Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Treatment of Idiopathic Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Children: Oxybutynine vs. Transcutaneous Neurostimulation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age6-16
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

About this trial

The absence of infectious, urological and neurological causes defines the idiopathic character of overactive bladder (OAB). Although a progressive approach starting with behavioural therapy (urotherapy) is recommended, anticholinergic agents remain the mainstay of medical treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in children. Bladder neuromodulation is also used but no study with sufficient evidence has assessed its effectiveness and tolerance compared to the reference treatment. The purpose of HAV-O-TENS is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of treating idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in children using posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) compared to the reference treatment with oxybutynin after three months of treatment.

Before inclusion, patients will receive instructions for urotherapy and a treatment plan. After confirming the diagnosis and obtaining informed consent, patients will be randomly assigned to either oxybutynin or PTNS (posterior tibial nerve stimulation) treatment, and their effectiveness, tolerance, and adherence will be monitored.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged 6 to 16 years

Showing signs of OAB (pollakiuria (> 8 micturitions/d and/or urgenturia(>x2/week) and/or daytime urine leakage (1/d) and/or nocturia x2/night)

No treatment for more than 3 months

Urotherapy rules followed for at least 1 month

Disqualifiers

Neurological cause of bladder dysfunction,

History of pelvic surgery,

Significant post-micturition residual (> 10% of micturition),

Recurrent urinary tract infections (> 3) in the 6 months prior to inclusion or urinary tract infection at inclusion.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Oxybutynin

    Other intervention

    oxybutynin

  • medical device Urostim

    Device

    medical device used to deliver posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)

Treatment groups

124 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: oxybutyninActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: TENSExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Variation of DVISS score between PTNS treatment group and oxybutynin group

DVISS score is : Dysfunctional Voiding and Incontinence Symptoms Score (DVISS) Questionnaire. The DVISS is a 13-item instrument that includes 1 QOL question. The first 5 questions are scored using an ordinal scale with the remainder in binary format. The DVISS scores are based on the estimated odds ratio (OR) for each question between cases and controls. For example, a score of 1 is given if the item's OR is between 2 and 10, and a score of 5 is given if the OR is greater than 50. The total score can range from 0 to 35 with a cutoff score of 8.5 having 90% sensitivity and specificity at detecting BBD.

Time frame
at 3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

variation of treatment duration between both groups

Time frame
at 6 months
2

variation of time to treatment efficacy between both groups

Time frame
at 6 months
3

variation of tolerance between both groups

Time frame
at 3 months
4

variation of tolerance between both groups

Time frame
at 6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen

Collaborator