Comparing Mixed Reality, Video-Based, and Instructor-Led Training for Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Nursing Students

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Turku

About this trial

This study explores how nursing students learn to insert a nasogastric tube (NGT), a common but potentially risky clinical procedure. The goal is to compare three different teaching methods:

Mixed Reality (MR) glasses with virtual instructions Video-based learning Traditional instructor-led training

The study investigates which method leads to better learning outcomes, how usable the technologies are, and how students experience MR in their learning.

Participants will be first-year nursing students with no prior experience in NGT insertion. They will be randomly assigned to one of the three training methods, complete the procedure, and answer questionnaires about their performance and experience. Six months later, they will repeat the procedure to assess long-term learning.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

First-year nursing student

Performing nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion for the first time

No prior theoretical education or pre-material on NGT insertion procedure

Disqualifiers

Previous nursing education (e.g., practical nurse qualification)

Diagnosis of epilepsy

Presence of a pacemaker

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mixed Reality NGT Training
  • Video-Based NGT Training
  • Instructor-Led NGT Training

Treatment groups

160 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

University of Turku

Lead sponsor

Turku University of Applied Sciences

Collaborator