Clinical trials

This phase II trial compares the effect of intensity-modulated post-operative radiation therapy (I²-PORT) followed by standard of care therapy (chemotherapy or immunotherapy) to standard of care therapy alone in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have remaining lymph node cancer after surgery. Radiation therapy uses high-energy X-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a type of 3-dimensional radiation therapy that uses computer-generated images to show the size and shape of the tumor. Thin beams of radiation of different intensities are aimed at the tumor from many angles. This type of radiation therapy reduces the damage to healthy tissue near the tumor. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy may induce changes in the body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Adding I²-PORT radiation therapy to standard therapy may be more effective than standard therapy alone in reducing the risk of cancer returning in those who have undergone surgery for NSCLC.

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed at comparing different radiotherapy fractionation regimens combined with sequential dual immunotherapy versus traditional chemoradiotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). A total of 342 pMMR/MSS LARC patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to short-course radiotherapy (5×5Gy) followed by sequential dual immunotherapy (paromlimab + tuvonralimab + CAPEOX), long-course radiotherapy followed by sequential dual immunotherapy, or conventional long-course chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the complete response rate (pCR + cCR). Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients adopting the "watch-and-wait" strategy, disease-free survival, overall survival, and safety. This study innovatively explores the synergistic mechanism of different radiotherapy fractionations with dual immunotherapy, optimizes the timing of immunotherapy initiation, and constructs a clinical-imaging-pathology multimodal efficacy prediction model, aiming to advance LARC treatment from empirical to precision therapy while achieving organ and function preservation.

This project aims to organise the sampling of blood and tumor at key points of the standard of care of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). This will allow to identify new potential predictive biomarkers of efficacy of immunotherapy and to investigate the evolution of the tumoral microenvironment after successive systemic treatments.

This is a multi-center, Phase II clinical study aiming to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and organ preservation feasibility of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus surgery in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who achieve clinical complete response/partial response (cCR/PR) after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. A total of 120 eligible subjects will be enrolled. Patients with cCR/PR after 2-3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy will be grouped based on personal willing: the control group (n=60) will receive radical esophagectomy + mediastinal lymph node dissection; the experimental group (n=60) will receive definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy: 50.4 Gy/28f; chemotherapy: nab-paclitaxel 175mg/m² + carboplatin AUC=5, q21d for 2 cycles). All the patients will receive camrelizumab maintenance therapy (200mg q21d) up to 1 year.

This study is a multicenter, single-arm prospective clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of TACE combined with thermal ablation, antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of HER2 - highly expressing gastric cancer with liver metastases.

This is clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and liver metastases.

This single-center, prospective, single-arm Phase II clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC, for up to 4 cycles) with iparomlimab/tuvonralimab plus bevacizumab followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who present with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) or extrahepatic oligometastatic disease. The study aims to determine whether this combination strategy can prolong progression-free survival (PFS), while also improving overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and local control rate (LCR), as well as maintaining quality of life (QoL). In addition, the trial will systematically evaluate the safety profile and treatment-related toxicities associated with this regimen.

Purpose of the Study: This clinical study investigates whether a shorter or longer duration of systemic therapy before local treatment (surgery or radiation) results in better disease control in patients with esophageal or gastric cancer with a limited number of metastases, also known as oligometastases. Background: In about 25% of patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer, the disease spreads to only a few sites (oligometastatic disease). Prior studies suggest that local treatment after systemic therapy may extend survival in this subgroup. However, it is unclear how long systemic therapy should last before initiating local treatment. The OMEC-5 study aims to clarify this and identify potential biomarkers for treatment response. Study Design: Initiated by Amsterdam UMC and UMCU and conducted in multiple hospitals across Europe. Total of 414 patients to be enrolled. Duration: \~53 months (35 months enrollment + 18 months follow-up). Approved by the medical ethics committee at Amsterdam UMC. Procedure: Eligibility screening: Includes physical exam, blood tests (incl. circulating tumor cells), medical history review, and confirmation of oligometastases by an expert panel. Initial treatment: All participants receive 4 months of standard systemic therapy (chemotherapy + immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy depending on tumor markers like HER2 or Claudin 18.2). Response assessment (Review 1): Imaging and/or laparoscopic examination. If oligometastases persist and tumors have not progressed, participants are randomized into two groups: Group A (longer systemic therapy): 4 more months of systemic therapy, then local treatment if disease is stable, followed by 4 months of immunotherapy ± targeted therapy. Group B (shorter systemic therapy): Immediate local treatment followed by 4 months of systemic therapy, then reassessment and potentially 4 months of immunotherapy ± targeted therapy. Follow-up: Regular scans and quality-of-life questionnaires (5 times), and periodic blood sampling (4 times). Treatments Involved: Chemotherapy: CapOx or FOLFOX Immunotherapy: nivolumab or pembrolizumab Targeted therapy: trastuzumab (HER2-positive) or zolbetuximab (Claudin 18.2-positive) Potential Benefits and Risks: Patients may benefit from better disease control and a personalized treatment strategy. Known side effects relate to the standard treatments used (chemo, immuno, targeted therapies), and no extra medical risk is expected beyond routine care. Possible inconveniences include blood draws, scans, minor surgery (laparoscopy), and time investment. Data and Sample Handling: Personal data and tumor/blood samples are coded and securely stored. Data may be used for future cancer research if the patient consents. Participants can withdraw at any time. Confidentiality and Privacy: Patient data are kept confidential, and participants have rights to access or delete their data. Privacy measures comply with GDPR and Dutch law. Compensation and Insurance: Participation is voluntary, with no financial compensation. Standard treatment costs are covered by healthcare insurance. No extra insurance is required, as the treatment aligns with standard care practices.

GOLDEN is a longitudinal database of patients with the symptoms (Sx) of gastroparesis (Gp) who were seen and recorded at the University of Louisville from 2012 and is ongoing. Patients are enrolled and followed by sequential numbers and may include legacy patients seen at other centers by some of the same team and who are reported as part of the series. Outcome relate to patients Sx, survival, quality of life and other measures as detailed below, over time. The study tracks patients regardless of treatment but specifically focuses on GI Neuromodulation (gastric electrical stimulation - GES), Immunotherapy (IVIG), and Pyloric therapies (pyloroplasty, endoscopic). If treatments were administered GOLDEN allows for examination and stratification of outcome by groups both at baseline and at follow up.

This Phase 1, multi-center, open-label, dose escalation and dose optimization study is designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PDx), and preliminary clinical activity of MOMA-341 administered orally as a single agent or combination therapy in patients with microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) solid tumors.

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab-bevacizumab doublet combined with FOLFOX-HAIC and TACE as the perioperative adjuvant therapy in surgical resection to hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk features. (1) Evaluate for some high-risk patients with resectable tumours, whether or not sintilimab-bevacizumab doublet combined with FOLFOX-HAIC and TACE reduces the risk of recurrence and improves the survival of patients. (2) Evaluate the safety of sintilimab-bevacizumab doublet combined with FOLFOX-HAIC and TACE for the neoadjuvant therapy of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

This phase II trial tests the safety and effectiveness of the combination of grid radiation therapy and standard of care (SOC) immunotherapy in treating patients with stage IV non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). Conventional radiation therapy treatments typically deliver the same radiation dose to the entire tumor. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy or grid therapy is approved and a technique which permits the delivery of high doses of radiation to small regions of the tumor which can lead to enhanced tumor cell killing. Grid therapy has been shown to produce dramatic relief of severe symptoms, significant tumor regression (decrease in the size of a tumor), and above average local control rates often exceeding those expected with conventionally delivered radiation treatments, all with minimal associated toxicity. Immunotherapy has become combined into treating patients, which has led improvements in survival and quality of life. Immunotherapy is now the cornerstone of SOC therapy for stage IV NSCLC. Grid radiation therapy combined with immunotherapy may be safe and effective in treating patients with stage IV NSCLC.

This clinical trial studies the side effects of stereotactic radiosurgery and how well it works with or without vertebroplasty, separation surgery, or immunotherapy in patients with cancer that is radiation resistant and has spread to the spine (spinal metastases). Spinal metastases are rapidly progressive, have poor prognosis, are extremely difficult to treat, and can effect patient quality of life and overall health. Immunotherapy is a type of standard of care therapy to boost or restore the ability of the immune system to fight cancer. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position the patient and precisely give a single large dose of radiation to a tumor. A vertebroplasty is a procedure used to repair a bone in the spine that has a break caused by cancer, osteoporosis, or trauma. The purpose of this trial is to test different combinations of immunotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and surgery to improve overall survival and quality of life in patients with spinal metastases.

Based on the preclinical rationale for combining surufatinib with immunotherapy, and the clinical efficacy observed with surufatinib in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), the investigators hypothesize that incorporating surufatinib into the ADRIATIC regimen could further enhance survival in LS-SCLC. To evaluate this approach, the investigators plan to conduct a single-arm Phase II study to explore the safety and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with toripalimab and surufatinib in treating LS-SCLC.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana in Slovenia. The main objectives are to assess treatment response rates, progression-free survival, and treatment safety, and to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers associated with response to immunotherapy. Biological samples including blood, stool, and body fluids (if available) will be collected at predefined time points and analyzed for molecular tumor markers. Imaging assessments (CT or PET/CT) will be performed before treatment initiation and during follow-up to evaluate response. The study aims to improve identification of patient subgroups who benefit from immunotherapy and those who do not, supporting better personalized treatment strategies.

This phase II trial seeks to determine the role of nodal radiation therapy after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with high risk sentinel lymph node positive melanoma who are planned for immunotherapy without completion lymph node dissection. Prior studies of patients with more advanced melanoma have shown nodal radiation therapy can decrease the risk of nodal recurrence but it is not known if this same benefit will be seen in patients with high risk sentinel lymph node positive disease who are planned for immunotherapy.

ADRIATIC study explored the benefits of immune maintenance therapy after LS-SCLC radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In the presence of immunotherapy, is it necessary to increase the dosage of radiotherapy and can it further improve the efficacy? This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated boost hyperfractionation radiotherapy combined with probiotics and Adalberg monoclonal antibody consolidation therapy for small cell lung cancer.

The hypothesis of the study is that induction immunochemotherapy, followed by surgery or chemoradiation and consolidation Durvalumab immunotherapy, can significantly improve event-free survival in patients with resectable or borderline resectable NSCLC at stage IIIA/B compared to existing treatment methods.

SCR-ESCC-01 is a multicenter, randomized, phase II study aiming to investigate the benefit of early involvement of low-dose radiotherapy(LDRT) and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy(CFRT) in the first-line anti-PD-1 based treatment of metastatic ESCC. It begins with a safety run-in phase, followed by a randomized controlled comparison against standard immunochemotherapy.

Esophageal cancer is the most prevalent cancer globally with poor survival outcome. The prognosis with surgery alone is poor, accounting for 30-40% of overall survival at 5 year. Either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has been shown as efficatious therapy to improve patients outcomes in esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer as compared with surgery alone. The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal neoadjuvant treatment modalities including PD-1/PD-L1 antibody or targeted drug for patients with esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in unresectable esophageal or esophagogastric cancer. A multidisciplinary approach, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, is important for these patients. Morerover, molecular targeting agents does not show clear efficacy in EC up to now. Nowadays, the pace of development of cancer immunotherapies is accelerating. Clinical evidence of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive immunotherapies herald the onset of a new era in cancer immunotherapy. There have also been recent developments to provide a promising frontier in extending the use of immunotherpay or targeting agents to radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal treatment modalities including PD-1/PD-L1 antibody or targeted drug for patients with unresectable esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer.

This study investigates the changes in positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging scans during chemoimmunotherapy and radiation therapy treatment in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Analyzing changes in PET/CT imaging scans may help doctors assess and predict patterns of cancer response to chemoimmunotherapy and radiation therapy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if immunotherapy in combination with tumor draining lymph nodes-sparing radiotherapy (TDLN-sparing RT) and chemotherapy works to treat locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer in adults. Researchers will compare immunotherapy in combination with TDLN-sparing RT and chemotherapy to TDLN-sparing RT and chemotherapy to see if immunotherapy works more effectively when using TDLN-sparing RT to treat locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer Participants will: TDLN-sparing RT for esophageal cancer 50.4Gy/28Fx Paclitaxel plus cisplatin every 3 weeks for 4 cycles PD-1 inhibitors or observation every 3 weeks for 1 year

dMMR/MSI-H is a key molecular subtype of gastric cancer, found in 8-22% of cases. It is typically associated with older age, female sex, distal tumor location, and intestinal histology (Lauren classification). While this subtype predicts better survival in locally advanced disease, its prognostic role in metastatic settings is less clear. Notably, dMMR/MSI-H tumors are often resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Conversely, they demonstrate exceptional sensitivity to immunotherapy. This has led to effective strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, in both neoadjuvant and advanced disease settings. However, key challenges remain. Prospective data are largely from Western populations, leaving the efficacy in Asian patients-who bear a high disease burden-less defined. Furthermore, about half of dMMR/MSI-H patients exhibit primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. A deeper understanding of the tumor-immune dynamics during treatment is crucial to uncover resistance mechanisms and improve patient outcomes.

This study is a phase III multi-institutional randomized trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between current standard of care treatment (Arm 1) vs. standard of care treatment + SABR (Arm 2) to sites of known disease. Patients will be stratified by two of the strongest prognostic factors, based on a large multi-institutional analysis3: histology (Group 1: hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, breast, or renal; Group 2: all others), and number of metastases (Group 1: 1-3; Group 2: 4-10).