About this trial
Moderate-intensity physical exercise is widely recognized for its health benefits, yet time constraints limit adherence. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has gained popularity as a more time-efficient alternative, eliciting significant cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, and neuromuscular responses. More recently, functional strength exercises have been integrated into high-intensity training, leading to high-intensity functional training (HIFT) and moderate-intensity functional training (MIFT). However, the acute physiological responses to these modalities remain underexplored compared to traditional HIIT (running or cycling) and strength training. This study aims to assess and compare the acute cardiovascular, metabolic, and neuromuscular responses of HIFT, MIFT, HIIT, and traditional strength training in healthy, physically active adults to inform their potential application in special populations.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Be 18 years of age or older.
Have at least 6 months of experience in strength training with intensities greater than 75% of one maximum repetition (1-RM).
Be classified as active according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score.
Disqualifiers
Musculoskeletal injury within the 6 months prior to the first visit to the laboratory.
Recent major surgery (<3 months).
Having a medical condition in which physical activity is contraindicated (assessed with the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire, PAR-Q+).
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- High-intensity interval training, running
- High-intensity interval training, cycling
- High-intensity functional training
- Moderate-intensity functional training
- Moderate intensity traditional strength training
- High intensity traditional strength training
Treatment groups
6
Treatment groupsSee each treatment group below.
Sponsors and collaborators
European University Miguel de Cervantes
Lead sponsor
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Collaborator