[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"videolaryngoscopy\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:videolaryngoscopy":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,52,83,116,145],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":40,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":41,"startDateStruct":44,"completionDateStruct":46,"leadSponsor":48,"locationsCount":51},"100631035","video-versus-direct-laryngoscopy-for-tracheal-intubation-in-pediatric-surgery-100631035",false,"NCT07495436","Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Pediatric Surgery","Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Pediatric Surgery: The VIDEOKIDS Pragmatic Multicentre Randomized Trial","VIDEOKIDS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Paediatric patients (age 0-16 years),\n* Undergoing elective or scheduled surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation,\n* Planned tracheal intubation using either videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique,\n* Informed or general consent given, according to the relevant ethics committee statement,.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known upper airway anatomical abnormalities or clinical conditions requiring a specific intubation technique (e.g., fibreoptic intubation),\n* Requirement for emergent tracheal intubation that does not allow adequate randomisation,\n* Refusal of parents or legal guardians to participate in the study.","ALL","0 Days","16 Hours",{"count":21,"type":22},5562,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Tracheal intubation in paediatric patients is a high-risk procedure in which failure to achieve successful intubation on the first attempt is associated with an increased risk of complications, including hypoxaemia and airway trauma. Videolaryngoscopes have been increasingly adopted in clinical practice because they improve glottic visualisation; however, evidence of their benefit in paediatric patients remains inconsistent.\n\nThe VIDEOKIDS trial is a large, pragmatic, international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial designed to compare videolaryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The primary objective is to determine whether videolaryngoscopy increases the rate of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with direct laryngoscopy.",[28,29,30,31],"Tracheal Intubation","Videolaryngoscopy","General Anesthesia","Difficult Airway Intubation",[33,34,35,36,37,38],"tracheal intubation","videolaryngoscopy","laryngoscopy","Paediatric airway","Airway management","Randomised controlled trial","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-17",{"date":42,"type":43},"2026-04-22","ACTUAL",{"date":45,"type":22},"2026-05-01",{"date":47,"type":22},"2027-12-30",{"name":49,"class":50},"Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago","OTHER",1,{"id":53,"slug":54,"hasResults":11,"nctId":55,"briefTitle":56,"officialTitle":57,"acronym":58,"eligibilityCriteria":59,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":60,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":61,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":63,"briefSummary":64,"conditions":65,"keywords":70,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":74,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":75,"startDateStruct":77,"completionDateStruct":78,"leadSponsor":80,"locationsCount":51},"100630220","comparison-of-awake-tracheal-intubation-methods-100630220","NCT07484841","Comparison of Awake Tracheal Intubation Methods","A Comparison of Three Difficult Intubation Techniques in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group Clinical Trial","ATI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients aged 18 and older\n* Patients classified as ASA I-II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification\n* Patients scheduled for elective surgery\n* Patients expected to require difficult mask ventilation, difficult laryngoscopy, or difficult tracheal intubation; patients expected to have short apnea periods (Planjuan goiter); patients at risk of aspiration; patients expected to require difficult rescue techniques; and patients with a reported history of difficult intubation\n* Patients scheduled for intubation using the awake tracheal intubation (ATI) method\n* Individuals who have agreed to participate in the study by signing an informed consent form\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a mouth opening \\\u003C1.5 cm\n* Patients requiring emergency intubation or emergency surgery (situations where there is insufficient time to administer ATI)\n* Patients who cannot cooperate (mental incapacity, impaired consciousness, inability to communicate, etc.)\n* Patients with known allergies to lidocaine or other local\u002Ftopical anesthetic agents used\n* Pregnancy\n* Patients with a history of severe cardiac arrhythmia or hemodynamic instability (due to increased risk during intubation)\n* Patients who have previously undergone tracheostomy or whose airway is technically obstructed due to anatomical deformity\n* Patients who refuse to participate in the study or who do not provide informed consent","18 Years",{"count":62,"type":22},201,[25],"The aim of this study was to compare three different awake tracheal intubation technique\n\n-fiberoptic bronchoscopy (ATI:FB), videolaryngoscopy (ATI:VL), and fiberoptic bronchoscopy via a supraglottic airway device (ATI:SAD)- in terms of success rates, intubation times, and complications. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the reliability of the SAD-assisted ATI method and its potential to contribute to the literature.",[66,67,68,29,69],"Airway Management Assessment","Awake Endotracheal Intubation","Awake Fiberoptic Nasal Intubation","Supraglottic Airway Device Insertion",[34,71,72,73],"awake tracheal intubation","fiberoptic bronchoscopy","aintree catheter","2026-03-18",{"date":76,"type":43},"2026-03-20",{"date":76,"type":22},{"date":79,"type":22},"2028-06-20",{"name":81,"class":82},"Kocaeli City Hospital","OTHER_GOV",{"id":84,"slug":85,"hasResults":11,"nctId":86,"briefTitle":87,"officialTitle":88,"acronym":89,"eligibilityCriteria":90,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":91,"maxAge":60,"enrollmentInfo":92,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":94,"phases":4,"briefSummary":95,"conditions":96,"keywords":100,"overallStatus":106,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":107,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":108,"startDateStruct":110,"completionDateStruct":112,"leadSponsor":114,"locationsCount":51},"100611817","comparison-of-vidiac-pediac-and-intubation-difficulty-scale-in-pediatric-patients-undergoing-videolaryngoscopic-intubation-100611817","NCT07245511","Comparison of VIDIAC, PeDiAC and Intubation Difficulty Scale in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Videolaryngoscopic Intubation","A Prospective Observational Study Comparing the VIDIAC, PeDiAC, and Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in Pediatric Patients Aged 5-18 Years Undergoing Tracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy","VIDIPEDIDS","Eligible participants will be pediatric patients aged 5 to 18 years who are undergoing general anesthesia for any surgical procedure. All included patients must undergo tracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope (C-MAC). Patients must have an ASA physical status classification of I to IV and written informed consent must be obtained from a parent or legal guardian prior to participation.\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pediatric patients between 5 and 18 years of age\n* Undergoing general anesthesia for any type of surgical procedure\n* ASA physical status classification I to IV\n* Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing awake fiberoptic intubation\n* History of tracheal resection or reconstruction surgery\n* Refusal to participate or absence of informed consent","5 Years",{"count":93,"type":22},450,"OBSERVATIONAL","This prospective observational study aims to evaluate three scoring systems (VIDIAC (Video Laryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification), PeDiAC (Pediatric Difficult Airway Classification), and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)).\n\nA total of 450 children undergoing general anesthesia with videolaryngoscopic intubation will be included in the study. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, and glottic imaging, as well as detailed intubation-related variables such as total intubation time, number of attempts, complications, and subjective intubation ease scores will be recorded.",[29,97,98,31,99],"Intubation Difficulty Scale","Vidiac Score","Pediatric Anesthesia",[101,102,103,104,34,105],"intubation difficulty scale (IDS)","VIDIAC","PeDiAC","Pediatric anesthesia","airway management","RECRUITING","2025-11-17",{"date":109,"type":43},"2025-11-24",{"date":111,"type":43},"2025-10-16",{"date":113,"type":22},"2026-04-15",{"name":115,"class":50},"Ankara City Hospital Bilkent",{"id":117,"slug":118,"hasResults":11,"nctId":119,"briefTitle":120,"officialTitle":121,"acronym":122,"eligibilityCriteria":123,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":60,"maxAge":124,"enrollmentInfo":125,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":127,"briefSummary":128,"conditions":129,"keywords":134,"overallStatus":106,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":136,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":137,"startDateStruct":139,"completionDateStruct":141,"leadSponsor":143,"locationsCount":144},"100540889","hyperangulated-vs-macintosh-blades-for-intubation-with-videolaryngoscopy-in-icu-100540889","NCT06322719","Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU","A Randomized Comparison Between the Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Blades for First-attempt Intubation Success With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU Patients.","INVIBLADE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older.\n* Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit.\n* Need for tracheal intubation during the stay in the ICU.\n* The device to be used for intubation is a videolaryngoscope\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnancy or lactation.\n* Emergent tracheal intubation that does not allow for the randomization of the procedure.\n* Need for tracheal intubation with a device other than the videolaryngoscope (fiberoptic bronchoscope, direct laryngoscopy, tracheostomy, etc.).\n* Tracheal intubation performed outside the ICU (Emergency Department, Hospital ward, etc.).","90 Years",{"count":126,"type":22},1036,[25],"Tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with high incidence of difficult intubation and complications. Videolaryngoscopes (VLs) devices have been proposed to improve airway management, and the use of VLs are recommended as first-line or after a first-attempt failure using direct laryngoscopy in ICU airway management algorithms. Although until relatively few years ago there were doubts about whether videolaryngoscopes had advantages over direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in critically ill patients, two recent studies (DEVICE (1), INTUBATE (2)), and a Cochrane review (3) have confirmed that videolaryn should be used?, and what is the best blade? . There are two types of blades commonly used with videolaryngoscopes: the \"Macintosh\" blade with a slight curvature, and hyperangulated blades. The \"Macintosh\" blades have a lower angle of vision, but they have the advantage of being similar to the blades commonly used in direct laryngoscopy, making them easy to use for the person performing the ETI. Hyperangulated blades have a greater angle of vision, improving glottic visualization, especially in patients with an anterior glottis. However, the need to overcome this angulation could potentially hinder the passage of the endotracheal tube to the vocal cords. It is unknown if either blade has any advantage for intubating critically ill patients.",[130,131,132,29,133],"Acute Respiratory Failure","Intubation","Intubation; Difficult or Failed","Intubation Complication",[34,33,135],"complication","2025-09-09",{"date":138,"type":43},"2025-09-15",{"date":140,"type":43},"2024-05-01",{"date":142,"type":22},"2026-06-01",{"name":49,"class":50},29,{"id":146,"slug":147,"hasResults":11,"nctId":148,"briefTitle":149,"officialTitle":150,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":151,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":60,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":152,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":94,"phases":4,"briefSummary":154,"conditions":155,"keywords":159,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":166,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":167,"startDateStruct":169,"completionDateStruct":171,"leadSponsor":173,"locationsCount":51},"100597393","comparison-of-intubation-using-video-laryngeal-mask-and-video-laryngoscope-in-elective-surgical-patients-100597393","NCT07057908","Comparison of Intubation Using Video Laryngeal Mask and Video Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients","A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Tracheal Intubation Via Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Video Laryngoscope in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients aged 18 years and older\n* Patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures\n* Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I-III\n* Patients undergoing general anesthesia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 18 years\n* Patients undergoing emergency surgery\n* Patients with difficult airway predictors, such as:\n\nMallampati score ≥ 3\n\nThyromental distance \\\u003C 6 cm\n\nMouth opening \\\u003C 3 cm\n\n* Patients with anatomical abnormalities or surgical history involving the oropharynx, larynx, or airway\n* Patients with conditions contraindicating head or neck manipulation (e.g., cervical instability, upper airway tumors)\n\nPregnant patients",{"count":153,"type":22},176,"This study compares two airway devices that are commonly used during elective surgery: the video laryngeal mask airway (VLM) and the video laryngoscope (VLS). Both are part of routine anesthesia practice. Our main focus is to measure how long intubation takes with each device and to see how successful the intubation is. The study does not involve any extra procedures or risks; everything will be carried out as part of normal patient care.",[156,28,157,29,158],"Airway Management","Elective Surgeries","Anaesthesia",[160,161,162,163,164,165],"Video Laryngoscope","Video Laryngeal Mask Airway","SaCoVLM","Intubation Success Rate","Observational Study","Elective Surgical Patients","2025-08-28",{"date":168,"type":43},"2025-09-05",{"date":170,"type":22},"2025-09-01",{"date":172,"type":22},"2026-03-02",{"name":174,"class":50},"Samsun University"]