Coblation Versus Bipolar Diathermy in Management of Refractory Idiopathic Recurrent Anterior Epistaxis in Children.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age6-17
SponsorAssiut University

About this trial

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of coblation technique versus bipolar technique in management of RAE in children regarding the following:

1. Efficacy of each method to stop bleeding. 2. Technical feasibility. 3. Mucosal healing and crust formation. 4. Post operative complications like: synechia formation and septal perforation. 5. Nostril stenosis/ atresia.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

A history of repeated unilateral epistaxis with at least four episodes, at least one episode per week during the preceding 4 weeks.

Age > 5 years of age and < 18 years of age.

Failure of topical treatment with an antiseptic ointment, with or without silver nitrate cautery.

A Katsanis epistaxis scoring system (ESS) score of 7-10.

Disqualifiers

Patients < 5 years of age and >= 18 years of age.

Patients with bilateral epistaxis.

Patients with bleeding tendencies like: Hemophilia, Leukemia, Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, Von Willebrand disease and Thrombasthenia.

Patients with previous nasal surgeries.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • bipolar diathermy "Standard technique".
  • coblation technique.

Treatment groups

64 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators