Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

ConditionPregnancy
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-50
SponsorInova Health Care Services

About this trial

Despite the high numbers of cesareans being performed, scientific evidence behind which surgical techniques are best remains uncertain. Our objective is to determine if subcuticular absorbable staples improve operative time and wound cosmetics

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

18-50 years of age

Women ≥ 24 weeks viable gestation

Will be undergoing cesarean delivery

Disqualifiers

Patient unwilling or unable to provide consent.

No or very limited prenatal care or a non-resident patient who is unlikely to follow-up after delivery.

Immunosuppressed subjects: i.e., taking systemic immunosuppressant or steroids (e.g. transplant subjects; not including steroids for lung maturity), HIV with CD4 <200, or other

Decision not to have skin closure (e.g. secondary wound closure, mesh closure)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Subcuticular monocryl suture
  • Subcuticular absorbable staple using Insorb device

Treatment groups

237 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators