[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"wrist-disarticulation\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:wrist-disarticulation":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,46],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":5},"100617983","evaluation-of-the-phantom-x-implantable-emg-sensor-system-for-myoelectric-prosthesis-control-100617983",false,"NCT07325708","Evaluation of the Phantom X Implantable EMG Sensor System for Myoelectric Prosthesis Control","Clinical Evaluation of System for Bionic Arm Gesture Control (CYBORG)","CYBORG","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patient has a unilateral upper-limb difference (congenital or acquired) at the transradial or wrist level.\n2. The patient currently uses a myoelectric prosthesis or is deemed a suitable candidate for fitting with a myoelectric prosthesis.\n3. Patient is a suitable candidate for the implantation of the Phantom X sensor array as assessed by the implanting physician.\n4. Patient is at least 18 years old and can provide written informed consent.\n5. Patient is willing to comply with study protocol and make required study visits.\n6. Patient received amputation ≥ 12 months prior to consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patient has a significant cognitive deficit resulting in inability to follow study directions.\n2. Patient has a neuro-muscular deficit and is unable to initiate substantial muscle contraction in the residual limb as determined by the implanting physician or investigator.\n3. Patient has another medical condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may cause him\u002Fher to be non-compliant with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy insufficient to allow for the completion of study procedures and follow-up.\n4. The patient has a planned medical procedure (e.g., surgery) during the study period that could interfere with compliance with study visits or assessments.\n5. Patient has an allergy to anesthesia or other medication used for sedation in the study.\n6. Patient has an active implantable device (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, neuromodulation device) that can potentially interfere with the performance of Phantom X system.\n7. Patient may require an MRI during the study duration.\n8. Implantation of the device poses a health risk to the patient as determined by the implanting physician.\n9. Women who are breastfeeding, currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the study or have a positive urine pregnancy test at screening.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},10,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The CYBORG Study is a first-in-human clinical investigation evaluating the safety and performance of the Phantom X System, an implantable electromyography (EMG) sensor array designed to provide control of upper-limb prostheses. The study will assess surgical feasibility, device function, signal quality, and the system's ability to support intuitive prosthetic control during functional tasks. Participants will undergo implantation of the Phantom X sensors and complete a series of in-clinic visits to assess functional performance of the Phantom X system. Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected at various timepoints.",[27,28,29],"Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury)","Wrist Disarticulation","Transradial Amputation",[31,32,33],"Upper limb amputation","Prosthesis","Myoelectric","RECRUITING","2026-06-21",{"date":37,"type":38},"2026-06-24","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":38},"2026-04-17",{"date":42,"type":21},"2027-06",{"name":44,"class":45},"Phantom Neuro Inc.","INDUSTRY",{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":52,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":55,"phases":4,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":58,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":63,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":64,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":73},"100568707","comparison-of-standard-myoelectric-hand-and-bionic-hand-use-in-individuals-with-upper-limb-amputation-100568707","NCT06684730","Comparison of Standard Myoelectric Hand and Bionic Hand Use in Individuals With Upper Limb Amputation","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Having a transradial amputation or wrist disarticulation due to acquired or congenital causes,\n* Using a standard myoelectric or bionic hand prosthesis for at least 6 months,\n* Being between the ages of 18 and 65,\n* Having no neurological or cognitive disorders, rheumatic diseases, or other upper extremity dysfunction that could affect test results, and\n* Having signed an informed consent form indicating the patient's willingness to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals younger than 18 or older than 65,\n* Those with additional musculoskeletal or neurological conditions preventing them from completing the tests and scales,\n* Those with psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments preventing them from completing the questionnaire and assessment scales,\n* Those with stump or upper extremity conditions preventing them from using their prosthesis.","65 Years",{"count":54,"type":21},22,"OBSERVATIONAL","This single-center, prospective, comparative study aims to compare hand function, quality of life, patient satisfaction, task completion time, fatigue, and compensatory elbow, shoulder, and cervical movements in individuals with transradial amputation or wrist disarticulation who use either standard myoelectric or bionic hand prostheses. The primary research questions are:\n\n1. Are there differences in patient satisfaction, quality of life, and hand function between individuals using standard myoelectric and bionic hand prostheses?\n2. Do individuals using standard myoelectric and bionic hand prostheses exhibit different kinematics in terms of compensatory shoulder, elbow, and neck movements? Could bionic hand prostheses with their diverse grasping capabilities lead to fewer compensatory movements compared to standard myoelectric hand prostheses?\n3. Can fatigue induced by performing specific activities of daily living alter hand function and upper extremity-neck kinematics in individuals using either standard myoelectric or bionic hand prostheses?\n4. Can cognitive and physical fatigue following activities of daily living lead to different levels of changes in hand function and upper extremity-neck kinematics in individuals using standard myoelectric and bionic hand prostheses?",[29,28],[59,29,60,61,62],"Standard Myoelectric Hand","Bionic Hand","Wrist disarticulation","Amputation of upper limb","2026-02-13",{"date":65,"type":38},"2026-02-17",{"date":67,"type":38},"2024-11-27",{"date":69,"type":21},"2026-04-29",{"name":71,"class":72},"Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital","OTHER",1]