Brain Structure and Clinical Endpoints in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age30-65
SponsorWake Forest University Health Sciences

About this trial

Nearly two-third of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) report that impaired cognition is among the most disabling symptoms and deeply affects their quality of life. Yet, relatively little is known about how DM2 affects brain structure and cognitive function as brain imaging studies in DM2 are extremely limited. This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of brain structure and function on cognitive and motor performance in patients with DM2 \& DM1 compared to healthy controls. All participants will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate brain structure and white matter integrity, a comprehensive battery of cognitive and motor measures, self-reported questionnaires, and blood collection for brain-based biomarker analysis. A subset of participants will undergo lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection for additional biomarker analysis and validation. This work is critical to inform the development of rigorous clinical trial designs and plan for a longitudinal study to evaluate MRI measures as imaging biomarkers of disease progression and therapeutic response in DM2 \& DM1.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 30-65 years old

Diagnosis of DM1 or DM2 is based on genetic testing and/or clinical criteria. If the diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, positive DM2 genetic testing is required in first-degree relatives

Symptoms or clinical findings of proximal muscle weakness

Ambulate independently (a cane or walking stick is permitted)

Disqualifiers

Congenital or juvenile-onset DM1 (onset of first symptom < 20-year-old)

Individuals with a prior diagnosis of dementia, seizure, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, or other neurodegenerative diseases

Individuals with active psychiatric illness or alcohol/substance abuse.

On medications with substantial sedative or cognitive side effects unless the doses have been stable for at least 3 months before the study visit.

Trial population

Myotonic dystrophy is a rare disease with an estimated prevalence rate of 12.5/100,000 in both myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and DM2. There are no expected gender differences. Both men and women will be selected for this study.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Non-interventional study

    Other intervention

    No intervention will be administered as part of this study.

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 21 intervention
Group B: Controls1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Measures of voxel-based brain morphometry

Measures of brain volume will be expressed as a ratio (0 to 1) to intracranial volume to create proportional values of brain volume.

Time frame
Baseline
2

Fractional Anisotropy (FA)

FA is an index of non-uniform movement of water molecules ranging from 0 to 1. Higher values of FA indicate healthy, dense, and well-organized white matter fibers. Lower values of FA indicate less healthy white matter track.

Time frame
Baseline
3

Radial Diffusivity (RD)

The value of apparent water diffusion coefficient in the direction perpendicular to the axonal fibers. The higher RD value indicates high dispersion of water and poorly-organized white matter fibers.

Time frame
Baseline
4

Axial Diffusivity (AD)

The value of apparent water diffusion coefficient in the direction lying along with the axonal fibers. The higher AD value indicates greater extracellular water content consecutively to the impaired white-matter fibers health, and to alterations of axonal water content

Time frame
Baseline

Secondary outcomes

1

NIH-Toolbox (TB) Cognitive Measures: Executive Function Domain Scores

Raw scores of Dimensional Card Sorting will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better executive function.

Time frame
Baseline
2

NIH-TB: Executive Function/Attention Domain Scores

Raw scores of Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better attention and executive function.

Time frame
Baseline
3

NIH-TB: Processing Speed Domain Scores

Raw scores of Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better processing speed.

Time frame
Baseline
4

NIH-TB: Language Domain Scores

Raw scores of Oral Reading Recognition Test will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better language domain.

Time frame
Baseline

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Collaborator