Comparing Jaw Tracking and Traditional Methods for Measuring Bite Accuracy in Patients With Teeth

ConditionJaw Tracking
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorOmer Abdelmagid

About this trial

This study compares two methods used to measure how teeth come together (occlusal contacts) in patients who have natural teeth (dentate patients). The first method uses a modern jaw tracking device, while the second relies on the conventional mounting technique. The goal is to determine which method is more accurate for diagnosing bite alignment and contact points. This is a diagnostic test accuracy study, meaning it focuses on evaluating how well each technique performs in identifying the correct occlusal contacts.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Jaw Tracking Device

Treatment groups

18 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators

Omer Abdelmagid

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Sponsor institution