A Retrospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Versus Endoscopic Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-80
SponsorSixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

About this trial

Robotic surgical systems provide notable advantages including enhanced dexterity, a magnified three-dimensional high-definition view, and high-resolution imaging, thereby improving operative stability and precision. These features make robotic systems particularly suitable for procedures performed within confined operative spaces. As the breast is a solid organ without a natural cavity, robotic systems demonstrate strong adaptability for breast surgery. Robot-assisted breast-conserving surgery (RABCS) is one of the currently utilized robotic techniques in clinical breast cancer surgery. However, as robotic breast surgery remains in its early stage of development, evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of RABCS remains limited in the literature. Therefore, this study compares the surgical outcomes of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and robot-assisted breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients, aiming to assess and elucidate the clinical value of RABCS.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Female patients aged 18 to 80 years

Pathologically confirmed breast cancer prior to surgery

Sufficient glandular volume with a tumor-to-breast volume ratio ≤20%

A unifocal lesion confined to the glandular tissue

Disqualifiers

The presence of diffuse suspicious lesions or microcalcifications for which wide local resection was unlikely to achieve adequate negative margins or satisfactory aesthetic outcomes

Bilateral breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer

After neoadjuvant therapy, requirement for additional concurrent surgical procedures

Inability to tolerate general anesthesia or undergo surgery

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Robotic breast-conserving surgery
  • Endoscopic breast-conserving surgery

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups