A Study of Pain Reduction After Pulmonary Resection by RATS-TT, RATS-OTC, and Hybrid RATS.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

About this trial

Pulmonary resections are key in treating lung neoplasms, with techniques adapted to tumor size and location. Minimally invasive approaches like VATS have replaced open thoracotomy, but intercostal trocar placement can lead to nerve injury and chronic pain.

Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is usually done via a transthoracic (RATS-TT) approach using intercostal trocars. A newer "out of cage" method (RATS-OTC), using subcostal or subxiphoid ports, avoids intercostal access, potentially reducing nerve damage. A French study showed less opioid use and acute pain with RATS-OTC, but chronic pain outcomes are still unknown.

At CHUM, a hybrid RATS technique (RATS-TTH) is also used-intercostal for instruments, but with out-of-cage specimen extraction-to limit intercostal trauma.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged 18 years and older

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-3

Disqualifiers

Language barrier, psychiatric, physical or mental condition making pain assessment impossible despite prior education

Patient refusal to participate

Patients reoperated by VATS or thoracotomy in the postoperative period in the context of the occurrence of complications

Trial population

Patients undergoing elective anatomical pulmonary resection (anatomical segmentectomy, lobectomy or bilobectomy) via minimally invasive approach (robotic).

Trial design

Design model

Other

Time perspective

Other

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Evaluation of chronic pain at 3 and 6 months after thoracic surgery

    Other intervention

    The presence of persistent postoperative pain, defined as ipsilateral chest pain (on the same side as the surgery) occurring at rest and/or with coughing on a daily basis. Assessed by a 'yes' or 'no' response when asked at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Pulmonary resections surgery with three surgical approaches:1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Presence of persistent postoperative pain

The presence of persistent postoperative pain, defined as ipsilateral chest pain (on the same side as the surgery) occurring at rest and/or with coughing on a daily basis. Assessed by a 'yes' or 'no' response when asked at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Time frame
3 and 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Occurrence of a neuropathic pain component

The occurrence of a neuropathic pain component, assessed using the DN4-interview questionnaire, administered via telephone at 3 and 6 months to identify a neuropathic component. A score of 3 or higher is considered a positive result.

Time frame
3 and 6 months after surgery
2

Impact of chronic pain on overall recovery

The impact of chronic pain on overall recovery, assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) via telephone at 3 and 6 months. A change of 2 points or more on the 10-point pain intensity scale is considered clinically significant. Similarly, a change of at least 1 point on the pain interference score with quality of life is considered clinically significant.

Time frame
3 and 6 months after surgery
3

Preoperative analgesic use

Preoperative analgesic use, determined by documenting the type of medication (opioids, anti-inflammatories, neuropathic pain treatments, etc.) and the dosage taken at home prior to surgery.

Time frame
On the day of the surgery
4

Overall recovery

Overall recovery, assessed by opioid consumption at 3 and 6 months, new prescriptions for neuropathic pain medications in the postoperative period, and whether the patient is still taking them at 3 and 6 months.

Time frame
3 and 6 months after surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.