Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Conjuran® After First and Second Cycle (Repeat) Administration in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40+
SponsorPharmaResearch Co.,Ltd

About this trial

This clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Conjuran® and Hyruan in patients with knee osteoarthritis following first and second cycle (repeat) administration.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥40 years

Knee osteoarthritis diagnosed according to ACR criteria

KL grade I-III

Weight-bearing pain VAS ≥40 mm

Disqualifiers

Inflammatory or secondary arthritis

Recent treatment in the target knee

Significant uncontrolled medical conditions

Hypersensitivity to study device components

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conjuran

    Device

    Once a week for 5 injections

  • Hyruan

    Drug

    Once a week for 5 injections

Treatment groups

180 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ConjuranExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: HyruanActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Weight-Bearing Pain (WBP) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Change from baseline in WBP after the first treatment assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse pain

Time frame
Week 16

Secondary outcomes

1

Weight-Bearing Pain (WBP), Resting Pain (RP), and Motion Pain (MP) VAS

Change from baseline in WBP, RP, and MP after the first and second treatment cycles, assessed using a 100-mm VAS (0-100). Higher scores indicate worse pain.

Time frame
Up to 56 weeks
2

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score

Change from baseline in WOMAC total and subscale scores after the first and second treatment cycles. WOMAC is a 24-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

Time frame
Up to 56 weeks
3

EQ-5D (EuroQol 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire)

Change from baseline in EQ-5D score after the first and second treatment cycles. EQ-5D consists of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and an EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS; 0-100). Higher scores indicate better health status.

Time frame
Up to 56 weeks
4

Patient Global Assessment (PGA), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)

Change from baseline in PGA and IGA after the first and second treatment cycles, assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-100). Higher scores indicate worse disease status.

Time frame
Up to 56 weeks

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: