Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age25-70
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

This study aims to compare the implant stability values following implant placement via Osteotomes and via Osseodensification using Densah Burs versus implant placement using conventional drilling technique in patients with upper posterior partially edentulous ridges as well as evaluating the crestal bone loss around temporary restorations following the three compared drilling techniques.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients with an age range of 25-70 years

Patients with systemic health

Patient with missing teeth in the upper posterior area

Patients with D3 or D4 type of alveolar bone

Disqualifiers

Pregnant females

Smokers

Patients with habits that may compromise the longevity and affect the result of the implant as alcoholism or parafunctional habits

History of radiotherapy or use of bisphosphonates

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Densah Burs
  • Osteotomes
  • Conventional drilling

Treatment groups

36 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators