A Study Comparing Shoulder Replacement Techniques For Patients With Shoulder Arthritis And An Intact Rotator Cuff

ConditionShoulder Arthritis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting

Trial phaseNot applicable

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

Age60-85

SponsorMayo Clinic

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to determine if patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) will have improved patient reported outcome scores at 1 year compared to those undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Shoulder arthritis

Intact rotator cuff

Glenoid retroversion less than 25°

Disqualifiers

Rotator cuff insufficiency

Fracture deformity/sequelae

Severe glenoid deformity (C glenoid, severe A2, B2 glenoid)

Current or previous infection of shoulder

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

aTSA
rTSA

Treatment groups

108 Participants

are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Mayo Clinic

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov