About this trial
The 2023 World Journal of Emergency Surgery guidelines couldn't provide a recommendation for emergency abdominal wall closure due to insufficient consensus (\>80% required). Available evidence, predominantly retrospective and heterogeneous, lacks differentiation between urgent and elective colorectal surgeries. Therefore, we advocate for a study comparing laparotomy closures in emergency colorectal surgery to contribute evidence on incisional hernia incidence and subsequent complications.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patients diagnosed with colorectal pathology requiring urgent surgical treatment via midline laparotomy.
Patients undergoing urgent laparoscopic surgery but necessitating conversion to midline laparotomy.
Urgent surgical intervention required at the level of the colon and/or rectum, even in the presence of other abdominal pathologies.
Age over 18 years.
Disqualifiers
Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to the GOLD classification or decompensated COPD.
BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2.
Re-laparotomies.
Patients with psychiatric illnesses, addictions, or any disorder hindering the understanding of the Informed Consent.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Closure of the midline laparotomy using the "small bites" technique
- Closure of the midline laparotomy using the "small bites" technique with an absorbable PP mesh
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Fernandez Zamora
Lead sponsor
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
Sponsor institution