Comparative Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training Versus Blood Flow Restriction Cycling on Pain, Quadriceps Strength, and Functional Outcomes in Athletes With Patellofemoral Pain

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-40
SponsorIbadat International University, Islamabad

About this trial

This randomized controlled trial compares blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance training (leg press and seated knee extension at 30% 1RM) versus BFR cycling (stationary cycling at low resistance) in 60 athletes (aged 18-40 years) diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Both interventions are delivered over 8 weeks (3 sessions/week) with a pneumatic cuff set at 80% limb occlusion pressure. Primary outcomes include pain intensity (NPRS), quadriceps strength (handheld dynamometer), and functional ability (Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale), assessed at baseline and post-intervention.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Male and female athletes aged 18-40 years

Clinically diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Anterior or retropatellar knee pain of at least 3 months duration

Pain provoked by at least two functional activities (e.g., squatting, stair climbing, running, prolonged sitting)

Disqualifiers

History of knee surgery or significant knee trauma in the past 6 months

Presence of ligament, meniscal, or cartilage injuries

Neurological, vascular, or systemic inflammatory conditions

Contraindications to BFR training (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, uncontrolled hypertension)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training
  • Blood Flow Restriction Cycling

Treatment groups

48 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups