Clinical and Radiographical Assessment of Patients With Sub-condylar Fracture Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Trapezoidal Plates Versus Titanium Trapezoidal Plates

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

Some of titanium's drawbacks that is commonly used in maxillofacial surgery included scatter artefacts on regular imaging, implant exposure and inflammation, high thermal conductivity, and high elastic modulus. Very few clinical studies have been published on using a PEEK plate in the mandibular fractures and to the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first study that will be done comparing trapezoidal condylar 3D printed PEEK plates and titanium trapezoidal condylar plate in subcondylar fractures in terms of clinical and radiographical outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients aged 18 years or older, irrespective of gender

Recent mandibular subcondylar fractures indicated for open reduction and internal fixation

Disqualifiers

Medically compromised patients contradicting operation (ASA III, IV & V).

Patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

Infection at the fracture line.

Pathological fractures and old fractures

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • titanium trapezoidal plates
  • PEEK trapezoidal plates

Treatment groups

24 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators