Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21-60
SponsorCairo University
About this trial
This study aims to evaluate the effect of biological drilling osteotomy protocol compared to conventional osteotomy protocol in delayed implant placement in the posterior mandible regarding implant stability Type of study design: Randomized Clinical Trial In patient indicated for delayed implant placement in the lower posterior mandible will the use of biological drilling protocol osteotomy compared to conventional drilling protocol osteotomy differ regarding implant stability at three months?
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Systemically healthy male and female patients, aged 21 to 60 years old,
Indicated for delayed implant placement in the posterior mandibular arch.
Good oral health.
Willingness to sign the informed consent form.
Disqualifiers
Heavy smoker (> 10 cigarettes/day)
Pregnant females
Contraindication for Implant surgery.
Patients with poor oral hygiene.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Biological drilling osteotomy protocol
- Conventional drilling osteotomy protocol
Treatment groups
28 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov