Clinical Efficacy of Self-adhesive Silicone Gel Waterproof Dressings Versus Conventional Dressings in the Healing of Incisions After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University

About this trial

The efficacy of using self-adhesive silicone gel waterproof dressings versus conventional gauze dressings for recovery after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains unclear. In our study, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare these two types of dressings. Patients were divided into two groups following TJA, and we collected primary outcome measures such as skin infection rate and re-operation rate. Additionally, we gathered blood inflammatory indicators, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), to evaluate the effectiveness of the two treatments. Finally, we perform one year follow up including REEDA score, MSS score to evaluate the recovery of the skin.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years old, gender is not limited;

Meet the diagnostic criteria for artificial joint replacement;

Initial joint replacement surgery;

Voluntary and signed informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Allergic to self-adhesive silicone rubber waterproof dressing;

Patients with severe knee joint infection who cannot undergo artificial joint replacement;

Progressive renal insufficiency (stage 4 and above) or glomerular filtration rate less than 30ml/min;

periprosthesis infection after multiple joint replacement;

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Self-adhesive silicone gel waterproof dressing
  • Sterile gauze dressing

Treatment groups

600 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations