Hypergranulation (HG) is well documented and a known barrier to wound healing. Accurate clinical assessment of wounds is crucial in managing HG and evaluating treatment response. Currently there is no standardised assessment for healthcare professionals to assess the severity of HG. Through a modified Delphi process involving wound care clinical experts, a prototype Hypergranulation Tool has been developed to be used in clinical practice. The Hypergranulation Tool allows assessors to grade HG within wounds as mild, moderate and severe, based on 5 separate parameters. A prospective multi-site observational study based in the United Kingdom of 80-100 adult and paediatric patients with HG within venous leg ulcers (VLU) or complex surgical wounds (CSW) will allow performance testing of the Hypergranulation Tool. Study nurses will assess wounds with the Hypergranulation Tool across 2-4 clinic visits. Data from the use of the tool will be compared with quantitative 3D analysis of the wounds, patient reported outcome and patient interview data, to help determine the validity of the Hypergranulation Tool in the clinical setting. Results from the Observational Study will inform design changes to the Hyergranulation Tool as well as the design of future HG intervention trials.
Male or female participants between 2 to 85 years of age (both inclusive).
Willing and able to provide written informed consent or assent (as applicable) as evidenced by signature on the participant's consent/assent form. In case if the child is providing assent, a caregiver or LAR must sign an informed consent.
a VLU unhealed for a minimum of 6 weeks, but no longer than 24 weeks
an unhealed surgical wound that has been unhealed for at least 2 weeks but no longer than 24 weeks
Unable to provide informed consent or assent
Unable to complete the scheduled study treatments and assessments
Have been previously recruited into this study
Participants who are < 2 years or >85 years of age