Access Sheaths With Aspiration for Renal RetrOgrade Surgery, Randomized CompArative Outcomes

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath (Coloplast) is more effective than the Navigator ureteral access sheath (Boston Scientific) in treating intrarenal kidney stones of 1-3 cm in adult patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does ClearPetra achieve a higher stone-free rate at 1 month post-intervention compared to Navigator, as assessed by non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan?

Does ClearPetra reduce total surgical time compared to Navigator?

Does ClearPetra lower the retreatment rate at 3 months compared to Navigator?

Does ClearPetra present a rate of clinically significant complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II) that is lower than or similar to Navigator?

Researchers will compare flexible ureteroscopy using the ClearPetra vacuum-assisted flexible ureteral access sheath to flexible ureteroscopy using the Navigator standard rigid ureteral access sheath, to see if ClearPetra leads to higher stone clearance rates while maintaining a comparable safety profile.

Participants will:

Undergo flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) using one of two randomly assigned ureteral access sheaths (ClearPetra or Navigator), determined by computer-generated randomization immediately before surgery

Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 1 month post-intervention to assess stone-free status

Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 3 months post-intervention to evaluate residual fragments and the need for retreatment

Attend follow-up visits at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery for clinical assessment and complication recording

The study will be conducted at the Urology Department of Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain), a tertiary reference centre. A total of 156 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (78 per group), with pre-defined subgroup analyses stratified by stone size (1-2 cm vs. \>2 cm). The outcome assessor evaluating CT images for stone-free rate will be blinded to treatment allocation (single-blind).

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years

Diagnosis of intrarenal lithiasis with maximum stone diameter of 1-3 cm on preoperative non-contrast abdomino-pelvic CT scan

Candidate for treatment by flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) as indicated by the treating urologist

Attended at the Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain)

Disqualifiers

Active urinary tract infection or urosepsis at the time of the planned intervention

Known ureteral stricture precluding passage of a ureteral access sheath

Pregnancy

Prior urinary diversion incompatible with transurethral access (e.g., urinary conduit, neobladder)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ClearPetra ureteral access sheath
  • Navigator ureteral access sheath

Treatment groups

156 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups