A Comparison Between Biportal and Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

ConditionLumbar Disc Herniation

Trial statusNot yet recruiting

Trial phaseNot applicable

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

Age18-70

SponsorSohag University

About this trial

This study aims to provide a detailed comparison between different methods of lumbar discectomy by the use of different types of spine endoscopy to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each type

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

All patients should fulfill the following criteria

Patients aged 18-70 years.

single-level lumbar disc herniation (L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1) confirmed by MRI.

Persistent symptoms not responding to conservative management (≥6 weeks).

Disqualifiers

All patients should not have any of the following criteria

Multilevel disc herniation.

Previous lumbar spine surgery, trauma or injection.

Severe spinal stenosis.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

Endoscopic lumbar discectomy
Procedure/Surgery
Uniportal and boportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (transforaminal or interlaminar)

Treatment groups

60 Participants

are divided into 1 treatment group

Group A: Patients with lumbar disc prolapseActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

Primary outcome measures After endoscopic lumbar discectomy Pain relief

1-Pain Relief: Visual Analog Scale (VAS for leg and back pain)

Time frame

12 weeks up to 2 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Sohag University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: