Comparing Basilic and Cephalic Vein Approaches for Midline Catheter Placement in Children

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-17
SponsorSeoul National University Hospital

About this trial

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare basilic vein and cephalic vein approaches for midline catheter placement in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Participants aged 2 to 17 years who require midline catheter insertion will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either the basilic vein group or the cephalic vein group. The primary outcome is the clinical blood sampling success rate during the catheter dwell period, defined as successful aspiration of ≥2 mL of blood through the midline catheter at least once without additional venipuncture. Secondary outcomes include operator-rated difficulty, number of puncture attempts, first attempt cannulation success rate, vein diameter and depth, catheter dwell time, catheter-related complications, and patient satisfaction. A total of 96 participants (48 per arm) will be enrolled at Seoul National University Children's Hospital.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age 2-17 years undergoing general anesthesia

Midline catheter placement deemed necessary by attending anesthesiologist (≥1 of: expected ≥2 postop blood draws; expected blood loss ≥40% EBV; continuous antibiotic therapy; hospitalization ≥7 days; surgical team request)

Disqualifiers

Need for central venous catheter per surgical team

Coagulopathy

History of severe thrombosis

Other investigator-determined ineligibility

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Midline catheter placement via basilic vein
  • Midline catheter placement via cephalic vein

Treatment groups

96 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups