Approach-Avoidance, Computational Framework for Predicting Behavioral Therapy Outcome (AAC-BeT)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.

About this trial

Depression and anxiety disorders rank in the top ten causes of years lived with disability. Less than 50% of patients experiencing long-lasting improvements to current gold-standard treatments. Two gold-standard behavioral interventions include behavioral activation, focused on enhancing approach behavior towards meaningful activities, and exposure-based therapy, focused on decreasing avoidance and challenging negative expectations. While these interventions have divergent treatment targets, there is little knowledge to inform which strategies should be used in the frequent case of comorbid anxiety and depression. Approach-avoidance decision-making paradigms focus on assessing responses when faced with potential rewards and threats, tapping into processes important for both anxiety and depression as well as behavioral activation and exposure-based therapy.

For this study, investigators will recruit individuals reporting both anxiety and depression symptoms and randomize them to one of three different interventions: (1) behavioral activation, (2) exposure-based therapy, and a non-specific therapy approach (3) supportive therapy. Participants will complete clinical, self-report, behavioral, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessments before and after therapy. Investigators will use a computational approach to model factors that may influence one's behavior during approach-avoidance decision-making, including drives to avoid threat versus approach reward and confidence versus uncertainty in one's decisions.

This project will accomplish the following aims (1) Determine how changes in brain and behavior responses during approach-avoidance conflict relate to changes in mental health symptoms with the different therapy approaches, (2) Determine the degree to which baseline brain and behavior responses during approach-avoidance conflict predict response to the different therapy approaches, above and beyond the influence of demographics and baseline symptom severity. In addition, by including peripheral blood draws and measures of grace matter volume, the project will also accomplish the following aims: (1) Determine whether kynrenine metabolites measures peripherally may be beneficial as a biomarker of treatment response and (2) determine whether there is an association between change in kynurenine metabolites and changes in gray matter volume with treatment.

Results will enhance understanding of how different psychotherapy approaches (behavioral activation, exposure-based therapy) may impact brain responses and decisions when faces with potential reward versus threat and approach versus avoidance drives. In addition, results will have important implications concerning the potential for a more personalized approach to psychotherapy, enhancing knowledge of which types of therapy strategies may be most beneficial for which individuals.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

score >55 on both the PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scales

score >5 on any one item of the SDS

able to provide informed consent

report of anxiety and depressive symptoms as areas of clinical concern

Disqualifiers

significant or unstable physical or mental health conditions (e.g., immediate suicidal intent) requiring medical attention

history of bipolar, psychotic, cognitive, obsessive compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

history of moderate to severe substance use disorder over the past year

diagnosis of neurologic disorders

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Behavioral Activation

    Behavioral

    Behavioral activation will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized, behavioral intervention focused on enhancing engagement in meaningful and reinforcing activities.

  • Exposure-based therapy

    Behavioral

    Exposure-based therapy will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized, behavioral intervention focused on decreasing avoidance to allow for inhibitory learning and challenging negative expectations.

  • Supportive therapy

    Behavioral

    Supportive therapy will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized intervention focused on encouraging patients to talk openly about their thoughts, emotions, and any past or current concerns.

Treatment groups

220 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Behavioral activationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Exposure-based therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Supportive therapyActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Composite score from Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)

Composite score (averaging of the standardized Z scores) from the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). These Z scores will range from -3.0 to +3.0, with greater scores indicating more severe anxiety and depression symptoms or worse outcome.

Time frame
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
2

Quinolinic Acid

Peripheral serum concentration of Quinolinic Acid

Time frame
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments

Secondary outcomes

1

Sheehan Disability Scale

Sheehan Disability Scale total score. This score ranges from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater disability or worse outcome.

Time frame
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
2

National Institute of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcome Measurement and Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Scale

National Institute of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcome Measurement and Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Scale, which is reported as a T score. The T scores can range from - to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity or worse outcome.

Time frame
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
3

National Institute of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcome Measurement and Information System (PROMIS) Depression Scale

National Institute of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcome Measurement and Information System (PROMIS) Depression Scale, which is reported as a T score. The T scores can range from - to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity or worse outcome.

Time frame
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
4

Kynurenic acid

Peripheral serum concentration of kynurenic acid

Time frame
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments

Other outcomes

1

Amygdala reactivity to negative outcomes

Beta coefficient from general linear model for right amygdala region of interest in response to negative image outcome phase of an approach-avoidance conflict decision-making task. Standardized beta coefficients have a range of 0 to 1, with greater values indicating greater amygdala reactivity or worse outcomes.

Time frame
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments.
2

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reactivity to conflict decisions

Beta coefficient from general linear model for right dorsolateral prefrontal region of interest in response to the conflict decision phase of an approach-avoidance conflict decision-making task. Standardized beta coefficients have a range of 0 to 1, with greater values indicating greater dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reactivity.

Time frame
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments.
3

Dorsal striatal reactivity to negative outcomes

Beta coefficient from general linear model for dorsal striatal region of interest in response to negative image outcome phase of an approach-avoidance conflict decision-making task. Standardized beta coefficients have a range of 0 to 1, with greater values indicating greater striatal reactivity.

Time frame
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments.
4

Decision uncertainty during approach-avoidance conflict decision making

Decision uncertainty parameter from computational modeling of behavioral responses on the approach avoidance conflict task. Parameter values have a range of 0 to 20, with greater values indicating greater decision uncertainty.

Time frame
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Collaborator