assessment","Comparison of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of McGRATH™ MAC and Besdata Videolaryngoscopes in the Orotracheal Intubation of Children: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial","PANDA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* The study will include children aged between 6 months and 3 years who are scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia at the Children's Institute (Instituto da Criança - ICr) of the Hospital das Clínicas Complex, University of São Paulo Medical School (HC-FMUSP), provided that informed consent is obtained from their parents or legal guardians.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under one year of age will be excluded if informed consent is not obtained from their legal guardians, if they are classified as ASA physical status IV or higher, present with hemodynamic instability, or have craniofacial abnormalities or oral deformities suggestive of a potentially difficult airway.",true,"ALL","6 Months","3 Years",{"count":22,"type":23},226,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[26],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether the BESDATA BD-DF videolaryngoscope works as well as the McGRATH™ MAC videolaryngoscope for placing a breathing tube in infants during surgery. The study will also compare the costs associated with using each device.\n\nThe main questions this study aims to answer are:\n\nIs the BESDATA BD-DF videolaryngoscope as effective as the McGRATH™ MAC videolaryngoscope for successful placement of a breathing tube on the first attempt in infants?\n\nAre there differences between the two devices in terms of procedure time, number of attempts, airway-related complications, and overall costs?\n\nResearchers will compare infants who are intubated using the BESDATA BD-DF videolaryngoscope with infants who are intubated using the McGRATH™ MAC videolaryngoscope to see whether the two devices perform similarly and whether one is more cost-effective than the other.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe randomly assigned to have a breathing tube placed using one of the two videolaryngoscopes;\n\nReceive standard general anesthesia for an elective surgical procedure;\n\nHave information collected during and after the procedure to assess safety, effectiveness, and costs.",[29,30,31,32],"Intubation, Intratracheal","Airway Management","Video Laryngoscope","Cost Effectiveness",[34,35,36,37,38],"Videolaryngoscope","Pediatric orotracheal intubation","Cost effectiveness","McGrath MAC","BESDATA","RECRUITING","2026-03-18",{"date":42,"type":43},"2026-03-20","ACTUAL",{"date":45,"type":43},"2026-03-01",{"date":47,"type":23},"2027-12-31",{"name":49,"class":50},"University of Sao Paulo General Hospital","OTHER",1,{"id":53,"slug":54,"hasResults":11,"nctId":55,"briefTitle":56,"officialTitle":57,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":58,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":59,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":61,"briefSummary":62,"conditions":63,"keywords":67,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":71,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":72,"startDateStruct":74,"completionDateStruct":76,"leadSponsor":78,"locationsCount":51},"100629137","comparative-study-between-combined-video-laryngoscope-and-video-stylet-intubation-versus-combined-video-laryngoscope-and-fiberoptic-intubation-in-a-simulated-difficult-airway-100629137","NCT07470736","Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway","Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* the anaesthesiology medical officers who have at least more than two years of experience.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Thsoe who has severe hand tremors.",{"count":60,"type":23},75,[26],"This study titled \"Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fibreoptic Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway\" aims to evaluate and compare two advanced intubation techniques used in managing difficult airways. Currently, there is no study in Malaysia that compares the combination of a video laryngoscope (VL) with a video stylet (VS) and the combination of VL with a fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB). Although both methods have been investigated separately, direct comparisons in simulated difficult airway settings are limited. The findings of this study will help guide airway management protocols and improve clinical outcomes in challenging airway situations.\n\nThis is a single-centre, randomized comparative crossover trial conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, HCTM, UKM. Ethical approval will be obtained from the departmental and university ethics committees prior to commencement. The study population will consist of anaesthesiology medical officers with at least two years of experience and anaesthesiology trainees in their second to fourth year of training at HCTM, UKM. Participants with severe hand tremors or those who decline participation will be excluded.\n\nThe main objectives are to compare the first-pass intubation success rate, time to successful intubation, and operator-rated ease of intubation between the two combined techniques. Each participant will perform both VL with VS and VL with FOB intubations in a simulated difficult airway scenario. The study hypothesizes that the combined VL with VS technique will provide superior performance, a higher first-pass success rate, shorter intubation time, and greater ease of use compared to the VL with FOB technique.\n\nParticipants who fail to complete all procedures or withdraw after participation will be considered dropouts. The results from this study are expected to provide useful insights into the effectiveness and practicality of these two combination techniques for airway management training and clinical application.",[31,64,65,66],"Airway","Difficult Airway","Fiberoptic Guided Intubation",[68,69,70,64],"Video laryngoscope","Video sylet intubation","Simulated difficult airway","2026-03-13",{"date":73,"type":43},"2026-03-17",{"date":75,"type":43},"2026-02-26",{"date":77,"type":23},"2028-03-14",{"name":79,"class":50},"National University of Malaysia",{"id":81,"slug":82,"hasResults":11,"nctId":83,"briefTitle":84,"officialTitle":84,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":85,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":86,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":87,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":89,"briefSummary":90,"conditions":91,"keywords":93,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":98,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":99,"startDateStruct":101,"completionDateStruct":103,"leadSponsor":105,"locationsCount":51},"100474270","tracheal-tube-cuff-inflation-deflation-method-for-video-assisted-laryngoscope-nasal-intubation-in-adults-100474270","NCT05455723","Tracheal Tube Cuff Inflation-Deflation Method for Video Assisted Laryngoscope Nasal Intubation in Adults","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III\n* Scheduled for elective surgery (dental and maxillofacial) in need for nasal intubation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients, who have coagulopathies,\n* Have upper airway abnormalities,\n* At risk for aspiration or by reasons of\n* Parent's refusal will be excluded from the study","21 Years",{"count":88,"type":23},90,[26],"The goal of this clinical trial is to compare cuff inflation deflation method versus conventional method using Magill forceps in adult patients scheduled for elective surgery dental or maxillofacial that need nasal intubation. The study question:\n\nIs cuff inflation deflation method for nasal intubation takes a short time than the conventional method using Magill forceps in adult patients scheduled for elective surgery dental or maxillofacial?\n\nWe will compare the inflation deflation technique with the Magill forceps technique for nasal intubation in adult patients to see if the inflation deflation technique will take less time and associated with less side effects like cuff perforation and mucosal injury.\n\nParticipants will \\[describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do, interventions they'll be given and use bullets if it is more than 2 items\\].",[30,92,31],"Nasal Intubation",[94,95,96,97],"Magill forceps","Inflation-deflation technique","Video-assisted Laryngoscope","Nasal intubation","2025-01-28",{"date":100,"type":43},"2025-01-31",{"date":102,"type":43},"2024-01-19",{"date":104,"type":23},"2025-03-31",{"name":106,"class":50},"Suez Canal University",{"id":108,"slug":109,"hasResults":11,"nctId":110,"briefTitle":111,"officialTitle":112,"acronym":113,"eligibilityCriteria":114,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":115,"maxAge":116,"enrollmentInfo":117,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":119,"briefSummary":120,"conditions":121,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":124,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":125,"startDateStruct":127,"completionDateStruct":129,"leadSponsor":131,"locationsCount":51},"100574419","c-mac-blade-d-video-vs-macintosh-laryngoscope-for-double-lumen-tube-insertion-100574419","NCT06759038","C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion","Comparison Between C-MAC Blade D Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracic Surgeries","DLT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Mallampati 1 and 2.\n* ASA 1 and 2.\n* Patients who will be prepared for elective thoracic surgeries under general anesthesia.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant Patients.\n* Patients with anticipated difficult airway.\n* Patients with limited neck extension.\n* Thyromental distance less than 6.5cm.\n* BMI greater than 35. (Weight in kilogram (kg) divided by height in meters squared)\n* Patients at a risk of aspiration.\n* Failure to intubate the patient after 3 attempts.","18 Years","60 Years",{"count":118,"type":23},60,[26],"The goal of this clinical trial is to know which type of laryngoscope is better for Double Lumen Tube (DLT) insertion, in participants undergoing elective thoracic surgeries.\n\nThe main question aim to answer is Is C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope better than Macintosh laryngoscope for DLT insertion in term of time taking for intubation and hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy? Researchers are comparing two groups of participants\n\n* Participants in Group A are receiving intubation from C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope.\n* Participants in Group B are receiving intubations from Macintosh laryngoscope.",[31,122,123],"Double Lumen Tube Intubation","Elective Thoracic Surgery","2024-12-27",{"date":126,"type":43},"2025-01-06",{"date":128,"type":43},"2024-12-03",{"date":130,"type":23},"2025-03",{"name":132,"class":50},"Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institue of Trauma",{"id":134,"slug":135,"hasResults":11,"nctId":136,"briefTitle":137,"officialTitle":138,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":139,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":140,"minAge":115,"maxAge":141,"enrollmentInfo":142,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":144,"briefSummary":145,"conditions":146,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":151,"startDateStruct":153,"completionDateStruct":155,"leadSponsor":157,"locationsCount":159},"100510521","comparison-of-airtraq-in-class-2-3-obese-and-nonobese-men-during-intubation-a-prospective-randomized-clinical-study-100510521","NCT05927519","Comparison of Airtraq in Class 2-3 Obese and Nonobese Men During Intubation: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study","Airtraq in Obese and Nonobese Men","Inclusion Criteria:\\> 18 age men gender elective operation requring intuabtion -\n\nExclusion Criteria:\\\u003C18 age women emergency operation\n\n\\-","MALE","80 Years",{"count":143,"type":23},80,[26],"Morbid obesity is a growing disease. Intubations of these patients mostly difficult. Video laryngoscopes have to be used during the intubation of these patients. The intubation of men is more complicated and difficult than obese women. There were no trials compared to the new video laryngoscopes in morbidly obese men. Patients will be divided into two groups; non-obese and klas 2-3 obese. Airtraq will be used for their intubation. The time for intubation will be the primary aim of this prospective randomized study. The insertion time, perioperative hemodynamic variables, and postoperative complications will also be recorded.",[147,148,31,149],"Obesity, Morbid","Intubation; Difficult or Failed","Men","2024-10-24",{"date":152,"type":43},"2024-10-28",{"date":154,"type":43},"2024-10-25",{"date":156,"type":23},"2027-10-05",{"name":158,"class":50},"Kocaeli University",2]