Comparing the Attentional Demands and Functional Outcomes in People With Transradial Amputation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorVirginia Commonwealth University

About this trial

Different ways of controlling an upper-limb prosthesis can affect how easy it is to use and how helpful it is in everyday activities. One common method, called direct control, uses signals from two muscles and can make switching between movements difficult. Another clinically available option, called pattern recognition control, uses signals from several muscles to better understand the user's intended movement and may feel more natural to use. This study compares these two control methods to see how they affect function for adults with below-the-elbow limb loss.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

18 years of age or older

Unilateral transradial limb loss

At least 6 months since loss

Previous or current use of a myoelectric device for 3 months or longer

Disqualifiers

Any health condition that would prevent safely completing trial activities

Discontinued use of a myoelectric prosthesis due to non-financial reasons

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Training with PRC
  • Training with DC
  • PRC Device use in community and home
  • DC Device use in community and home

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Virginia Commonwealth University

Lead sponsor

United States Department of Defense

Collaborator

Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, LLC

Collaborator