Comparing ACB+IPACK and ACB+BiFeS Block Combinations for Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorHitit University

About this trial

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with severe postoperative pain that delays mobilization, prolongs hospital stay, and reduces patient satisfaction. Regional analgesia techniques have gained prominence due to their opioid-sparing effects and favorable complication profiles compared to general anesthesia. While adductor canal block (ACB) effectively manages anterior knee pain with preserved motor function, posterior knee pain remains a challenge. IPACK (Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee) and the Biceps Femoris Short Head (BiFeS) block are techniques targeting posterior capsule innervation without causing motor block.This prospective study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided ACB+IPACK versus ACB+BiFeS block combinations in patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia. Patients (ASA I-III, age 18-80, BMI ≤35) will be randomized into two groups (n=39 each). Primary outcomes include NRS pain scores at rest and on movement, and opioid consumption at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include time to first mobilization, motor block incidence, quadriceps muscle strength assessment, PONV, and quality of recovery (QoR-15).

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty surgery

ASA physical status classification I-III

Hemodynamically stable

Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years

Disqualifiers

Revision total knee arthroplasty surgery

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty

BMI > 40 kg/m²

ASA physical status classification 4-5

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ACB+IPACK Group
  • ACB+BiFeS Group

Treatment groups

78 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators