Comparative Evaluation of Novel 3D Tunneling Technique Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) With Connective Tissue Graft in the Management of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

Defects associated with severe interdental hard and soft tissue loss are challenging to the periodontist, mainly due to the increased avascular surface and the reduced interproximal periosteal bed. Reports on the surgical techniques used to address recession type 2 or 3 defects mostly showed statistics on the mid-facial root coverage that yielded outcomes that do not encompass coverage of the interdental exposed root surface which highlights areas of controversy in their use for papilla reconstruction. Several case reports and clinical studies have shown encouraging results, but the long-term data are not available in the literature yet. The novel 3D tunneling (3DT) method achieved significant clinical improvement with long term stability in a recent case series. However, additional research is needed to validate 3DT for its routine clinical use. Moreover, the 3DT method achieved a decrease in the lingual recession depth which should be pointed out that the technique also addresses lingual recession.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Buccal and lingual multiple adjacent recession defects classified as Cairo et al RT2.

Age ≥18 years

Full mouth plaque index score less than 20% O'Leary et al. 1972

Patients with healthy systemic condition

Disqualifiers

Patients with systemically compromised health

Periodontal surgical treatment during the previous 24 months in the involved site

Pregnant or lactating mothers

Smokers

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Root coverage

Treatment groups

36 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators